Loading…
Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments
Backgrounds In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments. Methods After the translation procedures, the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tumori 2012-07, Vol.98 (4), p.491-500 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13 |
container_end_page | 500 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 491 |
container_title | Tumori |
container_volume | 98 |
creator | Ripamonti, Carla Ida Buonaccorso, Loredana Maruelli, Alice Bandieri, Elena Pessi, M Adelaide Boldini, Stefania Primi, Caterina Miccinesi, Guido |
description | Backgrounds
In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments.
Methods
After the translation procedures, the PDI was administered to 266 patients along with other questionnaires to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of PDI. Factor structure was tested by both explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was tested through convergent and divergent validity with validated questionnaires inquiring about physical and psychological symptoms, and religiosity. The test/retest reliability was assessed through the concordance coefficient of Linn (two-week interval, 80 patients).
Results
The explorative analysis suggested one factor only loading highly on all the 25 items (>.45) and explaining the 48% variance; confirmative analysis and Cronbach alpha (0.96) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor model. In the 2-week test-retest study, a concordance coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83) was found. High correlations of problems with dignity were found with both physical and psychological symptoms (0.52 and 0.64 rho coefficient, respectively), and a moderate inverse correlation with spiritual well being (-.40). The dignity construct, as measured by PDI, proved to be orthogonal to that of religiosity (-.02).
Conclusions
The Italian version of PDI is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the dignity related-distress in out-patients with solid and hematological cancers, on active oncological treatments, in non advanced stages of the disease. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/030089161209800415 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_030089161209800415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_030089161209800415</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_030089161209800415</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotl5ewIWcpS5Gk0xmpuNO6q0gqFjdDmeSTBtpM5KklT6M72qG1m4EFyHk5Ps_OD8hJ4xeMFYUlzSldFCynHFaDigVLNshfU7TQcIzXu6SfgckHdEjB95_RITyPN8nPZ7SjLO86JPvZwxG2wA3ZmJNWMHILuOzdSs4e74ZncPLQvtgWmvROH0F46mGd5wZhd0QXsNCrcBYGIU4RAsbnYcvE6bw2kYS0Cp40HMM7aydGIkzGKKV2nmIhmsZzFLDk5Xb37HTGOad5YjsNTjz-nhzH5K3u9vx8CF5fLofDa8fE5kyGpKsYBqplnmdDepclTWmSqhclIJLwURRqyIe3eSCFrVuMsEVrRslleSiQGTpIeFrr3St90431aczc3SritGq67r623UMna5Dn4t6rtU28ltuBC7XgMeJrj7ahbNxif-UP7nAihc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Ripamonti, Carla Ida ; Buonaccorso, Loredana ; Maruelli, Alice ; Bandieri, Elena ; Pessi, M Adelaide ; Boldini, Stefania ; Primi, Caterina ; Miccinesi, Guido</creator><creatorcontrib>Ripamonti, Carla Ida ; Buonaccorso, Loredana ; Maruelli, Alice ; Bandieri, Elena ; Pessi, M Adelaide ; Boldini, Stefania ; Primi, Caterina ; Miccinesi, Guido</creatorcontrib><description>Backgrounds
In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments.
Methods
After the translation procedures, the PDI was administered to 266 patients along with other questionnaires to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of PDI. Factor structure was tested by both explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was tested through convergent and divergent validity with validated questionnaires inquiring about physical and psychological symptoms, and religiosity. The test/retest reliability was assessed through the concordance coefficient of Linn (two-week interval, 80 patients).
Results
The explorative analysis suggested one factor only loading highly on all the 25 items (>.45) and explaining the 48% variance; confirmative analysis and Cronbach alpha (0.96) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor model. In the 2-week test-retest study, a concordance coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83) was found. High correlations of problems with dignity were found with both physical and psychological symptoms (0.52 and 0.64 rho coefficient, respectively), and a moderate inverse correlation with spiritual well being (-.40). The dignity construct, as measured by PDI, proved to be orthogonal to that of religiosity (-.02).
