Loading…

Analyzing the Effect of Autonomous Ridehailing on Transit Ridership: Competitor or Desirable First-/Last-Mile Connection?

Ridehailing services (e.g., Uber or Lyft) may serve as a substitute or a complement—or some combination thereof—to transit. Automation as an emerging technology is expected to further complicate the current complex relationship between transit and ridehailing. This paper aims to explore how US commu...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transportation research record 2021-11, Vol.2675 (11), p.1154-1167
Main Authors: Khaloei, Moein, Ranjbari, Andisheh, Laberteaux, Ken, MacKenzie, Don
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4ba8557c609b19c22e7148c48416df31cb38c5f54bed075386eeafa7e43be3fc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4ba8557c609b19c22e7148c48416df31cb38c5f54bed075386eeafa7e43be3fc3
container_end_page 1167
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1154
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2675
creator Khaloei, Moein
Ranjbari, Andisheh
Laberteaux, Ken
MacKenzie, Don
description Ridehailing services (e.g., Uber or Lyft) may serve as a substitute or a complement—or some combination thereof—to transit. Automation as an emerging technology is expected to further complicate the current complex relationship between transit and ridehailing. This paper aims to explore how US commuters’ stated willingness to ride transit is influenced by the price of ridehailing services and whether the service is provided by an autonomous vehicle. To that end, a stated preference survey was launched around the US to ask 1,500 commuters how they would choose their commute mode from among choices including their current mode and other conventional modes as well as asking them to choose between their current mode and an autonomous mode. Using a joint stated and revealed preference dataset, a mixed logit model was developed and analyzed. The results show that ridehailing per se might not be a significant competitor to transit, especially if it is integrated with transit as a first-/last-mile service. The total share of transit (transit-only riders plus those who use transit in connection with first-/last-mile ridehailing) remains substantially flat as set against conventional ridehailing services, even if ridehailing fares decrease. On the other hand, when the ridehailing price is significantly reduced by automation, our analysis suggests a decline in total transit ridership and an increase in ridehailing, especially for solo ridehailing. Also, it was found that autonomous pooled ridehailing might not be as appealing to commuters as autonomous solo ridehailing.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/03611981211025278
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_03611981211025278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03611981211025278</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_03611981211025278</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4ba8557c609b19c22e7148c48416df31cb38c5f54bed075386eeafa7e43be3fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kN1KAzEQhYMoWKsP4F1eYNv8brLeSFlbFSqC1OslmyZtyjYpSXpRn95d650gDDNw5nwzcAC4x2iCsRBTREuMK4kJxohwIuQFGBFcVgVDnFyC0bAvBsM1uElphxClTNAROM286k5fzm9g3ho4t9boDIOFs2MOPuzDMcEPtzZb5brBFDxcReWTyz9yTFt3eIB12B9MdjlE2NeTSS6qtjNw4WLKxXSp-v7meqEO3vcPXPCPt-DKqi6Zu985Bp-L-ap-KZbvz6_1bFloIlkuWKsk50KXqGpxpQkxAjOpmWS4XFuKdUul5paz1qyR4FSWxiirhGG0NdRqOgb4fFfHkFI0tjlEt1fx1GDUDNk1f7LrmcmZSWpjml04xj6l9A_wDYk3cEo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analyzing the Effect of Autonomous Ridehailing on Transit Ridership: Competitor or Desirable First-/Last-Mile Connection?</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Khaloei, Moein ; Ranjbari, Andisheh ; Laberteaux, Ken ; MacKenzie, Don</creator><creatorcontrib>Khaloei, Moein ; Ranjbari, Andisheh ; Laberteaux, Ken ; MacKenzie, Don</creatorcontrib><description>Ridehailing services (e.g., Uber or Lyft) may serve as a substitute or a complement—or some combination thereof—to transit. Automation as an emerging technology is expected to further complicate the current complex relationship between transit and ridehailing. This paper aims to explore how US commuters’ stated willingness to ride transit is influenced by the price of ridehailing services and whether the service is provided by an autonomous vehicle. To that end, a stated preference survey was launched around the US to ask 1,500 commuters how they would choose their commute mode from among choices including their current mode and other conventional modes as well as asking them to choose between their current mode and an autonomous mode. Using a joint stated and revealed preference dataset, a mixed logit model was developed and analyzed. The results show that ridehailing per se might not be a significant competitor to transit, especially if it is integrated with transit as a first-/last-mile service. The total share of transit (transit-only riders plus those who use transit in connection with first-/last-mile ridehailing) remains substantially flat as set against conventional ridehailing services, even if ridehailing fares decrease. On the other hand, when the ridehailing price is significantly reduced by automation, our analysis suggests a decline in total transit ridership and an increase in ridehailing, especially for solo ridehailing. Also, it was found that autonomous pooled ridehailing might not be as appealing to commuters as autonomous solo ridehailing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03611981211025278</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2021-11, Vol.2675 (11), p.1154-1167</ispartof><rights>National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4ba8557c609b19c22e7148c48416df31cb38c5f54bed075386eeafa7e43be3fc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4ba8557c609b19c22e7148c48416df31cb38c5f54bed075386eeafa7e43be3fc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2108-7953 ; 0000-0001-8061-2100 ; 0000-0002-0344-2344</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khaloei, Moein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranjbari, Andisheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laberteaux, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, Don</creatorcontrib><title>Analyzing the Effect of Autonomous Ridehailing on Transit Ridership: Competitor or Desirable First-/Last-Mile Connection?