Managing competing organizational priorities in clinical handover across organizational boundaries

• Published in: Journal of health services research & policy 2015-01, Vol.20 (1_suppl), p.17-25
• Main Authors: Sujan, Mark A, Chessum, Peter, Rudd, Michelle, Fitton, Laurence, Inada-Kim, Matthew, Cooke, Matthew W, Spurgeon, Peter
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Original Research
• ISSN: 1355-8196; 1758-1060
• DOI: 10.1177/1355819614560449

Objectives: Handover across care boundaries poses additional challenges due to the different professional, organizational and cultural backgrounds of the participants involved. This paper provides a qualitative account of how practitioners in emergency care attempt to align their different individual and organizational priorities and backgrounds when handing over patients across care boundaries (ambulance service to emergency department (ED), and ED to acute medicine). Methods: A total of 270 clinical handovers were observed in three emergency care pathways involving five participating NHS organizations (two ambulance services and three hospitals). Half-day process mapping sessions were conducted for each pathway. Semi-structured interviews were carried out with 39 participants and analysed thematically. Results: The management of patient flow and the fulfilment of time-related performance targets can create conflicting priorities for practitioners during handover. Practitioners involved in handover manage such competing organizational priorities through additional coordination effort and dynamic trade-offs. Practitioners perceive greater collaboration across departments and organizations, and mutual awareness of each other's goals and constraints as possible ways towards more sustainable improvement. Conclusion: Sustainable improvement in handover across boundaries in emergency care might require commitment by leaders from all parts of the local health economy to work as partners to establish a culture of integrated, patient-centred care.