Loading…

Abstract WP41: A Multi-Parametric Perfusion Model Improves Assessment of Penumbral Flow in Stroke Imaging

Abstract only Introduction: Perfusion imaging by DSC-MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI) is the clinical method of choice for identification of penumbral flow (PF) in acute stroke. To date, the tissue at risk is estimated by a single predefined perfusion map. However, integration of various pe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Stroke (1970) 2017-02, Vol.48 (suppl_1)
Main Authors: Livne, Michelle, Kossen, Tabea, Madai, Vince, Zaro-Weber, Olivier, Moeller-Hartman, Walter, Heiss, Wolf-Dieter, Sobesky, Jan
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract only Introduction: Perfusion imaging by DSC-MRI (dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI) is the clinical method of choice for identification of penumbral flow (PF) in acute stroke. To date, the tissue at risk is estimated by a single predefined perfusion map. However, integration of various perfusion parameters may amplify the pathophysiological information and yield better estimation of PF. We therefore combined the common perfusion maps in a generalized linear model (GLM) to predict PF as defined by positron emission tomography (PET). Methods: In 18 patients with (sub)acute stroke, consecutive DSC-MRI and O15-water PET was performed (median age/NIHSS: 58 y , 12). PF was defined as cerebral-blood-flow (CBF) < 20 mL/100g/min on PET. MRI perfusion maps included: CBF, CBV, MTT, Tmax, TTP (cerebral-blood-volume, mean-transit-time, time-to-maximum and time-to-peak respectively). Probability maps for PF prediction were generated by a) single maps and b) multi-parametric maps (GLM) and underwent cross validation. ROC analysis assessed performance for PF prediction as area-under the curve (AUC). Results: Single maps showed AUC values between 0.57 and 0.72 (Tmax and CFB showing best performance). The GLM approach yielded an AUC of 0.75. Comparison by the Wilcoxon signed rank test showed that while the absolute difference was moderate, it was significant (p
ISSN:0039-2499
1524-4628
DOI:10.1161/str.48.suppl_1.wp41