Conclusions
The Italian version of PDI is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the dignity related-distress in out-patients with solid and hematological cancers, on active oncological treatments, in non advanced stages of the disease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-8916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2038-2529</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/030089161209800415</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23052167</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Factor Analysis, Statistical ; Female ; Hematologic Neoplasms - psychology ; Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy ; Humans ; Italy ; Language ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Neoplasms - therapy ; Personal Autonomy ; Personhood ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Religion ; Reproducibility of Results ; Self Report ; Stress, Psychological - etiology ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Translations</subject><ispartof>Tumori, 2012-07, Vol.98 (4), p.491-500</ispartof><rights>2012 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23052167$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ripamonti, Carla Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buonaccorso, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruelli, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandieri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessi, M Adelaide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldini, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primi, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miccinesi, Guido</creatorcontrib><title>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments</title><title>Tumori</title><addtitle>Tumori</addtitle><description>Backgrounds
In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments.
Methods
After the translation procedures, the PDI was administered to 266 patients along with other questionnaires to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of PDI. Factor structure was tested by both explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was tested through convergent and divergent validity with validated questionnaires inquiring about physical and psychological symptoms, and religiosity. The test/retest reliability was assessed through the concordance coefficient of Linn (two-week interval, 80 patients).
Results
The explorative analysis suggested one factor only loading highly on all the 25 items (>.45) and explaining the 48% variance; confirmative analysis and Cronbach alpha (0.96) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor model. In the 2-week test-retest study, a concordance coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83) was found. High correlations of problems with dignity were found with both physical and psychological symptoms (0.52 and 0.64 rho coefficient, respectively), and a moderate inverse correlation with spiritual well being (-.40). The dignity construct, as measured by PDI, proved to be orthogonal to that of religiosity (-.02).
Conclusions
The Italian version of PDI is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the dignity related-distress in out-patients with solid and hematological cancers, on active oncological treatments, in non advanced stages of the disease.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Factor Analysis, Statistical</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hematologic Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Italy</subject><subject>Language</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Neoplasms - therapy</subject><subject>Personal Autonomy</subject><subject>Personhood</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Religion</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Self Report</subject><subject>Stress, Psychological - etiology</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Translations</subject><issn>0300-8916</issn><issn>2038-2529</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhoMotl5ewIWcpS5Gk0xmpuNO6q0gqFjdDmeSTBtpM5KklT6M72qG1m4EFyHk5Ps_OD8hJ4xeMFYUlzSldFCynHFaDigVLNshfU7TQcIzXu6SfgckHdEjB95_RITyPN8nPZ7SjLO86JPvZwxG2wA3ZmJNWMHILuOzdSs4e74ZncPLQvtgWmvROH0F46mGd5wZhd0QXsNCrcBYGIU4RAsbnYcvE6bw2kYS0Cp40HMM7aydGIkzGKKV2nmIhmsZzFLDk5Xb37HTGOad5YjsNTjz-nhzH5K3u9vx8CF5fLofDa8fE5kyGpKsYBqplnmdDepclTWmSqhclIJLwURRqyIe3eSCFrVuMsEVrRslleSiQGTpIeFrr3St90431aczc3SritGq67r623UMna5Dn4t6rtU28ltuBC7XgMeJrj7ahbNxif-UP7nAihc</recordid><startdate>20120701</startdate><enddate>20120701</enddate><creator>Ripamonti, Carla Ida</creator><creator>Buonaccorso, Loredana</creator><creator>Maruelli, Alice</creator><creator>Bandieri, Elena</creator><creator>Pessi, M Adelaide</creator><creator>Boldini, Stefania</creator><creator>Primi, Caterina</creator><creator>Miccinesi, Guido</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120701</creationdate><title>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments</title><author>Ripamonti, Carla Ida ; Buonaccorso, Loredana ; Maruelli, Alice ; Bandieri, Elena ; Pessi, M Adelaide ; Boldini, Stefania ; Primi, Caterina ; Miccinesi, Guido</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Factor