Loading…

Comparative study of metamodeling and sampling design for expensive and semi-expensive simulation models under uncertainty

In spite of the wide improvements in computer simulation packages, many complex simulation models, particularly under uncertainty, may be inefficient to run in terms of time, computation, and resources. To address such a challenge, integrating metamodels and robust design optimization has been appli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Simulation (San Diego, Calif.) Calif.), 2020-01, Vol.96 (1), p.89-110
Main Authors: Parnianifard, Amir, Azfanizam, AS, Ariffin, MKA, Ismail, MIS
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-198cb01044e3ca4b44bcbd2fd8c3817892863cc8f4a534bafb57253eba4986b63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-198cb01044e3ca4b44bcbd2fd8c3817892863cc8f4a534bafb57253eba4986b63
container_end_page 110
container_issue 1
container_start_page 89
container_title Simulation (San Diego, Calif.)
container_volume 96
creator Parnianifard, Amir
Azfanizam, AS
Ariffin, MKA
Ismail, MIS
description In spite of the wide improvements in computer simulation packages, many complex simulation models, particularly under uncertainty, may be inefficient to run in terms of time, computation, and resources. To address such a challenge, integrating metamodels and robust design optimization has been applied. In the current paper, a systematic comparative study is implemented to evaluate the performance of three common metamodels, namely polynomial regression, kriging, and radial basis function. The required experiments are designed by different space-filling methods including the orthogonal array design and three forms of Latin hypercube sampling such as randomized, maximin, and correlation approaches. Although, the impact of sample size on the performance of metamodels in robust optimization results are investigated. All methods are analyzed using five two-dimensional test problems and one engineering problem while all of them are considered in two forms that are expensive (with a small sample size) and semi-expensive (with a large sample size). Uncertainty is assumed in all problems as a source of variability, so all test problems are conducted in the format of robust optimization in the class of dual response surface in order to estimate robust Pareto frontier. The performances of methods are studied in two terms of accuracy and robustness. Finally, the results of comparison, an applicable guideline is provided to aid the practitioners in selecting the appropriate combination of metamodels and sampling design methods for investigating set of robust optimal points (estimated Pareto frontier) in simulation–optimization problems under uncertainty.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0037549719846988
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0037549719846988</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0037549719846988</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0037549719846988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-198cb01044e3ca4b44bcbd2fd8c3817892863cc8f4a534bafb57253eba4986b63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3mD8QTTZpkx5l8QWCFz2XPKZLlk1SklZcf73triAIXmaY-R7MfAhdM3rDmJS3lHJZiUayRom6UeoELZgUjHDG-SlazDCZ8XN0UcqWUlYxWS_Q1zqFXmc9-A_AZRjdHqcOBxh0SA52Pm6wjg4XHfrD4KD4TcRdyhg-e4hl1h0YEDz5XRUfxt3kmiI-GBU8Rgd5qhbyoH0c9pforNO7Alc_fYneH-7f1k_k5fXxeX33QixXbCDTQ9ZQRoUAbrUwQhhr3Kpzasalalaq5taqTuiKC6M7U8lVxcFo0aja1HyJ6NHX5lRKhq7tsw8671tG2zm79m92k4QcJUVvoN2mMcfpwv_53wuyckQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study of metamodeling and sampling design for expensive and semi-expensive simulation models under uncertainty</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Parnianifard, Amir ; Azfanizam, AS ; Ariffin, MKA ; Ismail, MIS</creator><creatorcontrib>Parnianifard, Amir ; Azfanizam, AS ; Ariffin, MKA ; Ismail, MIS</creatorcontrib><description>In spite of the wide improvements in computer simulation packages, many complex simulation models, particularly under uncertainty, may be inefficient to run in terms of time, computation, and resources. To address such a challenge, integrating metamodels and robust design optimization has been applied. In the current paper, a systematic comparative study is implemented to evaluate the performance of three common metamodels, namely polynomial regression, kriging, and radial basis function. The required experiments are designed by different space-filling methods including the orthogonal array design and three forms of Latin hypercube sampling such as randomized, maximin, and correlation approaches. Although, the impact of sample size on the performance of metamodels in robust optimization results are investigated. All methods are analyzed using five two-dimensional test problems and one engineering problem while all of them are considered in two forms that are expensive (with a small sample size) and semi-expensive (with a large sample size). Uncertainty is assumed in all problems as a source of variability, so all test problems are conducted in the format of robust optimization in the class of dual response surface in order to estimate robust Pareto frontier. The performances of methods are studied in two terms of accuracy and robustness. Finally, the results of comparison, an applicable guideline is provided to aid the practitioners in selecting the appropriate combination of metamodels and sampling design methods for investigating set of robust optimal points (estimated Pareto frontier) in simulation–optimization problems under uncertainty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0037-5497</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-3133</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0037549719846988</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Simulation (San Diego, Calif.), 2020-01, Vol.96 (1), p.89-110</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-198cb01044e3ca4b44bcbd2fd8c3817892863cc8f4a534bafb57253eba4986b63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-198cb01044e3ca4b44bcbd2fd8c3817892863cc8f4a534bafb57253eba4986b63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0760-2149</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,79110</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parnianifard, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azfanizam, AS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariffin, MKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, MIS</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study of metamodeling and sampling design for expensive and semi-expensive simulation models under uncertainty</title><title>Simulation (San Diego, Calif.)