Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis

Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 p...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Urologia 2021-11, Vol.88 (4), p.343-347
Main Authors: Chiancone, Francesco, Fabiano, Marco, Meccariello, Clemente, Fedelini, Maurizio, Persico, Francesco, Fedelini, Paolo
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-87412055330e3124dc3f1673e30aa3a090ee44435715c7aef56627bdcb43fbce3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-87412055330e3124dc3f1673e30aa3a090ee44435715c7aef56627bdcb43fbce3
container_end_page 347
container_issue 4
container_start_page 343
container_title Urologia
container_volume 88
creator Chiancone, Francesco
Fabiano, Marco
Meccariello, Clemente
Fedelini, Maurizio
Persico, Francesco
Fedelini, Paolo
description Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time (p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy (p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins (p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss (p = 0.0205), intra-operative (p = 0.0104), and post-operative (p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time (p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (
doi_str_mv 10.1177/03915603211001677
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_03915603211001677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_03915603211001677</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_03915603211001677</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-87412055330e3124dc3f1673e30aa3a090ee44435715c7aef56627bdcb43fbce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtOwzAQtRBIVNADsJsLpIw_iSm7qnylSrCg68h1J02qJI7sFMgpOAeX4DCcBFdlh8RsRvN5b-Y9xi44TjjX-hLllKcZSsE5Is-0PmIjroVKMtTpMRvt58l-4ZSNQ9hijAyFEnLEPhamM94F67rKwiv5sAvgOmohtvvK1NBSV3qyvWsGKJyHviRoTGs21FDbgyugrDZlPYB1TVfTO3hqI6zfNc4HeKv6Ep5nN8sZxBue4Pvzi-M1xLJqNzWBjSTkIRLWQ6jCOTspTB1o_JvP2PLu9mX-kCye7h_ns0VihcY-udKKC0xTKZEkF2ptZRGFS5JojDQ4RSKllEw1T602VKRZJvRqbVdKFitL8ozxA6-N4oOnIu981Rg_5Bzzvan5H1MjZnLAhCg-37qdj0-HfwA_Jmt5VA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Chiancone, Francesco ; Fabiano, Marco ; Meccariello, Clemente ; Fedelini, Maurizio ; Persico, Francesco ; Fedelini, Paolo</creator><creatorcontrib>Chiancone, Francesco ; Fabiano, Marco ; Meccariello, Clemente ; Fedelini, Maurizio ; Persico, Francesco ; Fedelini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time (p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy (p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins (p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss (p = 0.0205), intra-operative (p = 0.0104), and post-operative (p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time (p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (&lt;0.0001) were significantly lower in Group B. The rate of enucleation and enucleoresection/polar resection was similar (p = 0.1821) among the groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative factors were not independently associated with the surgical approach. There was a statistically significant difference in complication rate (&lt;0.0001) between the two groups even if no significant difference in terms of grade ⩾3 post-operative complications (p = 0.3382) was detected. Discussion: LPN represents a feasible and safe approach for high complex renal tumors if performed in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. This procedure offers good intraoperative outcomes and a low rate of post-operative complications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0391-5603</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-6075</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/03915603211001677</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Urologia, 2021-11, Vol.88 (4), p.343-347</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-87412055330e3124dc3f1673e30aa3a090ee44435715c7aef56627bdcb43fbce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-87412055330e3124dc3f1673e30aa3a090ee44435715c7aef56627bdcb43fbce3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8648-3557</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906,79113</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chiancone, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiano, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meccariello, Clemente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedelini, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persico, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedelini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis</title><title>Urologia</title><description>Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time (p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy (p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins (p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss (p = 0.0205), intra-operative (p = 0.0104), and post-operative (p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time (p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (&lt;0.0001) were significantly lower in Group B. The rate of enucleation and enucleoresection/polar resection was similar (p = 0.1821) among the groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative factors were not independently associated with the surgical approach. There was a statistically significant difference in complication rate (&lt;0.0001) between the two groups even if no significant difference in terms of grade ⩾3 post-operative complications (p = 0.3382) was detected. Discussion: LPN represents a feasible and safe approach for high complex renal tumors if performed in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. This procedure offers good intraoperative outcomes and a low rate of post-operative complications.