Analysis, Statistical</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hematologic Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Italy</topic><topic>Language</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Neoplasms - therapy</topic><topic>Personal Autonomy</topic><topic>Personhood</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Religion</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Self Report</topic><topic>Stress, Psychological - etiology</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Translations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ripamonti, Carla Ida</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buonaccorso, Loredana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maruelli, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bandieri, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pessi, M Adelaide</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boldini, Stefania</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Primi, Caterina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miccinesi, Guido</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Tumori</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ripamonti, Carla Ida</au><au>Buonaccorso, Loredana</au><au>Maruelli, Alice</au><au>Bandieri, Elena</au><au>Pessi, M Adelaide</au><au>Boldini, Stefania</au><au>Primi, Caterina</au><au>Miccinesi, Guido</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments</atitle><jtitle>Tumori</jtitle><addtitle>Tumori</addtitle><date>2012-07-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>98</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>500</epage><pages>491-500</pages><issn>0300-8916</issn><eissn>2038-2529</eissn><abstract>Backgrounds
In Oncology, little is known about dignity-related distress and the issues that influence the sense of dignity for patients. We validated the Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) questionnaire in Italian patients on oncological active treatments.
Methods
After the translation procedures, the PDI was administered to 266 patients along with other questionnaires to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of PDI. Factor structure was tested by both explorative and confirmatory factor analyses. Concurrent validity was tested through convergent and divergent validity with validated questionnaires inquiring about physical and psychological symptoms, and religiosity. The test/retest reliability was assessed through the concordance coefficient of Linn (two-week interval, 80 patients).
Results
The explorative analysis suggested one factor only loading highly on all the 25 items (>.45) and explaining the 48% variance; confirmative analysis and Cronbach alpha (0.96) confirmed the adequacy of the one-factor model. In the 2-week test-retest study, a concordance coefficient of 0.73 (95% CI, 0.64–0.83) was found. High correlations of problems with dignity were found with both physical and psychological symptoms (0.52 and 0.64 rho coefficient, respectively), and a moderate inverse correlation with spiritual well being (-.40). The dignity construct, as measured by PDI, proved to be orthogonal to that of religiosity (-.02).
Conclusions
The Italian version of PDI is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate the dignity related-distress in out-patients with solid and hematological cancers, on active oncological treatments, in non advanced stages of the disease.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23052167</pmid><doi>10.1177/030089161209800415</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-8916 |
ispartof | Tumori, 2012-07, Vol.98 (4), p.491-500 |
issn | 0300-8916 2038-2529 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_030089161209800415 |
source | Sage Journals Online |
subjects | Adult Aged Factor Analysis, Statistical Female Hematologic Neoplasms - psychology Hematologic Neoplasms - therapy Humans Italy Language Male Middle Aged Neoplasms - pathology Neoplasms - psychology Neoplasms - therapy Personal Autonomy Personhood Psychometrics Quality of Life Religion Reproducibility of Results Self Report Stress, Psychological - etiology Surveys and Questionnaires Translations |
title | Patient Dignity Inventory (PDI) Questionnaire: The Validation Study in Italian Patients with Solid and Hematological Cancers on Active Oncological Treatments |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T05%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Patient%20Dignity%20Inventory%20(PDI)%20Questionnaire:%20The%20Validation%20Study%20in%20Italian%20Patients%20with%20Solid%20and%20Hematological%20Cancers%20on%20Active%20Oncological%20Treatments&rft.jtitle=Tumori&rft.au=Ripamonti,%20Carla%20Ida&rft.date=2012-07-01&rft.volume=98&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=500&rft.pages=491-500&rft.issn=0300-8916&rft.eissn=2038-2529&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/030089161209800415&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_030089161209800415%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c310t-571ea0ec6b58b6d9ba3d4d64942c4147bd77bdef6407bef542d0bfdcdc247aa13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/23052167&rft_sage_id=10.1177_030089161209800415&rfr_iscdi=true |