Loading…

Using Multiple Sources of Data to Gauge Outcome Differences Between Academic-Themed and Transition-Themed First-Year Seminars

Students in two different types of first-year experience seminar courses at a moderately sized public university were compared using a large variety of measures—both direct and indirect. One of these first-year experience types was a three-credit academic-themed course offered in sections with varia...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of college student retention : Research, theory & practice theory & practice, 2016-05, Vol.18 (1), p.68-82
Main Authors: Zerr, Ryan J., Bjerke, Elizabeth
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Students in two different types of first-year experience seminar courses at a moderately sized public university were compared using a large variety of measures—both direct and indirect. One of these first-year experience types was a three-credit academic-themed course offered in sections with variable content; the other was a two-credit transition-themed course. In terms of direct measures such as retention to the second year, first-year grade point average, and number of earned credits during the first year, no significant differences were found. The academic-themed seminar did rate significantly better according to certain indirect measures related to academic engagement. These quantitative findings were consistent with qualitative information obtained from focus groups conducted with the students in the academic-themed seminar. The overall picture from across the data sources suggests that students were realizing a greater benefit from the academic-themed first-year seminar.
ISSN:1521-0251
1541-4167
DOI:10.1177/1521025115579673