Loading…
L2 learners’ pragmatic output in a face-to-face vs. a computer-guided role-play task: Implications for TBLT
Accomplishing oral interactive workplace tasks requires various language abilities, including pragmatics. While technology-mediated tasks are thought to offer many possibilities for teaching and assessing second language (L2) pragmatics, their effectiveness – especially those facilitated by an AI ag...
Saved in:
Published in: | Language teaching research : LTR 2023-08 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-327bae9c06fa91b28d47de4337616b2db1b182f6aa8bb5b24160ec2181ec98133 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-327bae9c06fa91b28d47de4337616b2db1b182f6aa8bb5b24160ec2181ec98133 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Language teaching research : LTR |
container_volume | |
creator | Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika Dombi, Judit Sydorenko, Tetyana Sasayama, Shoko |
description | Accomplishing oral interactive workplace tasks requires various language abilities, including pragmatics. While technology-mediated tasks are thought to offer many possibilities for teaching and assessing second language (L2) pragmatics, their effectiveness – especially those facilitated by an AI agent (artificial intelligence agent) – remains to be explored. This study investigated how 47 tertiary-level learners of English as a second language (ESL) performed on an oral interactive task that required them to make requests to their boss in two distinct modalities. Each participant completed the same task with a fully automated AI agent and with a human interlocutor in a face-to-face format. Findings showed that both modalities elicited language use relevant to the pragmatics target. However, fully automated interactions were found to be more transactional, while face-to-face interactions were more functionally oriented (e.g. more frequent/varied supportive moves). Although fully automated interactive tasks may be useful for eliciting requests, replicating human-to-human interactions remains a challenge. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/13621688231188310 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_13621688231188310</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_13621688231188310</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_13621688231188310</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-327bae9c06fa91b28d47de4337616b2db1b182f6aa8bb5b24160ec2181ec98133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHa-gIvHTm2HHVRQKkViU9aR7ThVShJHdoLUHdfgepwEV2WHxOqP5s_7Gn2EboEuAKS8Ay4YCKUYB1CKAz1DM8ikJDRfZudpTj45Hlyiqxj3lFK-pHyGuoLh1unQuxC_P7_wEPSu02NjsZ_GYRpx02ONa20dGT05Kv6Ii7Syvku2C2Q3NZWrcPCtI0OrD3jU8f0eb7qhbWxK8n3EtQ94-1hsr9FFrdvobn51jt6en7arF1K8rjerh4JYprKRcCaNdrmlotY5GKaqTFYu41wKEIZVBgwoVgutlTFLwzIQ1FkGCpzNFXA-R3DKtcHHGFxdDqHpdDiUQMtjX-WfvhKzODFR71y591Po04v_AD9fjWta</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>L2 learners’ pragmatic output in a face-to-face vs. a computer-guided role-play task: Implications for TBLT</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika ; Dombi, Judit ; Sydorenko, Tetyana ; Sasayama, Shoko</creator><creatorcontrib>Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika ; Dombi, Judit ; Sydorenko, Tetyana ; Sasayama, Shoko</creatorcontrib><description>Accomplishing oral interactive workplace tasks requires various language abilities, including pragmatics. While technology-mediated tasks are thought to offer many possibilities for teaching and assessing second language (L2) pragmatics, their effectiveness – especially those facilitated by an AI agent (artificial intelligence agent) – remains to be explored. This study investigated how 47 tertiary-level learners of English as a second language (ESL) performed on an oral interactive task that required them to make requests to their boss in two distinct modalities. Each participant completed the same task with a fully automated AI agent and with a human interlocutor in a face-to-face format. Findings showed that both modalities elicited language use relevant to the pragmatics target. However, fully automated interactions were found to be more transactional, while face-to-face interactions were more functionally oriented (e.g. more frequent/varied supportive moves). Although fully automated interactive tasks may be useful for eliciting requests, replicating human-to-human interactions remains a challenge.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1362-1688</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0954</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/13621688231188310</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Language teaching research : LTR, 2023-08</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-327bae9c06fa91b28d47de4337616b2db1b182f6aa8bb5b24160ec2181ec98133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-327bae9c06fa91b28d47de4337616b2db1b182f6aa8bb5b24160ec2181ec98133</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8757-8881</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,79110</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dombi, Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydorenko, Tetyana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasayama, Shoko</creatorcontrib><title>L2 learners’ pragmatic output in a face-to-face vs. a computer-guided role-play task: Implications for TBLT</title><title>Language teaching research : LTR</title><description>Accomplishing oral interactive workplace tasks requires various language abilities, including pragmatics. While technology-mediated tasks are thought to offer many possibilities for teaching and assessing second language (L2) pragmatics, their effectiveness – especially those facilitated by an AI agent (artificial intelligence agent) – remains to be explored. This study investigated how 47 tertiary-level learners of English as a second language (ESL) performed on an oral interactive task that required them to make requests to their boss in two distinct modalities. Each participant completed the same task with a fully automated AI agent and with a human interlocutor in a face-to-face format. Findings showed that both modalities elicited language use relevant to the pragmatics target. However, fully automated interactions were found to be more transactional, while face-to-face interactions were more functionally oriented (e.g. more frequent/varied supportive moves). Although fully automated interactive tasks may be useful for eliciting requests, replicating human-to-human interactions remains a challenge.</description><issn>1362-1688</issn><issn>1477-0954</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFOwzAQRS0EEqVwAHa-gIvHTm2HHVRQKkViU9aR7ThVShJHdoLUHdfgepwEV2WHxOqP5s_7Gn2EboEuAKS8Ay4YCKUYB1CKAz1DM8ikJDRfZudpTj45Hlyiqxj3lFK-pHyGuoLh1unQuxC_P7_wEPSu02NjsZ_GYRpx02ONa20dGT05Kv6Ii7Syvku2C2Q3NZWrcPCtI0OrD3jU8f0eb7qhbWxK8n3EtQ94-1hsr9FFrdvobn51jt6en7arF1K8rjerh4JYprKRcCaNdrmlotY5GKaqTFYu41wKEIZVBgwoVgutlTFLwzIQ1FkGCpzNFXA-R3DKtcHHGFxdDqHpdDiUQMtjX-WfvhKzODFR71y591Po04v_AD9fjWta</recordid><startdate>20230802</startdate><enddate>20230802</enddate><creator>Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika</creator><creator>Dombi, Judit</creator><creator>Sydorenko, Tetyana</creator><creator>Sasayama, Shoko</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8757-8881</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230802</creationdate><title>L2 learners’ pragmatic output in a face-to-face vs. a computer-guided role-play task: Implications for TBLT</title><author>Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika ; Dombi, Judit ; Sydorenko, Tetyana ; Sasayama, Shoko</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-327bae9c06fa91b28d47de4337616b2db1b182f6aa8bb5b24160ec2181ec98133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dombi, Judit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sydorenko, Tetyana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sasayama, Shoko</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Language teaching research : LTR</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Timpe-Laughlin, Veronika</au><au>Dombi, Judit</au><au>Sydorenko, Tetyana</au><au>Sasayama, Shoko</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>L2 learners’ pragmatic output in a face-to-face vs. a computer-guided role-play task: Implications for TBLT</atitle><jtitle>Language teaching research : LTR</jtitle><date>2023-08-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issn>1362-1688</issn><eissn>1477-0954</eissn><abstract>Accomplishing oral interactive workplace tasks requires various language abilities, including pragmatics. While technology-mediated tasks are thought to offer many possibilities for teaching and assessing second language (L2) pragmatics, their effectiveness – especially those facilitated by an AI agent (artificial intelligence agent) – remains to be explored. This study investigated how 47 tertiary-level learners of English as a second language (ESL) performed on an oral interactive task that required them to make requests to their boss in two distinct modalities. Each participant completed the same task with a fully automated AI agent and with a human interlocutor in a face-to-face format. Findings showed that both modalities elicited language use relevant to the pragmatics target. However, fully automated interactions were found to be more transactional, while face-to-face interactions were more functionally oriented (e.g. more frequent/varied supportive moves). Although fully automated interactive tasks may be useful for eliciting requests, replicating human-to-human interactions remains a challenge.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/13621688231188310</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8757-8881</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1362-1688 |
ispartof | Language teaching research : LTR, 2023-08 |
issn | 1362-1688 1477-0954 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_13621688231188310 |
source | SAGE |
title | L2 learners’ pragmatic output in a face-to-face vs. a computer-guided role-play task: Implications for TBLT |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T07%3A24%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=L2%20learners%E2%80%99%20pragmatic%20output%20in%20a%20face-to-face%20vs.%20a%20computer-guided%20role-play%20task:%20Implications%20for%20TBLT&rft.jtitle=Language%20teaching%20research%20:%20LTR&rft.au=Timpe-Laughlin,%20Veronika&rft.date=2023-08-02&rft.issn=1362-1688&rft.eissn=1477-0954&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/13621688231188310&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_13621688231188310%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-327bae9c06fa91b28d47de4337616b2db1b182f6aa8bb5b24160ec2181ec98133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_13621688231188310&rfr_iscdi=true |