Loading…
Abstract 13: Improved Ischemic Stroke Outcome Prediction Using Model Estimation Of Outcome Probability: The THRIVE-c Calculator
Abstract only Introduction: The THRIVE score is a validated ischemic stroke outcome prediction tool. While simplified systems like the THRIVE score facilitate ease-of-use, when computers or devices are available at the point of care, a more accurate estimation of outcome probability is possible by c...
Saved in:
Published in: | Stroke (1970) 2015-02, Vol.46 (suppl_1) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Abstract only
Introduction:
The THRIVE score is a validated ischemic stroke outcome prediction tool. While simplified systems like the THRIVE score facilitate ease-of-use, when computers or devices are available at the point of care, a more accurate estimation of outcome probability is possible by computing the logistic equation with patient-specific continuous variables.
Methods:
We used data from 12,207 subjects from the Virtual International Stroke Trials Archive (VISTA) and the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke - Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) study to develop and validate the performance of a model-derived estimation of outcome probability, the THRIVE-c calculation. Models were built with logistic regression using the underlying predictors from the THRIVE score: age, NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, and the Chronic Disease Scale (presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, or atrial fibrillation). Receiver-Operator Characteristics (ROC) analysis was used to assess model performance and compare the THRIVE-c model to the traditional THRIVE score.
Results:
The THRIVE-c model performed similarly in the randomly chosen development cohort (n=6194, AUC = 0.786, 95% CI 0.774-0.798) and validation cohort (n=6013, AUC = 0.784, 95% CI 0.772-0.796) (P=0.79). The THRIVE-c model (AUC = 0.785, 95% CI 0.777-0.793) had superior performance when compared to the traditional THRIVE score (AUC = 0.746, 95% CI 0.737-0.755), (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0039-2499 1524-4628 |
DOI: | 10.1161/str.46.suppl_1.13 |