Loading…

Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments

Backgrounds In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments. Methods After the translation procedures, the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tumori 2012-07, Vol.98 (4), p.491-500
Main Authors: Ripamonti, Carla Ida, Buonaccorso, Loredana, Maruelli, Alice, Bandieri, Elena, Pessi, M Adelaide, Boldini, Stefania, Primi, Caterina, Miccinesi, Guido
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13
container_end_page 500
container_issue 4
container_start_page 491
container_title Tumori
container_volume 98
creator Ripamonti, Carla Ida
Buonaccorso, Loredana
Maruelli, Alice
Bandieri, Elena
Pessi, M Adelaide
Boldini, Stefania
Primi, Caterina
Miccinesi, Guido
description Backgrounds In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments. Methods After the translation procedures, the PDI was administered to 266 patients along with other questionnaires to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of PDI. Factor structure was tested by both explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was tested through convergent and divergent validity with validated questionnaires inquiring about physical and psychological symptoms, and religiosity. The test/retest reliability was assessed through the concordance coefficient of Linn (two-week interval, 80 patients). Results The explorative analysis suggested one factor only loading highly on all the 25 items (>.45) and explaining the 48% variance; confirmative analysis and Cronbach alpha (0.96) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor model. In the 2-week test-retest study, a concordance coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83) was found. High correlations of problems with dignity were found with both physical and psychological symptoms (0.52 and 0.64 rho coefficient, respectively), and a moderate inverse correlation with spiritual well being (-.40). The dignity construct, as measured by PDI, proved to be orthogonal to that of religiosity (-.02). Conclusions The Italian version of PDI is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the dignity related-distress in out-patients with solid and hematological cancers, on active oncological treatments, in non advanced stages of the disease.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/030089161209800415
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_030089161209800415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_030089161209800415</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_030089161209800415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotl5ewIWcpS5Gk0xmpuNO6q0gqFjdDmeSTBtpM5KklT6M72qG1m4EFyHk5Ps_OD8hJ4xeMFYUlzSldFCynHFaDigVLNshfU7TQcIzXu6SfgckHdEjB95_RITyPN8nPZ7SjLO86JPvZwxG2wA3ZmJNWMHILuOzdSs4e74ZncPLQvtgWmvROH0F46mGd5wZhd0QXsNCrcBYGIU4RAsbnYcvE6bw2kYS0Cp40HMM7aydGIkzGKKV2nmIhmsZzFLDk5Xb37HTGOad5YjsNTjz-nhzH5K3u9vx8CF5fLofDa8fE5kyGpKsYBqplnmdDepclTWmSqhclIJLwURRqyIe3eSCFrVuMsEVrRslleSiQGTpIeFrr3St90431aczc3SritGq67r623UMna5Dn4t6rtU28ltuBC7XgMeJrj7ahbNxif-UP7nAihc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Ripamonti, Carla Ida ; Buonaccorso, Loredana ; Maruelli, Alice ; Bandieri, Elena ; Pessi, M Adelaide ; Boldini, Stefania ; Primi, Caterina ; Miccinesi, Guido</creator><creatorcontrib>Ripamonti, Carla Ida ; Buonaccorso, Loredana ; Maruelli, Alice ; Bandieri, Elena ; Pessi, M Adelaide ; Boldini, Stefania ; Primi, Caterina ; Miccinesi, Guido</creatorcontrib><description>Backgrounds In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments. Methods After the translation procedures, the PDI was administered to 266 patients along with other questionnaires to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of PDI. Factor structure was tested by both explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was tested through convergent and divergent validity with validated questionnaires inquiring about physical and psychological symptoms, and religiosity. The test/retest reliability was assessed through the concordance coefficient of Linn (two-week interval, 80 patients). Results The explorative analysis suggested one factor only loading highly on all the 25 items (&gt;.45) and explaining the 48% variance; confirmative analysis and Cronbach alpha (0.96) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor model. In the 2-week test-retest study, a concordance coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83) was found. High correlations of problems with dignity were found with both physical and psychological symptoms (0.52 and 0.64 rho coefficient, respectively), and a moderate inverse correlation with spiritual well being (-.40). The dignity construct, as measured by PDI, proved to be orthogonal to that of religiosity (-.02). Conclusions The Italian version of PDI is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the dignity related-distress in out-patients with solid and hematological cancers, on active oncological treatments, in non advanced stages of the disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-8916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-2529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/030089161209800415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23052167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Hematologic Neoplasms - psychology ; Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy ; Humans ; Italy ; Language ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Personal Autonomy ; Personhood ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Religion ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report ; Stress, Psychological - etiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translations</subject><ispartof>Tumori, 2012-07, Vol.98 (4), p.491-500</ispartof><rights>2012 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23052167$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ripamonti, Carla Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buonaccorso, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruelli, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandieri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessi, M Adelaide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldini, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primi, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miccinesi, Guido</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments</title><title>Tumori</title><addtitle>Tumori</addtitle><description>Backgrounds In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments. Methods After the translation procedures, the PDI was administered to 266 patients along with other questionnaires to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of PDI. Factor structure was tested by both explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was tested through convergent and divergent validity with validated questionnaires inquiring about physical and psychological symptoms, and religiosity. The test/retest reliability was assessed through the concordance coefficient of Linn (two-week interval, 80 patients). Results The explorative analysis suggested one factor only loading highly on all the 25 items (&gt;.45) and explaining the 48% variance; confirmative analysis and Cronbach alpha (0.96) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor model. In the 2-week test-retest study, a concordance coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83) was found. High correlations of problems with dignity were found with both physical and psychological symptoms (0.52 and 0.64 rho coefficient, respectively), and a moderate inverse correlation with spiritual well being (-.40). The dignity construct, as measured by PDI, proved to be orthogonal to that of religiosity (-.02). Conclusions The Italian version of PDI is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the dignity related-distress in out-patients with solid and hematological cancers, on active oncological treatments, in non advanced stages of the disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematologic Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Personhood</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - etiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translations</subject><issn>0300-8916</issn><issn>2038-2529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotl5ewIWcpS5Gk0xmpuNO6q0gqFjdDmeSTBtpM5KklT6M72qG1m4EFyHk5Ps_OD8hJ4xeMFYUlzSldFCynHFaDigVLNshfU7TQcIzXu6SfgckHdEjB95_RITyPN8nPZ7SjLO86JPvZwxG2wA3ZmJNWMHILuOzdSs4e74ZncPLQvtgWmvROH0F46mGd5wZhd0QXsNCrcBYGIU4RAsbnYcvE6bw2kYS0Cp40HMM7aydGIkzGKKV2nmIhmsZzFLDk5Xb37HTGOad5YjsNTjz-nhzH5K3u9vx8CF5fLofDa8fE5kyGpKsYBqplnmdDepclTWmSqhclIJLwURRqyIe3eSCFrVuMsEVrRslleSiQGTpIeFrr3St90431aczc3SritGq67r623UMna5Dn4t6rtU28ltuBC7XgMeJrj7ahbNxif-UP7nAihc</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Ripamonti, Carla Ida</creator><creator>Buonaccorso, Loredana</creator><creator>Maruelli, Alice</creator><creator>Bandieri, Elena</creator><creator>Pessi, M Adelaide</creator><creator>Boldini, Stefania</creator><creator>Primi, Caterina</creator><creator>Miccinesi, Guido</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments</title><author>Ripamonti, Carla Ida ; Buonaccorso, Loredana ; Maruelli, Alice ; Bandieri, Elena ; Pessi, M Adelaide ; Boldini, Stefania ; Primi, Caterina ; Miccinesi, Guido</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematologic Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Personhood</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - etiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ripamonti, Carla Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buonaccorso, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruelli, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandieri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessi, M Adelaide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldini, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primi, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miccinesi, Guido</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Tumori</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ripamonti, Carla Ida</au><au>Buonaccorso, Loredana</au><au>Maruelli, Alice</au><au>Bandieri, Elena</au><au>Pessi, M Adelaide</au><au>Boldini, Stefania</au><au>Primi, Caterina</au><au>Miccinesi, Guido</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments</atitle><jtitle>Tumori</jtitle><addtitle>Tumori</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>491-500</pages><issn>0300-8916</issn><eissn>2038-2529</eissn><abstract>Backgrounds In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments. Methods After the translation procedures, the PDI was administered to 266 patients along with other questionnaires to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of PDI. Factor structure was tested by both explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was tested through convergent and divergent validity with validated questionnaires inquiring about physical and psychological symptoms, and religiosity. The test/retest reliability was assessed through the concordance coefficient of Linn (two-week interval, 80 patients). Results The explorative analysis suggested one factor only loading highly on all the 25 items (&gt;.45) and explaining the 48% variance; confirmative analysis and Cronbach alpha (0.96) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor model. In the 2-week test-retest study, a concordance coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83) was found. High correlations of problems with dignity were found with both physical and psychological symptoms (0.52 and 0.64 rho coefficient, respectively), and a moderate inverse correlation with spiritual well being (-.40). The dignity construct, as measured by PDI, proved to be orthogonal to that of religiosity (-.02). Conclusions The Italian version of PDI is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the dignity related-distress in out-patients with solid and hematological cancers, on active oncological treatments, in non advanced stages of the disease.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23052167</pmid><doi>10.1177/030089161209800415</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-8916
ispartof Tumori, 2012-07, Vol.98 (4), p.491-500
issn 0300-8916
2038-2529
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_030089161209800415
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Adult
Aged
Factor Analysis, Statistical
Female
Hematologic Neoplasms - psychology
Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy
Humans
Italy
Language
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasms - pathology
Neoplasms - psychology
Neoplasms - therapy
Personal Autonomy
Personhood
Psychometrics
Quality of Life
Religion
Reproducibility of Results
Self Report
Stress, Psychological - etiology
Surveys and Questionnaires
Translations
title Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Dignity%20Inventory%20(PDI)%20Questionnaire:%20The%20Validation%20Study%20in%20Italian%20Patients%20with%20Solid%20and%20Hematological%20Cancers%20on%20Active%20Oncological%20Treatments&rft.jtitle=Tumori&rft.au=Ripamonti,%20Carla%20Ida&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=491-500&rft.issn=0300-8916&rft.eissn=2038-2529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/030089161209800415&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_030089161209800415%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23052167&rft_sage_id=10.1177_030089161209800415&rfr_iscdi=true