Loading…

Magnetic Resonance Perfusion Tracks 133 Xe Cerebral Blood Flow Changes After Carotid Stenting

Background and Purpose— To compare magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion to gold-standard cerebral blood flow (CBF) determined by intra-arterial 133 Xe washout method. Methods— Eight patients with high-grade carotid stenoses underwent bolus-tracking MR perfusion and intra-arterial 133 Xe washout before...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke (1970) 2005-03, Vol.36 (3), p.676-678
Main Authors: Ko, Nerissa U., Achrol, Achal S., Martin, Alastair J., Chopra, Manju, Saloner, David A., Higashida, Randall T., Young, William L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background and Purpose— To compare magnetic resonance (MR) perfusion to gold-standard cerebral blood flow (CBF) determined by intra-arterial 133 Xe washout method. Methods— Eight patients with high-grade carotid stenoses underwent bolus-tracking MR perfusion and intra-arterial 133 Xe washout before and after carotid stenting. MR perfusion was compared with 133 Xe-CBF values using Pearson linear correlation analysis. Results— We observed a mean 37±38% increase in 133 Xe-CBF and a mean 19±27% increase in relative CBF (rCBF) by MR perfusion immediately after stent placement. Relative (percent) changes in MR-rCBF showed a close and linear correlation to those seen in 133 Xe-CBF ( r =0.91; R 2 =0.84; P =0.002). There was a trend for MR perfusion to underestimate change in CBF at higher relative changes in flow. Conclusion— Bolus-tracking MR perfusion correlates with 133 Xe-CBF in estimating postprocedural increases in blood flow but may underestimate the magnitude of the change with higher relative changes.
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/01.STR.0000155743.60019.e5