Loading…

Autonomous Vehicle Safe Operating Speeds on the Automated Skyway Express in Jacksonville, Florida

Autonomous vehicles (AV) differ significantly from traditional passenger vehicles in both their behavior and physical characteristics. As such, the validity of the guidance provided in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, Second Edition (MASH 2016) is questionable in AV applications. Impact ang...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transportation research record 2021-06, Vol.2675 (6), p.188-199
Main Authors: Loken, Andrew E., Steelman, Joshua S., Rosenbaugh, Scott K., Faller, Ronald K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1d8f67d5d88a5a1591295e8b810b1886b4f737ec385cbca5f401fa9647bef493
container_end_page 199
container_issue 6
container_start_page 188
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 2675
creator Loken, Andrew E.
Steelman, Joshua S.
Rosenbaugh, Scott K.
Faller, Ronald K.
description Autonomous vehicles (AV) differ significantly from traditional passenger vehicles in both their behavior and physical characteristics. As such, the validity of the guidance provided in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, Second Edition (MASH 2016) is questionable in AV applications. Impact angles, speeds, and vehicle weights specified in MASH 2016 are inextricably linked to the traditional vehicles underlying the estimates. For AV applications, these parameters must be estimated from the ground up, stepping outside the guidance of MASH 2016. In this paper, a conservative method for evaluating existing infrastructure to support AV traffic is proposed. The method integrates traditional structural analyses with unconventional methods of estimating impact conditions. This methodology was developed for the Jacksonville Transportation Authority, who, when faced with unique challenges in maintaining and expanding their Automated Skyway Express, opted to convert the system from monorail to AV traffic. Leading AV developers were surveyed to develop a portfolio of potential candidates for the conversion. Estimated impact conditions were then compared against the capacity of the system’s existing concrete parapets. Ultimately, safe operating speeds for each AV candidate were recommended on the bases of structural capacity and vehicle stability. All but one AV candidate were deemed capable of safely operating at the desired speed of 25 mph without any modifications to the barrier. Although the methodology was developed for a particular case, it is applicable to future implementations of AVs on existing infrastructure, provided the roadway is confined similarly to the Skyway deck.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/0361198121991834
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0361198121991834</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_0361198121991834</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_0361198121991834</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1d8f67d5d88a5a1591295e8b810b1886b4f737ec385cbca5f401fa9647bef493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhC0EEqWwM_oHEPAbO7E9VlXLh5A6FFgjx3ndpk3jyE6B_nsalQmJ6Ya753Q6Qm6B3QNI-cB4DqAVpKA1KC7OyCiFXCeCZek5GQ12MviX5CrGDWOcC8lHxEz2vW_9zu8j_cB1bRukS-OQLjoMpq_bFV12iFWkvqX9GumQ35keK7rcHr7Mgc6-u4Ax0rqlL8Zuo28_66bBOzpvfKgrc00unGki3vzqmLzPZ2_Tp-R18fg8nbwmNuWiT0qolMtllVVKmcxApiHVGapSAStBqbwUTnKJlqvMltZkTjBwRudCluiE5mPCTr02-BgDuqIL9c6EQwGsGC4q_l50RJITEs0Ki43fh_a48P_8D4oFZs4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Autonomous Vehicle Safe Operating Speeds on the Automated Skyway Express in Jacksonville, Florida</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Loken, Andrew E. ; Steelman, Joshua S. ; Rosenbaugh, Scott K. ; Faller, Ronald K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Loken, Andrew E. ; Steelman, Joshua S. ; Rosenbaugh, Scott K. ; Faller, Ronald K.</creatorcontrib><description>Autonomous vehicles (AV) differ significantly from traditional passenger vehicles in both their behavior and physical characteristics. As such, the validity of the guidance provided in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, Second Edition (MASH 2016) is questionable in AV applications. Impact angles, speeds, and vehicle weights specified in MASH 2016 are inextricably linked to the traditional vehicles underlying the estimates. For AV applications, these parameters must be estimated from the ground up, stepping outside the guidance of MASH 2016. In this paper, a conservative method for evaluating existing infrastructure to support AV traffic is proposed. The method integrates traditional structural analyses with unconventional methods of estimating impact conditions. This methodology was developed for the Jacksonville Transportation Authority, who, when faced with unique challenges in maintaining and expanding their Automated Skyway Express, opted to convert the system from monorail to AV traffic. Leading AV developers were surveyed to develop a portfolio of potential candidates for the conversion. Estimated impact conditions were then compared against the capacity of the system’s existing concrete parapets. Ultimately, safe operating speeds for each AV candidate were recommended on the bases of structural capacity and vehicle stability. All but one AV candidate were deemed capable of safely operating at the desired speed of 25 mph without any modifications to the barrier. Although the methodology was developed for a particular case, it is applicable to future implementations of AVs on existing infrastructure, provided the roadway is confined similarly to the Skyway deck.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-4052</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/0361198121991834</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2021-06, Vol.2675 (6), p.188-199</ispartof><rights>National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1d8f67d5d88a5a1591295e8b810b1886b4f737ec385cbca5f401fa9647bef493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loken, Andrew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steelman, Joshua S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaugh, Scott K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faller, Ronald K.