</description><issn>0391-5603</issn><issn>1724-6075</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEtOwzAQtRBIVNADsJsLpIw_iSm7qnylSrCg68h1J02qJI7sFMgpOAeX4DCcBFdlh8RsRvN5b-Y9xi44TjjX-hLllKcZSsE5Is-0PmIjroVKMtTpMRvt58l-4ZSNQ9hijAyFEnLEPhamM94F67rKwiv5sAvgOmohtvvK1NBSV3qyvWsGKJyHviRoTGs21FDbgyugrDZlPYB1TVfTO3hqI6zfNc4HeKv6Ep5nN8sZxBue4Pvzi-M1xLJqNzWBjSTkIRLWQ6jCOTspTB1o_JvP2PLu9mX-kCye7h_ns0VihcY-udKKC0xTKZEkF2ptZRGFS5JojDQ4RSKllEw1T602VKRZJvRqbVdKFitL8ozxA6-N4oOnIu981Rg_5Bzzvan5H1MjZnLAhCg-37qdj0-HfwA_Jmt5VA</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Chiancone, Francesco</creator><creator>Fabiano, Marco</creator><creator>Meccariello, Clemente</creator><creator>Fedelini, Maurizio</creator><creator>Persico, Francesco</creator><creator>Fedelini, Paolo</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8648-3557</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis</title><author>Chiancone, Francesco ; Fabiano, Marco ; Meccariello, Clemente ; Fedelini, Maurizio ; Persico, Francesco ; Fedelini, Paolo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-87412055330e3124dc3f1673e30aa3a090ee44435715c7aef56627bdcb43fbce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chiancone, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fabiano, Marco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meccariello, Clemente</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedelini, Maurizio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persico, Francesco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fedelini, Paolo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Urologia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chiancone, Francesco</au><au>Fabiano, Marco</au><au>Meccariello, Clemente</au><au>Fedelini, Maurizio</au><au>Persico, Francesco</au><au>Fedelini, Paolo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis</atitle><jtitle>Urologia</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>88</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>343</spage><epage>347</epage><pages>343-347</pages><issn>0391-5603</issn><eissn>1724-6075</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy (PN) for renal tumors of high surgical complexity (PADUA score ⩾10). Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 93 consecutive patients who underwent PN at our department from January 2015 to September 2019. 21 patients underwent open partial nephrectomy (OPN) (Group A) and 72 underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) (Group B). All OPNs were performed with a retroperitoneal approach, while all LPNs were performed with a transperitoneal approach by a single surgical team. Post-operative complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo system. Results: The two groups showed no difference in terms of patients’ demographics as well as tumor characteristics in all variables. Group A was found to be similar to group B in terms of operation time (p = 0.781), conversion to radical nephrectomy (p = 0.3485), and positive surgical margins (p = 0.338) while estimated blood loss (p = 0.0205), intra-operative (p = 0.0104), and post-operative (p = 0.0081) transfusion rates, drainage time (p = 0.0012), pain score at post-operative day 1 (&lt;0.0001) were significantly lower in Group B. The rate of enucleation and enucleoresection/polar resection was similar (p = 0.1821) among the groups. Logistic regression analysis indicated that preoperative factors were not independently associated with the surgical approach. There was a statistically significant difference in complication rate (&lt;0.0001) between the two groups even if no significant difference in terms of grade ⩾3 post-operative complications (p = 0.3382) was detected. Discussion: LPN represents a feasible and safe approach for high complex renal tumors if performed in highly experienced laparoscopic centers. This procedure offers good intraoperative outcomes and a low rate of post-operative complications.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/03915603211001677</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8648-3557</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0391-5603
ispartof Urologia, 2021-11, Vol.88 (4), p.343-347
issn 0391-5603
1724-6075
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_03915603211001677
source Sage Journals Online
title Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for the management of highly complex renal tumors with PADUA score ⩾10: A single center analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T05%3A23%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20versus%20open%20partial%20nephrectomy%20for%20the%20management%20of%20highly%20complex%20renal%20tumors%20with%20PADUA%20score%20%E2%A9%BE10:%20A%20single%20center%20analysis&rft.jtitle=Urologia&rft.au=Chiancone,%20Francesco&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=88&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=343&rft.epage=347&rft.pages=343-347&rft.issn=0391-5603&rft.eissn=1724-6075&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/03915603211001677&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_03915603211001677%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-87412055330e3124dc3f1673e30aa3a090ee44435715c7aef56627bdcb43fbce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_03915603211001677&rfr_iscdi=true