</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Ridehailing services (e.g., Uber or Lyft) may serve as a substitute or a complement—or some combination thereof—to transit. Automation as an emerging technology is expected to further complicate the current complex relationship between transit and ridehailing. This paper aims to explore how US commuters’ stated willingness to ride transit is influenced by the price of ridehailing services and whether the service is provided by an autonomous vehicle. To that end, a stated preference survey was launched around the US to ask 1,500 commuters how they would choose their commute mode from among choices including their current mode and other conventional modes as well as asking them to choose between their current mode and an autonomous mode. Using a joint stated and revealed preference dataset, a mixed logit model was developed and analyzed. The results show that ridehailing per se might not be a significant competitor to transit, especially if it is integrated with transit as a first-/last-mile service. The total share of transit (transit-only riders plus those who use transit in connection with first-/last-mile ridehailing) remains substantially flat as set against conventional ridehailing services, even if ridehailing fares decrease. On the other hand, when the ridehailing price is significantly reduced by automation, our analysis suggests a decline in total transit ridership and an increase in ridehailing, especially for solo ridehailing. Also, it was found that autonomous pooled ridehailing might not be as appealing to commuters as autonomous solo ridehailing.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kN1KAzEQhYMoWKsP4F1eYNv8brLeSFlbFSqC1OslmyZtyjYpSXpRn95d650gDDNw5nwzcAC4x2iCsRBTREuMK4kJxohwIuQFGBFcVgVDnFyC0bAvBsM1uElphxClTNAROM286k5fzm9g3ho4t9boDIOFs2MOPuzDMcEPtzZb5brBFDxcReWTyz9yTFt3eIB12B9MdjlE2NeTSS6qtjNw4WLKxXSp-v7meqEO3vcPXPCPt-DKqi6Zu985Bp-L-ap-KZbvz6_1bFloIlkuWKsk50KXqGpxpQkxAjOpmWS4XFuKdUul5paz1qyR4FSWxiirhGG0NdRqOgb4fFfHkFI0tjlEt1fx1GDUDNk1f7LrmcmZSWpjml04xj6l9A_wDYk3cEo</recordid><startdate>20211101</startdate><enddate>20211101</enddate><creator>Khaloei, Moein</creator><creator>Ranjbari, Andisheh</creator><creator>Laberteaux, Ken</creator><creator>MacKenzie, Don</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2108-7953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-2100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0344-2344</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211101</creationdate><title>Analyzing the Effect of Autonomous Ridehailing on Transit Ridership: Competitor or Desirable First-/Last-Mile Connection?</title><author>Khaloei, Moein ; Ranjbari, Andisheh ; Laberteaux, Ken ; MacKenzie, Don</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4ba8557c609b19c22e7148c48416df31cb38c5f54bed075386eeafa7e43be3fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khaloei, Moein</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ranjbari, Andisheh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laberteaux, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacKenzie, Don</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khaloei, Moein</au><au>Ranjbari, Andisheh</au><au>Laberteaux, Ken</au><au>MacKenzie, Don</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analyzing the Effect of Autonomous Ridehailing on Transit Ridership: Competitor or Desirable First-/Last-Mile Connection?</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2021-11-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2675</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1154</spage><epage>1167</epage><pages>1154-1167</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><abstract>Ridehailing services (e.g., Uber or Lyft) may serve as a substitute or a complement—or some combination thereof—to transit. Automation as an emerging technology is expected to further complicate the current complex relationship between transit and ridehailing. This paper aims to explore how US commuters’ stated willingness to ride transit is influenced by the price of ridehailing services and whether the service is provided by an autonomous vehicle. To that end, a stated preference survey was launched around the US to ask 1,500 commuters how they would choose their commute mode from among choices including their current mode and other conventional modes as well as asking them to choose between their current mode and an autonomous mode. Using a joint stated and revealed preference dataset, a mixed logit model was developed and analyzed. The results show that ridehailing per se might not be a significant competitor to transit, especially if it is integrated with transit as a first-/last-mile service. The total share of transit (transit-only riders plus those who use transit in connection with first-/last-mile ridehailing) remains substantially flat as set against conventional ridehailing services, even if ridehailing fares decrease. On the other hand, when the ridehailing price is significantly reduced by automation, our analysis suggests a decline in total transit ridership and an increase in ridehailing, especially for solo ridehailing. Also, it was found that autonomous pooled ridehailing might not be as appealing to commuters as autonomous solo ridehailing.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/03611981211025278</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2108-7953</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8061-2100</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0344-2344</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2021-11, Vol.2675 (11), p.1154-1167
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_03611981211025278
source SAGE
title Analyzing the Effect of Autonomous Ridehailing on Transit Ridership: Competitor or Desirable First-/Last-Mile Connection?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T14%3A14%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analyzing%20the%20Effect%20of%20Autonomous%20Ridehailing%20on%20Transit%20Ridership:%20Competitor%20or%20Desirable%20First-/Last-Mile%20Connection?&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Khaloei,%20Moein&rft.date=2021-11-01&rft.volume=2675&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1154&rft.epage=1167&rft.pages=1154-1167&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03611981211025278&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_03611981211025278%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-4ba8557c609b19c22e7148c48416df31cb38c5f54bed075386eeafa7e43be3fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03611981211025278&rfr_iscdi=true