Contempt for Court in Russia: The Impact of Litigation Experience

This article explores how Russians think about their courts and whether court veterans are distinguishable from those who have never used the courts. The analysis is based on data generated by a nationally representative survey fielded in 2010. The analysis clearly shows that users and nonusers thin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of Central and East European law 2017-01, Vol.42 (2-3), p.134-168
Main Author: Hendley, Kathryn
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b285t-3de41dae0e641f8548c64d23a8f66a7b1625273bb9d154069436378cfd52e9423
cites
container_end_page 168
container_issue 2-3
container_start_page 134
container_title Review of Central and East European law
container_volume 42
creator Hendley, Kathryn
description This article explores how Russians think about their courts and whether court veterans are distinguishable from those who have never used the courts. The analysis is based on data generated by a nationally representative survey fielded in 2010. The analysis clearly shows that users and nonusers think differently about courts and law. Users are both more positive and more negative about the courts, depending on the context. Although they praise the work of judges and other courthouse personnel in their own cases, they seem to emerge with lingering negative views of the courts that come into focus when asked more general questions. Nonusers tend to be more optimistic about the potential of courts to achieve justice.
doi_str_mv 10.1163/15730352-04202002
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>brill_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_15730352_04202002</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1163_15730352_04202002</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b285t-3de41dae0e641f8548c64d23a8f66a7b1625273bb9d154069436378cfd52e9423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoWEcfwF1eoM7Nb1N3QxmdgYIg47qkbaIZ-keSAX17W8bZujpw4Lvc8yH0SOCJEMnWRGQMmKApcAoUgF6hZOnSpbxGCeRUpLlScIvuQjgCEABBE7QpxiGaforYjh4X48lH7Ab8fgrB6Wd8-DJ430-6iXi0uHTRferoxgFvvyfjnRkac49urO6CefjLFfp42R6KXVq-ve6LTZnWVImYstZw0moDRnJileCqkbylTCsrpc5qIqmgGavrvCWCg8w5kyxTjW0FNTmnbIXI-W7jxxC8sdXkXa_9T0WgWhxUFwfVxcHMrM9M7V3XVcd53jD_-A_xCzwYWq4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Contempt for Court in Russia: The Impact of Litigation Experience</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><creator>Hendley, Kathryn</creator><creatorcontrib>Hendley, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><description>This article explores how Russians think about their courts and whether court veterans are distinguishable from those who have never used the courts. The analysis is based on data generated by a nationally representative survey fielded in 2010. The analysis clearly shows that users and nonusers think differently about courts and law. Users are both more positive and more negative about the courts, depending on the context. Although they praise the work of judges and other courthouse personnel in their own cases, they seem to emerge with lingering negative views of the courts that come into focus when asked more general questions. Nonusers tend to be more optimistic about the potential of courts to achieve justice.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0925-9880</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0925-9880</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1163/15730352-04202002</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Leiden: Brill</publisher><ispartof>Review of Central and East European law, 2017-01, Vol.42 (2-3), p.134-168</ispartof><rights>2017 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b285t-3de41dae0e641f8548c64d23a8f66a7b1625273bb9d154069436378cfd52e9423</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hendley, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><title>Contempt for Court in Russia: The Impact of Litigation Experience</title><title>Review of Central and East European law</title><description>This article explores how Russians think about their courts and whether court veterans are distinguishable from those who have never used the courts. The analysis is based on data generated by a nationally representative survey fielded in 2010. The analysis clearly shows that users and nonusers think differently about courts and law. Users are both more positive and more negative about the courts, depending on the context. Although they praise the work of judges and other courthouse personnel in their own cases, they seem to emerge with lingering negative views of the courts that come into focus when asked more general questions. Nonusers tend to be more optimistic about the potential of courts to achieve justice.</description><issn>0925-9880</issn><issn>1573-0352</issn><issn>0925-9880</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1KxDAUhYMoWEcfwF1eoM7Nb1N3QxmdgYIg47qkbaIZ-keSAX17W8bZujpw4Lvc8yH0SOCJEMnWRGQMmKApcAoUgF6hZOnSpbxGCeRUpLlScIvuQjgCEABBE7QpxiGaforYjh4X48lH7Ab8fgrB6Wd8-DJ430-6iXi0uHTRferoxgFvvyfjnRkac49urO6CefjLFfp42R6KXVq-ve6LTZnWVImYstZw0moDRnJileCqkbylTCsrpc5qIqmgGavrvCWCg8w5kyxTjW0FNTmnbIXI-W7jxxC8sdXkXa_9T0WgWhxUFwfVxcHMrM9M7V3XVcd53jD_-A_xCzwYWq4</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Hendley, Kathryn</creator><general>Brill</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Contempt for Court in Russia: The Impact of Litigation Experience</title><author>Hendley, Kathryn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b285t-3de41dae0e641f8548c64d23a8f66a7b1625273bb9d154069436378cfd52e9423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hendley, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Review of Central and East European law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hendley, Kathryn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Contempt for Court in Russia: The Impact of Litigation Experience</atitle><jtitle>Review of Central and East European law</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2-3</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>168</epage><pages>134-168</pages><issn>0925-9880</issn><eissn>1573-0352</eissn><eissn>0925-9880</eissn><abstract>This article explores how Russians think about their courts and whether court veterans are distinguishable from those who have never used the courts. The analysis is based on data generated by a nationally representative survey fielded in 2010. The analysis clearly shows that users and nonusers think differently about courts and law. Users are both more positive and more negative about the courts, depending on the context. Although they praise the work of judges and other courthouse personnel in their own cases, they seem to emerge with lingering negative views of the courts that come into focus when asked more general questions. Nonusers tend to be more optimistic about the potential of courts to achieve justice.</abstract><cop>Leiden</cop><pub>Brill</pub><doi>10.1163/15730352-04202002</doi><tpages>35</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0925-9880
ispartof Review of Central and East European law, 2017-01, Vol.42 (2-3), p.134-168
issn 0925-9880
1573-0352
0925-9880
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1163_15730352_04202002
source Business Source Ultimate
title Contempt for Court in Russia: The Impact of Litigation Experience
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A17%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-brill_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Contempt%20for%20Court%20in%20Russia:%20The%20Impact%20of%20Litigation%20Experience&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20Central%20and%20East%20European%20law&rft.au=Hendley,%20Kathryn&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2-3&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=168&rft.pages=134-168&rft.issn=0925-9880&rft.eissn=1573-0352&rft_id=info:doi/10.1163/15730352-04202002&rft_dat=%3Cbrill_cross%3E10_1163_15730352_04202002%3C/brill_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b285t-3de41dae0e641f8548c64d23a8f66a7b1625273bb9d154069436378cfd52e9423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true