Loading…

Abstract WMP118: In Safe Hands: Implementation on the Stroke Unit. Does it Improve Patient Care and Ward Efficiency?

Abstract only The ‘In Safe Hands” (ISH) is a structured interdisciplinary bedside round developed to increase patients participation in their care in acute hospital wards. This has shown to improve quality of care by reducing communication errors and complications, enhancing a culture of safety in a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke (1970) 2017-02, Vol.48 (suppl_1)
Main Authors: Jala, Sheila M, Giaccari, Sarah, Passer, Melissa, Bertmar, Carin, Day, Susan, Krause, Martin
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract only The ‘In Safe Hands” (ISH) is a structured interdisciplinary bedside round developed to increase patients participation in their care in acute hospital wards. This has shown to improve quality of care by reducing communication errors and complications, enhancing a culture of safety in an acute hospital. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of ISH on length of stay (LOS), in-hospital complications and assess whether the ISH enhances patient and staff satisfaction in a stroke unit of a tertiary hospital in Sydney, Australia. This was a longitudinal study pre and post implementation. A total of 200 patients participated in the study. Data on the length of stay, incidence rate relating to patient safety and patient and staff satisfaction surveys using Patient Experience Tracker (PET) devices were collected pre and post implementation. ISH increased the number of patients with at least 72hours in stroke unit care by 80 percent (P < 0.001). Fever and hyperglycaemia were treated in all patients following ISH implementation vs only 50% and 64% respectively of patients pre ISH implementation. Swallow screen was completed in all patients prior oral intake compared to 92% of patients of the pre ISH group (P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in the LOS and complications. All stroke patients received stroke education and there were no readmissions post implementation. There was no significant difference in the patient and staff satisfaction. In conclusion, although ISH did not improve the primary endpoints of LOS, complications and satisfaction it did improve protocol adherence.
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wmp118