Loading…

Investigation of bending behavior of two and three-dimensional honeycomb and auxetic sandwich beams

The bending behavior of two (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) sandwich beams that have a negative Poisson’s ratio (auxetic) and conventional honeycomb was investigated for different geometries, sheet thicknesses, and cell thicknesses. The re-entrant and solid specimens were produced with a stereolitho...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The journal of sandwich structures & materials 2024-09, Vol.26 (6), p.945-968
Main Authors: Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes, Kanber, Bahattin, Dağlı, Salih
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-ba00894baba0e6b0fe809e89745d289381e48991a0efdf5fab4b3c3c0d5a92e13
container_end_page 968
container_issue 6
container_start_page 945
container_title The journal of sandwich structures & materials
container_volume 26
creator Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes
Kanber, Bahattin
Dağlı, Salih
description The bending behavior of two (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) sandwich beams that have a negative Poisson’s ratio (auxetic) and conventional honeycomb was investigated for different geometries, sheet thicknesses, and cell thicknesses. The re-entrant and solid specimens were produced with a stereolithographic (SLA) 3D printer and subjected to a three-point bending test under the conditions specified in the ASTM C393 standard. The data obtained from the tests were used to verify finite element analysis (FEA) results. The radius of curvatures was calculated for each specimen depending on the load step. In addition, Poisson’s ratio was calculated for each auxetic sample. As a result, the 3D arrowhead beam, with a cell thickness of 1 mm and a sheet thickness of 2 mm, exhibits peak force values that are 497.340% and 461.500% higher than re-entrant and missing rib beams, respectively. Besides, the maximum strain energy values of same 3D arrowhead specimens (596.120 mJ) are higher than re-entrant (101.032 mJ) and missing rib (108.201 mJ) specimens. It was determined that the arrowhead is the most durable structure compared to other auxetic structure geometries. Therefore, when arrowhead and honeycomb 3D beams are compared, it was observed that the maximum strain energy of arrowhead specimens was higher in both horizontal (84.310%) and perpendicular (131.910%) positioned specimens. Comparing the arrowhead and honeycomb 2D beams with the highest maximum strain energy, it can be concluded that the arrowhead beam absorbs 20.000% more energy.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/10996362241257871
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_10996362241257871</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_10996362241257871</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_10996362241257871</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-ba00894baba0e6b0fe809e89745d289381e48991a0efdf5fab4b3c3c0d5a92e13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMIHcMsPpHhLbB9RxVKpEhc4R44zTlw1NrLTlv49LuWGxGnezFukeQjdE7wgRIgHgpWqWU0pJ7QSUpALNCMVw6VQgl5mnPnyJLhGNyltMKaE83qGzMrvIU2u15MLvgi2aMF3zvd5DnrvQjzdpkMotO-KaYgAZedG8CnL9bYYgoejCWP7w-vdF0zOFCkvB2eGHKLHdIuurN4muPudc_Tx_PS-fC3Xby-r5eO6NJTVU9lqjKXirc4A6hZbkFiBVIJXHZWKSQJcKkUyaztbWd3ylhlmcFdpRYGwOSLnXBNDShFs8xndqOOxIbg5tdT8aSl7FmdP0j00m7CL-av0j-Ebpqhpcg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of bending behavior of two and three-dimensional honeycomb and auxetic sandwich beams</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes ; Kanber, Bahattin ; Dağlı, Salih</creator><creatorcontrib>Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes ; Kanber, Bahattin ; Dağlı, Salih</creatorcontrib><description>The bending behavior of two (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) sandwich beams that have a negative Poisson’s ratio (auxetic) and conventional honeycomb was investigated for different geometries, sheet thicknesses, and cell thicknesses. The re-entrant and solid specimens were produced with a stereolithographic (SLA) 3D printer and subjected to a three-point bending test under the conditions specified in the ASTM C393 standard. The data obtained from the tests were used to verify finite element analysis (FEA) results. The radius of curvatures was calculated for each specimen depending on the load step. In addition, Poisson’s ratio was calculated for each auxetic sample. As a result, the 3D arrowhead beam, with a cell thickness of 1 mm and a sheet thickness of 2 mm, exhibits peak force values that are 497.340% and 461.500% higher than re-entrant and missing rib beams, respectively. Besides, the maximum strain energy values of same 3D arrowhead specimens (596.120 mJ) are higher than re-entrant (101.032 mJ) and missing rib (108.201 mJ) specimens. It was determined that the arrowhead is the most durable structure compared to other auxetic structure geometries. Therefore, when arrowhead and honeycomb 3D beams are compared, it was observed that the maximum strain energy of arrowhead specimens was higher in both horizontal (84.310%) and perpendicular (131.910%) positioned specimens. Comparing the arrowhead and honeycomb 2D beams with the highest maximum strain energy, it can be concluded that the arrowhead beam absorbs 20.000% more energy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1099-6362</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1530-7972</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/10996362241257871</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>The journal of sandwich structures &amp; materials, 2024-09, Vol.26 (6), p.945-968</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-ba00894baba0e6b0fe809e89745d289381e48991a0efdf5fab4b3c3c0d5a92e13</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2115-2487</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanber, Bahattin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dağlı, Salih</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of bending behavior of two and three-dimensional honeycomb and auxetic sandwich beams</title><title>The journal of sandwich structures &amp; materials</title><description>The bending behavior of two (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) sandwich