</title><description>In spite of the wide improvements in computer simulation packages, many complex simulation models, particularly under uncertainty, may be inefficient to run in terms of time, computation, and resources. To address such a challenge, integrating metamodels and robust design optimization has been applied. In the current paper, a systematic comparative study is implemented to evaluate the performance of three common metamodels, namely polynomial regression, kriging, and radial basis function. The required experiments are designed by different space-filling methods including the orthogonal array design and three forms of Latin hypercube sampling such as randomized, maximin, and correlation approaches. Although, the impact of sample size on the performance of metamodels in robust optimization results are investigated. All methods are analyzed using five two-dimensional test problems and one engineering problem while all of them are considered in two forms that are expensive (with a small sample size) and semi-expensive (with a large sample size). Uncertainty is assumed in all problems as a source of variability, so all test problems are conducted in the format of robust optimization in the class of dual response surface in order to estimate robust Pareto frontier. The performances of methods are studied in two terms of accuracy and robustness. Finally, the results of comparison, an applicable guideline is provided to aid the practitioners in selecting the appropriate combination of metamodels and sampling design methods for investigating set of robust optimal points (estimated Pareto frontier) in simulation–optimization problems under uncertainty.</description><issn>0037-5497</issn><issn>1741-3133</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UEtLxDAQDqLgunr3mD8QTTZpkx5l8QWCFz2XPKZLlk1SklZcf73triAIXmaY-R7MfAhdM3rDmJS3lHJZiUayRom6UeoELZgUjHDG-SlazDCZ8XN0UcqWUlYxWS_Q1zqFXmc9-A_AZRjdHqcOBxh0SA52Pm6wjg4XHfrD4KD4TcRdyhg-e4hl1h0YEDz5XRUfxt3kmiI-GBU8Rgd5qhbyoH0c9pforNO7Alc_fYneH-7f1k_k5fXxeX33QixXbCDTQ9ZQRoUAbrUwQhhr3Kpzasalalaq5taqTuiKC6M7U8lVxcFo0aja1HyJ6NHX5lRKhq7tsw8671tG2zm79m92k4QcJUVvoN2mMcfpwv_53wuyckQ</recordid><startdate>202001</startdate><enddate>202001</enddate><creator>Parnianifard, Amir</creator><creator>Azfanizam, AS</creator><creator>Ariffin, MKA</creator><creator>Ismail, MIS</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-2149</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202001</creationdate><title>Comparative study of metamodeling and sampling design for expensive and semi-expensive simulation models under uncertainty</title><author>Parnianifard, Amir ; Azfanizam, AS ; Ariffin, MKA ; Ismail, MIS</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-198cb01044e3ca4b44bcbd2fd8c3817892863cc8f4a534bafb57253eba4986b63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parnianifard, Amir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azfanizam, AS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ariffin, MKA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ismail, MIS</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Simulation (San Diego, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parnianifard, Amir</au><au>Azfanizam, AS</au><au>Ariffin, MKA</au><au>Ismail, MIS</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study of metamodeling and sampling design for expensive and semi-expensive simulation models under uncertainty</atitle><jtitle>Simulation (San Diego, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2020-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>89-110</pages><issn>0037-5497</issn><eissn>1741-3133</eissn><abstract>In spite of the wide improvements in computer simulation packages, many complex simulation models, particularly under uncertainty, may be inefficient to run in terms of time, computation, and resources. To address such a challenge, integrating metamodels and robust design optimization has been applied. In the current paper, a systematic comparative study is implemented to evaluate the performance of three common metamodels, namely polynomial regression, kriging, and radial basis function. The required experiments are designed by different space-filling methods including the orthogonal array design and three forms of Latin hypercube sampling such as randomized, maximin, and correlation approaches. Although, the impact of sample size on the performance of metamodels in robust optimization results are investigated. All methods are analyzed using five two-dimensional test problems and one engineering problem while all of them are considered in two forms that are expensive (with a small sample size) and semi-expensive (with a large sample size). Uncertainty is assumed in all problems as a source of variability, so all test problems are conducted in the format of robust optimization in the class of dual response surface in order to estimate robust Pareto frontier. The performances of methods are studied in two terms of accuracy and robustness. Finally, the results of comparison, an applicable guideline is provided to aid the practitioners in selecting the appropriate combination of metamodels and sampling design methods for investigating set of robust optimal points (estimated Pareto frontier) in simulation–optimization problems under uncertainty.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0037549719846988</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0760-2149</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0037-5497
ispartof Simulation (San Diego, Calif.), 2020-01, Vol.96 (1), p.89-110
issn 0037-5497
1741-3133
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0037549719846988
source SAGE
title Comparative study of metamodeling and sampling design for expensive and semi-expensive simulation models under uncertainty
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A46%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20of%20metamodeling%20and%20sampling%20design%20for%20expensive%20and%20semi-expensive%20simulation%20models%20under%20uncertainty&rft.jtitle=Simulation%20(San%20Diego,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Parnianifard,%20Amir&rft.date=2020-01&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=89-110&rft.issn=0037-5497&rft.eissn=1741-3133&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0037549719846988&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0037549719846988%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c381t-198cb01044e3ca4b44bcbd2fd8c3817892863cc8f4a534bafb57253eba4986b63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0037549719846988&rfr_iscdi=true