Loading…
Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes
Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed b...
Saved in:
Published in: | Assessment for effective intervention 2014-12, Vol.40 (1), p.24-39 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13 |
container_end_page | 39 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 24 |
container_title | Assessment for effective intervention |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Kurz, Alexander Elliott, Stephen N. Lemons, Christopher J. Zigmond, Naomi Kloo, Amanda Kettler, Ryan J. |
description | Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed by accountability measures. This initial study was designed to (a) describe the extent to which general and special educators provide their eighth-grade classes with an opportunity to learn the state-specific standards and to (b) examine the extent to which SWDs experience a differentiated opportunity to learn compared with their overall class. Across three states, we trained 38 general and special educators to use an online teacher log to report on various opportunity-to-learn (OTL) indices for 46 mathematics and reading classes and 89 nested SWDs. Based on an average logging period of 151 days, the results indicated that this sample’s SWDs included in general education classes experienced less time on standards, more non-instructional time, and less content coverage than their overall class. Limitations and implications for policy and future research are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1534508414522685 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1534508414522685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1043653</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1534508414522685</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ1043653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKt7N0JeIJrfmWRZaq3KQBdVXA6ZTFJTxsyQZBZ9e6dUXAiu7oHvnnO5B4Bbgu8JKcsHIhgXWHLCBaWFFGdgRhSTqORCnk96wujIL8FVSnuMmRSCz4BbpGRT8mEHN8PQxzwGnw8o96iyOgbo-gi3eWxtyAl--PwJH33Sje989jZBH-DaBht1B3Vo4Xawxk961Y5GZ98HuOz08cA1uHC6S_bmZ87B-9PqbfmMqs36ZbmokGGYZaQdLxSmUhpZMmNsq1RRGFc4QSijWrqmscIp1TjKHVGUSENZK43jJRWtI2wO8CnXxD6laF09RP-l46EmuD72VP_tabLcnSw2evO7vnolmLNCsImjE096Z-t9P8YwffB_3jdlJnKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes</title><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Kurz, Alexander ; Elliott, Stephen N. ; Lemons, Christopher J. ; Zigmond, Naomi ; Kloo, Amanda ; Kettler, Ryan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Alexander ; Elliott, Stephen N. ; Lemons, Christopher J. ; Zigmond, Naomi ; Kloo, Amanda ; Kettler, Ryan J.</creatorcontrib><description>Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed by accountability measures. This initial study was designed to (a) describe the extent to which general and special educators provide their eighth-grade classes with an opportunity to learn the state-specific standards and to (b) examine the extent to which SWDs experience a differentiated opportunity to learn compared with their overall class. Across three states, we trained 38 general and special educators to use an online teacher log to report on various opportunity-to-learn (OTL) indices for 46 mathematics and reading classes and 89 nested SWDs. Based on an average logging period of 151 days, the results indicated that this sample’s SWDs included in general education classes experienced less time on standards, more non-instructional time, and less content coverage than their overall class. Limitations and implications for policy and future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-5084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-7458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1534508414522685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Arizona ; Comparative Analysis ; Course Content ; Disabilities ; Educational Opportunities ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Mathematics Instruction ; Measures (Individuals) ; Middle School Students ; Middle School Teachers ; Pennsylvania ; Reading Instruction ; South Carolina ; Student Characteristics ; Teaching Methods ; Time Factors (Learning)</subject><ispartof>Assessment for effective intervention, 2014-12, Vol.40 (1), p.24-39</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,79134</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1043653$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemons, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigmond, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloo, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettler, Ryan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes</title><title>Assessment for effective intervention</title><description>Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed by accountability measures. This initial study was designed to (a) describe the extent to which general and special educators provide their eighth-grade classes with an opportunity to learn the state-specific standards and to (b) examine the extent to which SWDs experience a differentiated opportunity to learn compared with their overall class. Across three states, we trained 38 general and special educators to use an online teacher log to report on various opportunity-to-learn (OTL) indices for 46 mathematics and reading classes and 89 nested SWDs. Based on an average logging period of 151 days, the results indicated that this sample’s SWDs included in general education classes experienced less time on standards, more non-instructional time, and less content coverage than their overall class. Limitations and implications for policy and future research are discussed.