Loading…
State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have An Impact?
Using data compiled for the 50 states, this study examines state discretion in welfare programs by defining a set of programs that, in 1995, gave considerable discretion to the states and a set of programs that did not. It explores the effect of nonprofits on discretionary and non-discretionary prog...
Saved in:
Published in: | Public administration quarterly 2005-06, Vol.29 (2), p.231-262 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c836-e32a6c286fa850619fd7e3d2d0268a1522542d2e8281393e271f8613261cbbf33 |
container_end_page | 262 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 231 |
container_title | Public administration quarterly |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Burbridge, Lynn C. |
description | Using data compiled for the 50 states, this study examines state discretion in welfare programs by defining a set of programs that, in 1995, gave considerable discretion to the states and a set of programs that did not. It explores the effect of nonprofits on discretionary and non-discretionary programs. The study finds that the categorization of programs by degree of discretion is problematic at best, given different forms and avenues for discretion. It also finds that the nonprofit sector had its biggest impact on programs with the most mandates from the federal government. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/073491490502900206 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_073491490502900206</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_073491490502900206</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_073491490502900206</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c836-e32a6c286fa850619fd7e3d2d0268a1522542d2e8281393e271f8613261cbbf33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNFKwzAYhYMoWKcv4FVeoC75k6apNzI6dYOhFxt4WbL2z8jYkpJUwbd3Zd4JXp2b7zscDiH3nD1wXpZTVgpZcVmxgkHFGDB1QTIQUOZSCnFJshHIR-Ka3KS0Z4yDlDoj9XowA9K5S23EwQVPnacfeLAmIl336Dvnd490Huhb8H0M1g2JLswX0pmny2Nv2uHpllxZc0h495sTsnl53tSLfPX-uqxnq7zVQuUowKgWtLJGF0zxynYlig46BkobXgAUEjpADZqLSiCU3GrFBSjebrdWiAmBc20bQ0oRbdNHdzTxu-GsGV9o_r5wkqZnKZkdNvvwGf1p4n_GD9oxWmQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have An Impact?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Politics Collection</source><creator>Burbridge, Lynn C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Burbridge, Lynn C.</creatorcontrib><description>Using data compiled for the 50 states, this study examines state discretion in welfare programs by defining a set of programs that, in 1995, gave considerable discretion to the states and a set of programs that did not. It explores the effect of nonprofits on discretionary and non-discretionary programs. The study finds that the categorization of programs by degree of discretion is problematic at best, given different forms and avenues for discretion. It also finds that the nonprofit sector had its biggest impact on programs with the most mandates from the federal government.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0734-9149</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-4433</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/073491490502900206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Public administration quarterly, 2005-06, Vol.29 (2), p.231-262</ispartof><rights>2005 Southern Public Administration Education Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c836-e32a6c286fa850619fd7e3d2d0268a1522542d2e8281393e271f8613261cbbf33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Burbridge, Lynn C.</creatorcontrib><title>State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have An Impact?</title><title>Public administration quarterly</title><description>Using data compiled for the 50 states, this study examines state discretion in welfare programs by defining a set of programs that, in 1995, gave considerable discretion to the states and a set of programs that did not. It explores the effect of nonprofits on discretionary and non-discretionary programs. The study finds that the categorization of programs by degree of discretion is problematic at best, given different forms and avenues for discretion. It also finds that the nonprofit sector had its biggest impact on programs with the most mandates from the federal government.</description><issn>0734-9149</issn><issn>2327-4433</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNFKwzAYhYMoWKcv4FVeoC75k6apNzI6dYOhFxt4WbL2z8jYkpJUwbd3Zd4JXp2b7zscDiH3nD1wXpZTVgpZcVmxgkHFGDB1QTIQUOZSCnFJshHIR-Ka3KS0Z4yDlDoj9XowA9K5S23EwQVPnacfeLAmIl336Dvnd490Huhb8H0M1g2JLswX0pmny2Nv2uHpllxZc0h495sTsnl53tSLfPX-uqxnq7zVQuUowKgWtLJGF0zxynYlig46BkobXgAUEjpADZqLSiCU3GrFBSjebrdWiAmBc20bQ0oRbdNHdzTxu-GsGV9o_r5wkqZnKZkdNvvwGf1p4n_GD9oxWmQ</recordid><startdate>200506</startdate><enddate>200506</enddate><creator>Burbridge, Lynn C.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200506</creationdate><title>State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have An Impact?</title><author>Burbridge, Lynn C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c836-e32a6c286fa850619fd7e3d2d0268a1522542d2e8281393e271f8613261cbbf33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Burbridge, Lynn C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Public administration quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Burbridge, Lynn C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have An Impact?</atitle><jtitle>Public administration quarterly</jtitle><date>2005-06</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>231</spage><epage>262</epage><pages>231-262</pages><issn>0734-9149</issn><eissn>2327-4433</eissn><abstract>Using data compiled for the 50 states, this study examines state discretion in welfare programs by defining a set of programs that, in 1995, gave considerable discretion to the states and a set of programs that did not. It explores the effect of nonprofits on discretionary and non-discretionary programs. The study finds that the categorization of programs by degree of discretion is problematic at best, given different forms and avenues for discretion. It also finds that the nonprofit sector had its biggest impact on programs with the most mandates from the federal government.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/073491490502900206</doi><tpages>32</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0734-9149 |
ispartof | Public administration quarterly, 2005-06, Vol.29 (2), p.231-262 |
issn | 0734-9149 2327-4433 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_073491490502900206 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection; Social Science Premium Collection; ABI/INFORM Global; Politics Collection |
title | State Discretion in Welfare Spending: Do Nonprofits Have An Impact? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T04%3A14%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=State%20Discretion%20in%20Welfare%20Spending:%20Do%20Nonprofits%20Have%20An%20Impact?&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20quarterly&rft.au=Burbridge,%20Lynn%20C.&rft.date=2005-06&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=231&rft.epage=262&rft.pages=231-262&rft.issn=0734-9149&rft.eissn=2327-4433&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/073491490502900206&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_073491490502900206%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c836-e32a6c286fa850619fd7e3d2d0268a1522542d2e8281393e271f8613261cbbf33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_073491490502900206&rfr_iscdi=true |