Loading…

Abstract 13306: Impella Combined With Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Synergistically Unloads the Left Ventricle and Reduces Infarct Size in a Model of Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock

IntroductionExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) supports hemodynamics in cardiogenic shock (CS) at the expense of left ventricular (LV) overload. LV assist device (LVAD) also supports hemodynamics, whereas LVAD unloads LV. Therefore, the combination of ECMO and LVAD would augment hemodynamic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2020-11, Vol.142 (Suppl_3 Suppl 3), p.A13306-A13306
Main Authors: Sunagawa, Genya, Saku, Keita, Nishikawa, Takuya, Suematsu, Nobuhiro, Kubota, Toru, Sunagawa, Kenji, Tsutsui, Hiroyuki
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:IntroductionExtracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) supports hemodynamics in cardiogenic shock (CS) at the expense of left ventricular (LV) overload. LV assist device (LVAD) also supports hemodynamics, whereas LVAD unloads LV. Therefore, the combination of ECMO and LVAD would augment hemodynamic support and unload LV. We hypothesized that the combination therapy in acute myocardial infarct (AMI) in CS could synergistically improve hemodynamics and unload LV, which, in turn, reduces infarct size. MethodsIn protocol 1, we ligated coronary arteries and created AMI with CS in 5 mongrel dogs (15.1±0.3 kg). We transvascularly introduced Impella CP into LV. We kept the ECMO flow constant at 1.8L/min. We compared hemodynamics and the LV pressure-volume area (PVA, an index of LV oxygen consumption) under 3 conditions; Control, ECMO, and ECMO+Impella (ECPELLA) in each dog. In protocol 2 (n=15), we ligated coronary arteries for 180 min and then reperfused. We activated Impella CP and/or ECMO from 60 min after the coronary ligation to the end of the experiment. We allocated dogs into 3 groups, no support (Control), ECMO, and ECPELLA and compared infarct size at 180 min after reperfusion among 3 groups. ResultsIn protocol 1, both ECMO and ECPELLA increased arterial pressure compared to Control (Control63±9, ECMO88±10 and ECPELLA97±18 mmHg, p < 0.05), and resolved the CS status. ECPELLA strikingly reduced PVA by 83% relative to Control (1500±326, 2038±357 and 258±182 mmHg*ml, p
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.142.suppl_3.13306