beams that have a negative Poisson’s ratio (auxetic) and conventional honeycomb was investigated for different geometries, sheet thicknesses, and cell thicknesses. The re-entrant and solid specimens were produced with a stereolithographic (SLA) 3D printer and subjected to a three-point bending test under the conditions specified in the ASTM C393 standard. The data obtained from the tests were used to verify finite element analysis (FEA) results. The radius of curvatures was calculated for each specimen depending on the load step. In addition, Poisson’s ratio was calculated for each auxetic sample. As a result, the 3D arrowhead beam, with a cell thickness of 1 mm and a sheet thickness of 2 mm, exhibits peak force values that are 497.340% and 461.500% higher than re-entrant and missing rib beams, respectively. Besides, the maximum strain energy values of same 3D arrowhead specimens (596.120 mJ) are higher than re-entrant (101.032 mJ) and missing rib (108.201 mJ) specimens. It was determined that the arrowhead is the most durable structure compared to other auxetic structure geometries. Therefore, when arrowhead and honeycomb 3D beams are compared, it was observed that the maximum strain energy of arrowhead specimens was higher in both horizontal (84.310%) and perpendicular (131.910%) positioned specimens. Comparing the arrowhead and honeycomb 2D beams with the highest maximum strain energy, it can be concluded that the arrowhead beam absorbs 20.000% more energy.</description><issn>1099-6362</issn><issn>1530-7972</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UMlOwzAQtRBIlMIHcMsPpHhLbB9RxVKpEhc4R44zTlw1NrLTlv49LuWGxGnezFukeQjdE7wgRIgHgpWqWU0pJ7QSUpALNCMVw6VQgl5mnPnyJLhGNyltMKaE83qGzMrvIU2u15MLvgi2aMF3zvd5DnrvQjzdpkMotO-KaYgAZedG8CnL9bYYgoejCWP7w-vdF0zOFCkvB2eGHKLHdIuurN4muPudc_Tx_PS-fC3Xby-r5eO6NJTVU9lqjKXirc4A6hZbkFiBVIJXHZWKSQJcKkUyaztbWd3ylhlmcFdpRYGwOSLnXBNDShFs8xndqOOxIbg5tdT8aSl7FmdP0j00m7CL-av0j-Ebpqhpcg</recordid><startdate>20240901</startdate><enddate>20240901</enddate><creator>Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes</creator><creator>Kanber, Bahattin</creator><creator>Dağlı, Salih</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-2487</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240901</creationdate><title>Investigation of bending behavior of two and three-dimensional honeycomb and auxetic sandwich beams</title><author>Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes ; Kanber, Bahattin ; Dağlı, Salih</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-ba00894baba0e6b0fe809e89745d289381e48991a0efdf5fab4b3c3c0d5a92e13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kanber, Bahattin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dağlı, Salih</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The journal of sandwich structures &amp; materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yazıcı, Mustafa Enes</au><au>Kanber, Bahattin</au><au>Dağlı, Salih</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of bending behavior of two and three-dimensional honeycomb and auxetic sandwich beams</atitle><jtitle>The journal of sandwich structures &amp; materials</jtitle><date>2024-09-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>945</spage><epage>968</epage><pages>945-968</pages><issn>1099-6362</issn><eissn>1530-7972</eissn><abstract>The bending behavior of two (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) sandwich beams that have a negative Poisson’s ratio (auxetic) and conventional honeycomb was investigated for different geometries, sheet thicknesses, and cell thicknesses. The re-entrant and solid specimens were produced with a stereolithographic (SLA) 3D printer and subjected to a three-point bending test under the conditions specified in the ASTM C393 standard. The data obtained from the tests were used to verify finite element analysis (FEA) results. The radius of curvatures was calculated for each specimen depending on the load step. In addition, Poisson’s ratio was calculated for each auxetic sample. As a result, the 3D arrowhead beam, with a cell thickness of 1 mm and a sheet thickness of 2 mm, exhibits peak force values that are 497.340% and 461.500% higher than re-entrant and missing rib beams, respectively. Besides, the maximum strain energy values of same 3D arrowhead specimens (596.120 mJ) are higher than re-entrant (101.032 mJ) and missing rib (108.201 mJ) specimens. It was determined that the arrowhead is the most durable structure compared to other auxetic structure geometries. Therefore, when arrowhead and honeycomb 3D beams are compared, it was observed that the maximum strain energy of arrowhead specimens was higher in both horizontal (84.310%) and perpendicular (131.910%) positioned specimens. Comparing the arrowhead and honeycomb 2D beams with the highest maximum strain energy, it can be concluded that the arrowhead beam absorbs 20.000% more energy.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/10996362241257871</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2115-2487</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1099-6362
ispartof The journal of sandwich structures & materials, 2024-09, Vol.26 (6), p.945-968
issn 1099-6362
1530-7972
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_10996362241257871
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)
title Investigation of bending behavior of two and three-dimensional honeycomb and auxetic sandwich beams
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T14%3A20%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20bending%20behavior%20of%20two%20and%20three-dimensional%20honeycomb%20and%20auxetic%20sandwich%20beams&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20sandwich%20structures%20&%20materials&rft.au=Yaz%C4%B1c%C4%B1,%20Mustafa%20Enes&rft.date=2024-09-01&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=945&rft.epage=968&rft.pages=945-968&rft.issn=1099-6362&rft.eissn=1530-7972&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/10996362241257871&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_10996362241257871%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-ba00894baba0e6b0fe809e89745d289381e48991a0efdf5fab4b3c3c0d5a92e13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_10996362241257871&rfr_iscdi=true