Loading…

Design of precast UHPFRC retaining walls – Experimental and numerical validations

This paper focuses on the design as well as on the experimental and numerical validations of the mechanical behavior of a precast ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) retaining walls. The design, made in accordance with the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CSA S6, 2019), led...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in structural engineering 2024-07, Vol.27 (10), p.1700-1716
Main Authors: Sylvestre, Danny, Charron, Jean-Philippe, Massicotte, Bruno
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper focuses on the design as well as on the experimental and numerical validations of the mechanical behavior of a precast ultra-high performance fibre reinforced concrete (UHPFRC) retaining walls. The design, made in accordance with the Canadian Highway Bridge Design Code (CSA S6, 2019), led to the fabrication of a full-scale UHPFRC retaining wall with 3% fibre content which had dimensions of 3 m in height, 2 m in length, 2 m in width, with two vertical and horizontal stiffeners, and very thin vertical and horizontal panels of 40 and 65 mm, respectively. The experimental tests showed that the UHPFRC retaining wall exceeded by 42% the ultimate limit state (ULS) design factored bending moment and showed a very ductile behavior under flexural loading. At service limit state (SLS), the retaining wall had maximum crack opening between 0.15 and 0.28 mm, and a maximum lateral displacement of 4 mm. The finite-element model developed for the application captured accurately the flexural behavior of the UHPFRC retaining wall and was used later in parametric studies to optimize the design. The retaining wall optimal design includes UHPFRC with 3% fibre content and stiffeners with variable cross-section which allows volume reductions of 73% for concrete and 86% for rebars in comparison to the conventional reinforced concrete design.
ISSN:1369-4332
2048-4011
DOI:10.1177/13694332231222087