</creatorcontrib><title>Autonomous Vehicle Safe Operating Speeds on the Automated Skyway Express in Jacksonville, Florida</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Autonomous vehicles (AV) differ significantly from traditional passenger vehicles in both their behavior and physical characteristics. As such, the validity of the guidance provided in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, Second Edition (MASH 2016) is questionable in AV applications. Impact angles, speeds, and vehicle weights specified in MASH 2016 are inextricably linked to the traditional vehicles underlying the estimates. For AV applications, these parameters must be estimated from the ground up, stepping outside the guidance of MASH 2016. In this paper, a conservative method for evaluating existing infrastructure to support AV traffic is proposed. The method integrates traditional structural analyses with unconventional methods of estimating impact conditions. This methodology was developed for the Jacksonville Transportation Authority, who, when faced with unique challenges in maintaining and expanding their Automated Skyway Express, opted to convert the system from monorail to AV traffic. Leading AV developers were surveyed to develop a portfolio of potential candidates for the conversion. Estimated impact conditions were then compared against the capacity of the system’s existing concrete parapets. Ultimately, safe operating speeds for each AV candidate were recommended on the bases of structural capacity and vehicle stability. All but one AV candidate were deemed capable of safely operating at the desired speed of 25 mph without any modifications to the barrier. Although the methodology was developed for a particular case, it is applicable to future implementations of AVs on existing infrastructure, provided the roadway is confined similarly to the Skyway deck.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><issn>2169-4052</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhC0EEqWwM_oHEPAbO7E9VlXLh5A6FFgjx3ndpk3jyE6B_nsalQmJ6Ya753Q6Qm6B3QNI-cB4DqAVpKA1KC7OyCiFXCeCZek5GQ12MviX5CrGDWOcC8lHxEz2vW_9zu8j_cB1bRukS-OQLjoMpq_bFV12iFWkvqX9GumQ35keK7rcHr7Mgc6-u4Ax0rqlL8Zuo28_66bBOzpvfKgrc00unGki3vzqmLzPZ2_Tp-R18fg8nbwmNuWiT0qolMtllVVKmcxApiHVGapSAStBqbwUTnKJlqvMltZkTjBwRudCluiE5mPCTr02-BgDuqIL9c6EQwGsGC4q_l50RJITEs0Ki43fh_a48P_8D4oFZs4</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Loken, Andrew E.</creator><creator>Steelman, Joshua S.</creator><creator>Rosenbaugh, Scott K.</creator><creator>Faller, Ronald K.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Autonomous Vehicle Safe Operating Speeds on the Automated Skyway Express in Jacksonville, Florida</title><author>Loken, Andrew E. ; Steelman, Joshua S. ; Rosenbaugh, Scott K. ; Faller, Ronald K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1d8f67d5d88a5a1591295e8b810b1886b4f737ec385cbca5f401fa9647bef493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loken, Andrew E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steelman, Joshua S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaugh, Scott K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faller, Ronald K.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loken, Andrew E.</au><au>Steelman, Joshua S.</au><au>Rosenbaugh, Scott K.</au><au>Faller, Ronald K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Autonomous Vehicle Safe Operating Speeds on the Automated Skyway Express in Jacksonville, Florida</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>2675</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>188</spage><epage>199</epage><pages>188-199</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><eissn>2169-4052</eissn><abstract>Autonomous vehicles (AV) differ significantly from traditional passenger vehicles in both their behavior and physical characteristics. As such, the validity of the guidance provided in the Manual for Assessing Safety Hardware, Second Edition (MASH 2016) is questionable in AV applications. Impact angles, speeds, and vehicle weights specified in MASH 2016 are inextricably linked to the traditional vehicles underlying the estimates. For AV applications, these parameters must be estimated from the ground up, stepping outside the guidance of MASH 2016. In this paper, a conservative method for evaluating existing infrastructure to support AV traffic is proposed. The method integrates traditional structural analyses with unconventional methods of estimating impact conditions. This methodology was developed for the Jacksonville Transportation Authority, who, when faced with unique challenges in maintaining and expanding their Automated Skyway Express, opted to convert the system from monorail to AV traffic. Leading AV developers were surveyed to develop a portfolio of potential candidates for the conversion. Estimated impact conditions were then compared against the capacity of the system’s existing concrete parapets. Ultimately, safe operating speeds for each AV candidate were recommended on the bases of structural capacity and vehicle stability. All but one AV candidate were deemed capable of safely operating at the desired speed of 25 mph without any modifications to the barrier. Although the methodology was developed for a particular case, it is applicable to future implementations of AVs on existing infrastructure, provided the roadway is confined similarly to the Skyway deck.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/0361198121991834</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2021-06, Vol.2675 (6), p.188-199
issn 0361-1981
2169-4052
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_0361198121991834
source Sage Journals Online
title Autonomous Vehicle Safe Operating Speeds on the Automated Skyway Express in Jacksonville, Florida
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T00%3A30%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Autonomous%20Vehicle%20Safe%20Operating%20Speeds%20on%20the%20Automated%20Skyway%20Express%20in%20Jacksonville,%20Florida&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Loken,%20Andrew%20E.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=2675&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=188&rft.epage=199&rft.pages=188-199&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft.eissn=2169-4052&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/0361198121991834&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_0361198121991834%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c234t-b1d8f67d5d88a5a1591295e8b810b1886b4f737ec385cbca5f401fa9647bef493%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_0361198121991834&rfr_iscdi=true