Loading…

Abstract P028: Higher Waist Circumference Identifies Insulin Resistance in Middle-age African-American Women Compared to Standard Metabolic Waist Thresholds for Europeans

Abstract only Introduction Waist circumference thresholds that predict insulin resistance (IR) or metabolic syndrome may differ by race and ethnicity. Notably, a recent analysis of data from young African American (AA) adults (age 35±8) indicated that for AA women, the waist circumference (WC) predi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2012-03, Vol.125 (suppl_10)
Main Authors: Harman, Jane L, Buxbaum, Sarah G, Hairston, Kristen G, Sumner, Anne E
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract only Introduction Waist circumference thresholds that predict insulin resistance (IR) or metabolic syndrome may differ by race and ethnicity. Notably, a recent analysis of data from young African American (AA) adults (age 35±8) indicated that for AA women, the waist circumference (WC) predicting the top tertile of IR (mean HOMA-IR=3.0) was higher (≥98cm) than the IDF and NCEP-ATPIII threshold (≥88cm) for central obesity of metabolic syndrome. Hypothesis This analysis tested the hypothesis that in middle-aged AA adults, the WC predicting IR would be similar to that found in young AA adults: in AA women, a higher WC would predict IR than the standard WC threshold for metabolic syndrome. Methods Participants were AA adults attending the first examination of the Jackson Heart Study (2000-2004). After restricting analysis to non-related persons, non-diabetic, ages 35-80, BMI 18.5-55, with non-missing HOMA-IR, the analytical data set comprised 2269 persons (1374 women); age 55±11 (mean±SD); HOMA-IR 3.6±2.2; BMI 31±6.4 kg/m 2 ; WC: women: 98.3±15.6cm, men: 100.2 ±13.7cm. By ROC analysis, WC was a significantly better predictor of HOMA-IR than BMI for women but not men, although the predictive Area Under the Curve (AUC) was greater for men than women for both variables: AUC for WC vs.BMI: 0.78 vs 0.77 for men (p=.13); 0.75 vs 0.72 for women (p
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.125.suppl_10.AP028