Loading…

A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence

Background Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is sti...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Phlebology 2019-12, Vol.34 (10), p.669-674
Main Authors: Krasznai, Attila G, Sigterman, Tim A, Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P, Eussen, Ed, Snoeijs, Maarten, Sikkink, Kees Jan JM, de Boer, Edith M, Wittens, Cees HA, Bouwman, Lee H
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3bbbbbe465cf0081616f20c98a057b0022b0b05a9571c2e1e65927cad45517213
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3bbbbbe465cf0081616f20c98a057b0022b0b05a9571c2e1e65927cad45517213
container_end_page 674
container_issue 10
container_start_page 669
container_title Phlebology
container_volume 34
creator Krasznai, Attila G
Sigterman, Tim A
Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P
Eussen, Ed
Snoeijs, Maarten
Sikkink, Kees Jan JM
de Boer, Edith M
Wittens, Cees HA
Bouwman, Lee H
description Background Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping. Method Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery. Results A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) (p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ. Conclusion Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0268355519833255
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0268355519833255</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0268355519833255</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0268355519833255</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3bbbbbe465cf0081616f20c98a057b0022b0b05a9571c2e1e65927cad45517213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMKdo38g4EcdJ8eq4lGpEhc4R467aV2ldrR2kfL3OLQnJPayo92Z0e4Q8sjZE-daPzNRVlIpxetKSqHUFZlxraqCc6GuyWxaF9P-ltzFeGCMCa31jIxLisZvw9FF2FIbfMLQ9xkmdKbPg-Ng0PndL0KI0QVP0x7QDCM1XQKkMVOHYeJ0AemA7mhwpDsEk2g0wx58OEX6Dc5T5ycbSOAt3JObzvQRHi59Tr5eXz5X78Xm4229Wm4KK6VOhWyngkWpbMdYxUtedoLZujJM6Ta_IVrWMmVqpbkVwKFUtdDWbBc5Cy24nBN29rUYYkTomsuJDWfNFF3zN7osKc6SaHbQHMIJfb7wf_4PTLVxAw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Krasznai, Attila G ; Sigterman, Tim A ; Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P ; Eussen, Ed ; Snoeijs, Maarten ; Sikkink, Kees Jan JM ; de Boer, Edith M ; Wittens, Cees HA ; Bouwman, Lee H</creator><creatorcontrib>Krasznai, Attila G ; Sigterman, Tim A ; Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P ; Eussen, Ed ; Snoeijs, Maarten ; Sikkink, Kees Jan JM ; de Boer, Edith M ; Wittens, Cees HA ; Bouwman, Lee H</creatorcontrib><description>Background Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping. Method Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery. Results A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) (p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ. Conclusion Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3555</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-1125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0268355519833255</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Phlebology, 2019-12, Vol.34 (10), p.669-674</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3bbbbbe465cf0081616f20c98a057b0022b0b05a9571c2e1e65927cad45517213</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3bbbbbe465cf0081616f20c98a057b0022b0b05a9571c2e1e65927cad45517213</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1519-5934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Krasznai, Attila G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigterman, Tim A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eussen, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snoeijs, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikkink, Kees Jan JM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Boer, Edith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittens, Cees HA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwman, Lee H</creatorcontrib><title>A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence</title><title>Phlebology</title><description>Background Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping. Method Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery. Results A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) (p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ. Conclusion Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.