The Appellate Body's Power to Interpret the WTO Agreements and WTO Members' Power to Disagree with the Appellate Body

Abstract The United States criticizes the Appellate Body for 'making law' by interpreting and applying the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements in disregard of the intention of WTO members. The criticism of the United States is not without legitimate basis in that Members have few too...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of world investment & trade 2019-12, Vol.20 (6), p.792-819
Main Author: Fukunaga, Yuka
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract The United States criticizes the Appellate Body for 'making law' by interpreting and applying the World Trade Organization (WTO) agreements in disregard of the intention of WTO members. The criticism of the United States is not without legitimate basis in that Members have few tools with which they may weigh in on the interpretation of the WTO agreements, even if the Appellate Body makes an erroneous interpretation. As much as the Appellate Body's contribution to the security and predictability of the multilateral trading system warrants praise, the dysfunction of legislative and political mechanisms to counterbalance the growing de facto 'authority' of the Appellate Body should be a cause for concern. Against this background, this article proposes a new mechanism that would allow Members to disagree with interpretations by the Appellate Body and pronounce their own interpretations of the WTO agreements. The mechanism would be built upon 'interpretative declarations.'
ISSN:1660-7112
2211-9000
DOI:10.1163/22119000-12340158