Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the Modified Barthel Index and the 'adapted' Functional Independence Measure

The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) have been used to provide objective measures of functional status and change of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. To compare rating scores on the MBI and FIM, the functional abilities of 41 SCI patients were rated by on...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical rehabilitation 1990-11, Vol.4 (4), p.277-285
Main Authors: Roth, Elliot, Davidoff, Gary, Haughton, John, Ardner, Mary
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2465-384d313b965aa4f0d31f37aaa3a1c633581efbc5b705458f080d930a5194128a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2465-384d313b965aa4f0d31f37aaa3a1c633581efbc5b705458f080d930a5194128a3
container_end_page 285
container_issue 4
container_start_page 277
container_title Clinical rehabilitation
container_volume 4
creator Roth, Elliot
Davidoff, Gary
Haughton, John
Ardner, Mary
description The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) have been used to provide objective measures of functional status and change of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. To compare rating scores on the MBI and FIM, the functional abilities of 41 SCI patients were rated by one trained nurse-clinician using both scales at admission to initial rehabilitation (ADM), discharge from rehabilitation (DC) and at follow-up (FU) 12 months after rehabilitation. An 'adapted' FIM score was used, and total MBI and FIM scores were divided into self-care and mobility subscores. Comparisons were made between each MBI score and each FIM score at each point in time (ADM, DC, FU) using simple linear regression, which was also used to compare changes in the MBI and FIM scores from ADM to DC and from DC to FU. Excellent correlations ( p
doi_str_mv 10.1177/026921559000400405
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_026921559000400405</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_026921559000400405</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_026921559000400405</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2465-384d313b965aa4f0d31f37aaa3a1c633581efbc5b705458f080d930a5194128a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BT7n1tJpskk3WmxarhYoXPS_TfGhKm12SXbA_wX9t1noQBGGY4c2894YZhC4puaJUymtSVnVJhagJIXwMcYQmlEtZECXZMZqMhGJknKKzlDaZpkpOJ-hzMQTd-zbAFkNKNqWdDT32AafOj03dRpPhZoj7GwwZ7jqIPrUBtw737xY_tcY7bw2-g5jxFi-DsR8Ygvkez8BA11szw782jZTO5hR0NrCQhmjP0YmDbbIXP3WKXhf3L_PHYvX8sJzfrgpd8koUTHHDKFvXlQDgjmTgmAQABlRXjAlFrVtrsZZEcKEcUcTUjICgNaelAjZF5cFXxzalaF3TRb-DuG8oacZnNn-fmUXXB1GCN9ts2iHmM9J_ii-dOnVV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the Modified Barthel Index and the 'adapted' Functional Independence Measure</title><source>SAGE Deep Backfile 2012</source><creator>Roth, Elliot ; Davidoff, Gary ; Haughton, John ; Ardner, Mary</creator><creatorcontrib>Roth, Elliot ; Davidoff, Gary ; Haughton, John ; Ardner, Mary</creatorcontrib><description>The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) have been used to provide objective measures of functional status and change of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. To compare rating scores on the MBI and FIM, the functional abilities of 41 SCI patients were rated by one trained nurse-clinician using both scales at admission to initial rehabilitation (ADM), discharge from rehabilitation (DC) and at follow-up (FU) 12 months after rehabilitation. An 'adapted' FIM score was used, and total MBI and FIM scores were divided into self-care and mobility subscores. Comparisons were made between each MBI score and each FIM score at each point in time (ADM, DC, FU) using simple linear regression, which was also used to compare changes in the MBI and FIM scores from ADM to DC and from DC to FU. Excellent correlations ( p&lt;0.0005) were found between MBI and FIM scores at all points in time and between changes in MBI scores and changes in FIM scores over each time interval.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-2155</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0873</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/026921559000400405</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><ispartof>Clinical rehabilitation, 1990-11, Vol.4 (4), p.277-285</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2465-384d313b965aa4f0d31f37aaa3a1c633581efbc5b705458f080d930a5194128a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2465-384d313b965aa4f0d31f37aaa3a1c633581efbc5b705458f080d930a5194128a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/026921559000400405$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/026921559000400405$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21827,27906,27907,45064,45452</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roth, Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haughton, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardner, Mary</creatorcontrib><title>Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the Modified Barthel Index and the 'adapted' Functional Independence Measure</title><title>Clinical