</description><issn>0268-3555</issn><issn>1758-1125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtOwzAQtBBIlMKdo38g4EcdJ8eq4lGpEhc4R467aV2ldrR2kfL3OLQnJPayo92Z0e4Q8sjZE-daPzNRVlIpxetKSqHUFZlxraqCc6GuyWxaF9P-ltzFeGCMCa31jIxLisZvw9FF2FIbfMLQ9xkmdKbPg-Ng0PndL0KI0QVP0x7QDCM1XQKkMVOHYeJ0AemA7mhwpDsEk2g0wx58OEX6Dc5T5ycbSOAt3JObzvQRHi59Tr5eXz5X78Xm4229Wm4KK6VOhWyngkWpbMdYxUtedoLZujJM6Ta_IVrWMmVqpbkVwKFUtdDWbBc5Cy24nBN29rUYYkTomsuJDWfNFF3zN7osKc6SaHbQHMIJfb7wf_4PTLVxAw</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Krasznai, Attila G</creator><creator>Sigterman, Tim A</creator><creator>Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P</creator><creator>Eussen, Ed</creator><creator>Snoeijs, Maarten</creator><creator>Sikkink, Kees Jan JM</creator><creator>de Boer, Edith M</creator><creator>Wittens, Cees HA</creator><creator>Bouwman, Lee H</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-5934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence</title><author>Krasznai, Attila G ; Sigterman, Tim A ; Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P ; Eussen, Ed ; Snoeijs, Maarten ; Sikkink, Kees Jan JM ; de Boer, Edith M ; Wittens, Cees HA ; Bouwman, Lee H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3bbbbbe465cf0081616f20c98a057b0022b0b05a9571c2e1e65927cad45517213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Krasznai, Attila G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sigterman, Tim A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eussen, Ed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Snoeijs, Maarten</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sikkink, Kees Jan JM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Boer, Edith M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittens, Cees HA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bouwman, Lee H</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Phlebology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Krasznai, Attila G</au><au>Sigterman, Tim A</au><au>Houtermans-Auckel, Janine P</au><au>Eussen, Ed</au><au>Snoeijs, Maarten</au><au>Sikkink, Kees Jan JM</au><au>de Boer, Edith M</au><au>Wittens, Cees HA</au><au>Bouwman, Lee H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence</atitle><jtitle>Phlebology</jtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>669</spage><epage>674</epage><pages>669-674</pages><issn>0268-3555</issn><eissn>1758-1125</eissn><abstract>Background Venous insufficiency of the lower extremity affects up to 40–60% of general adult population in the Western population, of which around 25% has varicose veins mostly treated by ablation of the incompetent great saphenous vein. Although endovenous options are available, the majority is still treated with stripping of the great saphenous vein for which there is no consensus regarding postoperative compressive therapy. The objective of this prospective randomised controlled trial was to evaluate 4 h compared to 72 h of leg compression after great saphenous vein stripping. Method Patients in the Zuyderland Medical Centre with an indication for stripping of the great saphenous vein were eligible for inclusion in this study. Patients were randomised to 4 or 72 h of leg compression (standard elastic bandaging) after stripping of the great saphenous vein. Primary outcome was change in leg volume after 14 days. Secondary outcomes were post-operative pain scores, complications and time to full recovery. Results A total of 78 patients were randomised, 36 patients enrolled the intervention (4 h) group and 42 patients the control group (72 h). The intervention group (4 h) showed a 57 mL reduction in leg volume after 14 days, compared to 6 mL of the control group (72 h) (p = 0.11). Post-operative pain, complications and time to full recovery did not statistically differ. Conclusion Wearing leg compression four hours after stripping is non-inferior in preventing leg oedema compared with 72 h compression therapy. No statistically significant difference in pain and time to full recovery was shown.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0268355519833255</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1519-5934</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0268-3555
ispartof Phlebology, 2019-12, Vol.34 (10), p.669-674
issn 0268-3555
1758-1125
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0268355519833255
source Sage Journals Online
title A randomised controlled trial comparing compression therapy after stripping for primary great saphenous vein incompetence
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A21%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomised%20controlled%20trial%20comparing%20compression%20therapy%20after%20stripping%20for%20primary%20great%20saphenous%20vein%20incompetence&rft.jtitle=Phlebology&rft.au=Krasznai,%20Attila%20G&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=669&rft.epage=674&rft.pages=669-674&rft.issn=0268-3555&rft.eissn=1758-1125&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0268355519833255&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0268355519833255%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-3bbbbbe465cf0081616f20c98a057b0022b0b05a9571c2e1e65927cad45517213%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0268355519833255&rfr_iscdi=true