Loading…

Impaction allografting for femoral revision hip arthroplasty. Mid-term results after minimum five year follow-up in 46 cases

Previously, only short-term follow-up results after femoral revision using impacted allograft and cemented stems the exchange technique have been published. We present the results of 46 femoral exchange revision procedures performed on 42 patients with five to nine years follow-up. At follow-up, fiv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hip international 2002-10, Vol.12 (4), p.357-364
Main Authors: Lind, M, Krarup, N, Petersen, L G, Mikkelsen, S, Hrlyck, E
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Previously, only short-term follow-up results after femoral revision using impacted allograft and cemented stems the exchange technique have been published. We present the results of 46 femoral exchange revision procedures performed on 42 patients with five to nine years follow-up. At follow-up, five patients had died and two patients did not complete follow-up. Two patients were re-revised. One patient underwent re-revision due to early collapse of the impaction construct. In another patient, stem loosening due to acetabular revision occurred and a full re-revision of the impaction area was performed. One patient suffered late post-operative femoral fracture and three patients experienced hip dislocations. Ninety percent expressed satisfaction with the result. Harris Hip Score (HHS) improved from 36 to 82 (p < 0.001). Radiographically, one patient demonstrated stem subsidence of greater than 5mm. Eighty-six percent demonstrated signs of graft incorporation and only one patient demonstrated signs of loosening. Our results after a minimum of five years follow-up of patients surgically treated with the exchange femoral revision technique demonstrated good clinical and radiological results. With a re-revision rate of 4.3%, one case with subsidence exceeding 5 mm and one case with diaphyseal fracture, we did not observe the problems of subsidence and femoral fractures described in previous studies. (Hip International 2002; 4: 357-64).
ISSN:1120-7000
1724-6067
DOI:10.1177/112070000201200402