rehabilitation</title><description>The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) have been used to provide objective measures of functional status and change of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. To compare rating scores on the MBI and FIM, the functional abilities of 41 SCI patients were rated by one trained nurse-clinician using both scales at admission to initial rehabilitation (ADM), discharge from rehabilitation (DC) and at follow-up (FU) 12 months after rehabilitation. An 'adapted' FIM score was used, and total MBI and FIM scores were divided into self-care and mobility subscores. Comparisons were made between each MBI score and each FIM score at each point in time (ADM, DC, FU) using simple linear regression, which was also used to compare changes in the MBI and FIM scores from ADM to DC and from DC to FU. Excellent correlations ( p&lt;0.0005) were found between MBI and FIM scores at all points in time and between changes in MBI scores and changes in FIM scores over each time interval.</description><issn>0269-2155</issn><issn>1477-0873</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BT7n1tJpskk3WmxarhYoXPS_TfGhKm12SXbA_wX9t1noQBGGY4c2894YZhC4puaJUymtSVnVJhagJIXwMcYQmlEtZECXZMZqMhGJknKKzlDaZpkpOJ-hzMQTd-zbAFkNKNqWdDT32AafOj03dRpPhZoj7GwwZ7jqIPrUBtw737xY_tcY7bw2-g5jxFi-DsR8Ygvkez8BA11szw782jZTO5hR0NrCQhmjP0YmDbbIXP3WKXhf3L_PHYvX8sJzfrgpd8koUTHHDKFvXlQDgjmTgmAQABlRXjAlFrVtrsZZEcKEcUcTUjICgNaelAjZF5cFXxzalaF3TRb-DuG8oacZnNn-fmUXXB1GCN9ts2iHmM9J_ii-dOnVV</recordid><startdate>199011</startdate><enddate>199011</enddate><creator>Roth, Elliot</creator><creator>Davidoff, Gary</creator><creator>Haughton, John</creator><creator>Ardner, Mary</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199011</creationdate><title>Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the Modified Barthel Index and the 'adapted' Functional Independence Measure</title><author>Roth, Elliot ; Davidoff, Gary ; Haughton, John ; Ardner, Mary</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2465-384d313b965aa4f0d31f37aaa3a1c633581efbc5b705458f080d930a5194128a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roth, Elliot</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davidoff, Gary</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haughton, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ardner, Mary</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roth, Elliot</au><au>Davidoff, Gary</au><au>Haughton, John</au><au>Ardner, Mary</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the Modified Barthel Index and the 'adapted' Functional Independence Measure</atitle><jtitle>Clinical rehabilitation</jtitle><date>1990-11</date><risdate>1990</risdate><volume>4</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>277</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>277-285</pages><issn>0269-2155</issn><eissn>1477-0873</eissn><abstract>The Modified Barthel Index (MBI) and the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) have been used to provide objective measures of functional status and change of spinal cord injured (SCI) patients. To compare rating scores on the MBI and FIM, the functional abilities of 41 SCI patients were rated by one trained nurse-clinician using both scales at admission to initial rehabilitation (ADM), discharge from rehabilitation (DC) and at follow-up (FU) 12 months after rehabilitation. An 'adapted' FIM score was used, and total MBI and FIM scores were divided into self-care and mobility subscores. Comparisons were made between each MBI score and each FIM score at each point in time (ADM, DC, FU) using simple linear regression, which was also used to compare changes in the MBI and FIM scores from ADM to DC and from DC to FU. Excellent correlations ( p&lt;0.0005) were found between MBI and FIM scores at all points in time and between changes in MBI scores and changes in FIM scores over each time interval.</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/026921559000400405</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-2155
ispartof Clinical rehabilitation, 1990-11, Vol.4 (4), p.277-285
issn 0269-2155
1477-0873
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_026921559000400405
source SAGE Deep Backfile 2012
title Functional assessment in spinal cord injury: a comparison of the Modified Barthel Index and the 'adapted' Functional Independence Measure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T07%3A52%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Functional%20assessment%20in%20spinal%20cord%20injury:%20a%20comparison%20of%20the%20Modified%20Barthel%20Index%20and%20the%20'adapted'%20Functional%20Independence%20Measure&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Roth,%20Elliot&rft.date=1990-11&rft.volume=4&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=277&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=277-285&rft.issn=0269-2155&rft.eissn=1477-0873&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/026921559000400405&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_026921559000400405%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2465-384d313b965aa4f0d31f37aaa3a1c633581efbc5b705458f080d930a5194128a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_026921559000400405&rfr_iscdi=true