Abstract 15540: Comparative Outcomes of Femoropopliteal Intravascular Ultrasound Interventions: A Report From the XLPAD Registry

Abstract only Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during peripheral artery intervention is being increasingly used, however there is limited real-world procedural and outcomes data. Methods: We examined 4847 patients from the XLPAD Registry (NCT01904851) from 2006-2021 that underwent femorop...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Circulation (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2023-11, Vol.148 (Suppl_1)
Main Authors: Fernandez Vazquez, David, Weideman, Sarah, Bruneman, Blake, NANJUNDAPPA, Aravinda, Metzger, Christopher, sayfo, sameh, Rosol, Zachary, Tsai, Shirling, Shishehbor, Mehdi H, Banerjee, Subhash
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract only Background: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) during peripheral artery intervention is being increasingly used, however there is limited real-world procedural and outcomes data. Methods: We examined 4847 patients from the XLPAD Registry (NCT01904851) from 2006-2021 that underwent femoropopliteal (FP) endovascular intervention. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse limb events (MALE), which includes death, clinically driven revascularization, amputation, myocardial infarction (MI), and stroke. Comparative analyses were done between patients with IVUS and no IVUS interventions. Results: 322 (6.6%) patients underwent an IVUS guided FP intervention and 4525 without. Mean age 67, predominantly men (83% IVUS-group vs. 71% non-IVUS, p
ISSN:0009-7322
1524-4539
DOI:10.1161/circ.148.suppl_1.15540