Loading…

Accuracy of 4 Free Online Dosing Calculators in Predicting the Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Calculated Using a 2-Point Pharmacokinetic Approach

Background: Free online adaptive vancomycin dosing calculators are available to estimate area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), but the accuracy of predicting vancomycin AUC using these calculators compared with using a 2-point pharmacokinetic approach has not been described. Objective: To e...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Annals of pharmacotherapy 2023-04, Vol.57 (4), p.432-440
Main Authors: Belz, Sarah N., Seabury, Robert W., Steele, Jeffrey M., Darko, William, Miller, Christopher D., Probst, Luke A., Kufel, Wesley D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Free online adaptive vancomycin dosing calculators are available to estimate area under the concentration-time curve (AUC), but the accuracy of predicting vancomycin AUC using these calculators compared with using a 2-point pharmacokinetic approach has not been described. Objective: To evaluate the accuracy of calculator-predicted AUC (cpAUC) using 4 free online calculators compared with reference AUC (rAUC), and to assess pharmacists’ impressions of the ease of use. Methods: Vancomycin AUC was estimated using (1) the reference method via the Sawchuk-Zaske method and linear-logarithmic trapezoidal rule using 2 steady-state postdistributional vancomycin serum concentrations and (2) 4 free online vancomycin dosing calculators including ClinCalc, VancoPK, TDMx, and DMC. Accuracy was calculated by dividing cpAUC by rAUC. Ease of cpAUC estimation was determined by using a 10-point Likert scale. Results: All 4 calculators had a median cpAUC accuracy ranging from 89% to 110%. Concordance between cpAUC and rAUC determinations of AUC 600 mg·h/L occurred 63.3% to 71.4% and 74.5% to 78.6% of the time, respectively. Pharmacist investigators agreed that ClinCalc and VancoPK calculators were easiest to use. Conclusion and Relevance: cpAUC accuracy varied among the 4 calculators, but all consistently identified patients with an rAUC 600 mg·h/L at comparable frequencies. All 4 calculators demonstrated some imprecision based on their wide 95% CIs and potential inaccuracies in predicting an rAUC 600 mg·h/L. Clin Calc and VancoPK were most user friendly based on our pharmacists’ impressions.
ISSN:1060-0280
1542-6270
DOI:10.1177/10600280221117256