Abstract 13402: Outcomes of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Ischemic versus Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Clinical Trials

• Published in: Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-11, Vol.148 (Suppl_1)
• Main Authors: Sudesh, Saurabh, Abraham, William T, Cleland, John G, Curtis, Anne B, Friedman, Daniel, Gold, Michael R, Kutyifa, Valentina, Linde, Cecilia M, TANG, Anthony L, Olivas-Martinez, Antonio, Inoue, Lurdes, Schmidler, Gillian, Al-Khatib, Sana M
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0009-7322; 1524-4539
• DOI: 10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.13402

Abstract only Background: Data on whether CRT results in better clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in patients with NICM versus patients with ICM are conflicting. Objective: To determine if there are differences in clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of CRT in patients with ICM versus NICM. Methods: We analyzed patient-level data from 7 CRT trials (MIRACLE, MIRACLE-ICD, MIRACLE-ICD II, COMPANION, RAFT, MADIT-CRT, REVERSE) using Bayesian Hierarchical Weibull survival regression modeling, adjusted for baseline characteristics and presence of an ICD, to determine the effect of etiology of cardiac dysfunction on time to all-cause mortality alone and in combination with heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves were developed with unadjusted frequentist analyses. Linear regression was used to assess the effect of etiology of cardiomyopathy on echocardiographic measurements. Results: Of the 6252 patients included, 1535 (25%) were women, the median age was 66 (IQR 58-73), 3704 (59%) had ICM, and 3778 (60%) received CRT. Of those who received CRT, 2207 (58%) patients had ICM. Overall, CRT increased the time to HFH or death (hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% credible interval (CrI) 0.56-0.82, p