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Educational Opportunities</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>South Carolina</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Time Factors (Learning)</subject><issn>1534-5084</issn><issn>1938-7458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKt7N0JeIJrfmWRZaq3KQBdVXA6ZTFJTxsyQZBZ9e6dUXAiu7oHvnnO5B4Bbgu8JKcsHIhgXWHLCBaWFFGdgRhSTqORCnk96wujIL8FVSnuMmRSCz4BbpGRT8mEHN8PQxzwGnw8o96iyOgbo-gi3eWxtyAl--PwJH33Sje989jZBH-DaBht1B3Vo4Xawxk961Y5GZ98HuOz08cA1uHC6S_bmZ87B-9PqbfmMqs36ZbmokGGYZaQdLxSmUhpZMmNsq1RRGFc4QSijWrqmscIp1TjKHVGUSENZK43jJRWtI2wO8CnXxD6laF09RP-l46EmuD72VP_tabLcnSw2evO7vnolmLNCsImjE096Z-t9P8YwffB_3jdlJnKA</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Kurz, Alexander</creator><creator>Elliott, Stephen N.</creator><creator>Lemons, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Zigmond, Naomi</creator><creator>Kloo, Amanda</creator><creator>Kettler, Ryan J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes</title><author>Kurz, Alexander ; Elliott, Stephen N. ; Lemons, Christopher J. ; Zigmond, Naomi ; Kloo, Amanda ; Kettler, Ryan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Educational Opportunities</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>South Carolina</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Time Factors (Learning)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemons, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigmond, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloo, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettler, Ryan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Assessment for effective intervention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurz, Alexander</au><au>Elliott, Stephen N.</au><au>Lemons, Christopher J.</au><au>Zigmond, Naomi</au><au>Kloo, Amanda</au><au>Kettler, Ryan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1043653</ericid><atitle>Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes</atitle><jtitle>Assessment for effective intervention</jtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>24-39</pages><issn>1534-5084</issn><eissn>1938-7458</eissn><abstract>Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed by accountability measures. This initial study was designed to (a) describe the extent to which general and special educators provide their eighth-grade classes with an opportunity to learn the state-specific standards and to (b) examine the extent to which SWDs experience a differentiated opportunity to learn compared with their overall class. Across three states, we trained 38 general and special educators to use an online teacher log to report on various opportunity-to-learn (OTL) indices for 46 mathematics and reading classes and 89 nested SWDs. Based on an average logging period of 151 days, the results indicated that this sample’s SWDs included in general education classes experienced less time on standards, more non-instructional time, and less content coverage than their overall class. Limitations and implications for policy and future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1534508414522685</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1534-5084 |
ispartof | Assessment for effective intervention, 2014-12, Vol.40 (1), p.24-39 |
issn | 1534-5084 1938-7458 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1534508414522685 |
source | ERIC; SAGE |
subjects | Accountability Arizona Comparative Analysis Course Content Disabilities Educational Opportunities Instructional Effectiveness Mathematics Instruction Measures (Individuals) Middle School Students Middle School Teachers Pennsylvania Reading Instruction South Carolina Student Characteristics Teaching Methods Time Factors (Learning) |
title | Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A28%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Opportunity-to-Learn%20for%20Students%20With%20Disabilities%20in%20General%20and%20Special%20Education%20Classes&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20for%20effective%20intervention&rft.au=Kurz,%20Alexander&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=24-39&rft.issn=1534-5084&rft.eissn=1938-7458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1534508414522685&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1043653%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1043653&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1534508414522685&rfr_iscdi=true |