Loading…

Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes

Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed b...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Assessment for effective intervention 2014-12, Vol.40 (1), p.24-39
Main Authors: Kurz, Alexander, Elliott, Stephen N., Lemons, Christopher J., Zigmond, Naomi, Kloo, Amanda, Kettler, Ryan J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13
container_end_page 39
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title Assessment for effective intervention
container_volume 40
creator Kurz, Alexander
Elliott, Stephen N.
Lemons, Christopher J.
Zigmond, Naomi
Kloo, Amanda
Kettler, Ryan J.
description Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed by accountability measures. This initial study was designed to (a) describe the extent to which general and special educators provide their eighth-grade classes with an opportunity to learn the state-specific standards and to (b) examine the extent to which SWDs experience a differentiated opportunity to learn compared with their overall class. Across three states, we trained 38 general and special educators to use an online teacher log to report on various opportunity-to-learn (OTL) indices for 46 mathematics and reading classes and 89 nested SWDs. Based on an average logging period of 151 days, the results indicated that this sample’s SWDs included in general education classes experienced less time on standards, more non-instructional time, and less content coverage than their overall class. Limitations and implications for policy and future research are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1534508414522685
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1534508414522685</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1043653</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1534508414522685</sage_id><sourcerecordid>EJ1043653</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKt7N0JeIJrfmWRZaq3KQBdVXA6ZTFJTxsyQZBZ9e6dUXAiu7oHvnnO5B4Bbgu8JKcsHIhgXWHLCBaWFFGdgRhSTqORCnk96wujIL8FVSnuMmRSCz4BbpGRT8mEHN8PQxzwGnw8o96iyOgbo-gi3eWxtyAl--PwJH33Sje989jZBH-DaBht1B3Vo4Xawxk961Y5GZ98HuOz08cA1uHC6S_bmZ87B-9PqbfmMqs36ZbmokGGYZaQdLxSmUhpZMmNsq1RRGFc4QSijWrqmscIp1TjKHVGUSENZK43jJRWtI2wO8CnXxD6laF09RP-l46EmuD72VP_tabLcnSw2evO7vnolmLNCsImjE096Z-t9P8YwffB_3jdlJnKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes</title><source>ERIC</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Kurz, Alexander ; Elliott, Stephen N. ; Lemons, Christopher J. ; Zigmond, Naomi ; Kloo, Amanda ; Kettler, Ryan J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Alexander ; Elliott, Stephen N. ; Lemons, Christopher J. ; Zigmond, Naomi ; Kloo, Amanda ; Kettler, Ryan J.</creatorcontrib><description>Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed by accountability measures. This initial study was designed to (a) describe the extent to which general and special educators provide their eighth-grade classes with an opportunity to learn the state-specific standards and to (b) examine the extent to which SWDs experience a differentiated opportunity to learn compared with their overall class. Across three states, we trained 38 general and special educators to use an online teacher log to report on various opportunity-to-learn (OTL) indices for 46 mathematics and reading classes and 89 nested SWDs. Based on an average logging period of 151 days, the results indicated that this sample’s SWDs included in general education classes experienced less time on standards, more non-instructional time, and less content coverage than their overall class. Limitations and implications for policy and future research are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1534-5084</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-7458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1534508414522685</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Arizona ; Comparative Analysis ; Course Content ; Disabilities ; Educational Opportunities ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Mathematics Instruction ; Measures (Individuals) ; Middle School Students ; Middle School Teachers ; Pennsylvania ; Reading Instruction ; South Carolina ; Student Characteristics ; Teaching Methods ; Time Factors (Learning)</subject><ispartof>Assessment for effective intervention, 2014-12, Vol.40 (1), p.24-39</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2014</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923,79134</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1043653$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemons, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigmond, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloo, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettler, Ryan J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes</title><title>Assessment for effective intervention</title><description>Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed by accountability measures. This initial study was designed to (a) describe the extent to which general and special educators provide their eighth-grade classes with an opportunity to learn the state-specific standards and to (b) examine the extent to which SWDs experience a differentiated opportunity to learn compared with their overall class. Across three states, we trained 38 general and special educators to use an online teacher log to report on various opportunity-to-learn (OTL) indices for 46 mathematics and reading classes and 89 nested SWDs. Based on an average logging period of 151 days, the results indicated that this sample’s SWDs included in general education classes experienced less time on standards, more non-instructional time, and less content coverage than their overall class. Limitations and implications for policy and future research are discussed.</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Arizona</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Course Content</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Educational Opportunities</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Middle School Teachers</subject><subject>Pennsylvania</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>South Carolina</subject><subject>Student Characteristics</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Time Factors (Learning)</subject><issn>1534-5084</issn><issn>1938-7458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM1KAzEUhYMoWKt7N0JeIJrfmWRZaq3KQBdVXA6ZTFJTxsyQZBZ9e6dUXAiu7oHvnnO5B4Bbgu8JKcsHIhgXWHLCBaWFFGdgRhSTqORCnk96wujIL8FVSnuMmRSCz4BbpGRT8mEHN8PQxzwGnw8o96iyOgbo-gi3eWxtyAl--PwJH33Sje989jZBH-DaBht1B3Vo4Xawxk961Y5GZ98HuOz08cA1uHC6S_bmZ87B-9PqbfmMqs36ZbmokGGYZaQdLxSmUhpZMmNsq1RRGFc4QSijWrqmscIp1TjKHVGUSENZK43jJRWtI2wO8CnXxD6laF09RP-l46EmuD72VP_tabLcnSw2evO7vnolmLNCsImjE096Z-t9P8YwffB_3jdlJnKA</recordid><startdate>201412</startdate><enddate>201412</enddate><creator>Kurz, Alexander</creator><creator>Elliott, Stephen N.</creator><creator>Lemons, Christopher J.</creator><creator>Zigmond, Naomi</creator><creator>Kloo, Amanda</creator><creator>Kettler, Ryan J.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE Publications and Hammill Institute on Disabilities</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201412</creationdate><title>Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes</title><author>Kurz, Alexander ; Elliott, Stephen N. ; Lemons, Christopher J. ; Zigmond, Naomi ; Kloo, Amanda ; Kettler, Ryan J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Arizona</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Course Content</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Educational Opportunities</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Middle School Teachers</topic><topic>Pennsylvania</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>South Carolina</topic><topic>Student Characteristics</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Time Factors (Learning)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurz, Alexander</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Stephen N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemons, Christopher J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zigmond, Naomi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloo, Amanda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kettler, Ryan J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Assessment for effective intervention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurz, Alexander</au><au>Elliott, Stephen N.</au><au>Lemons, Christopher J.</au><au>Zigmond, Naomi</au><au>Kloo, Amanda</au><au>Kettler, Ryan J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1043653</ericid><atitle>Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes</atitle><jtitle>Assessment for effective intervention</jtitle><date>2014-12</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>39</epage><pages>24-39</pages><issn>1534-5084</issn><eissn>1938-7458</eissn><abstract>Current legislation encourages schools to educate students with disabilities (SWDs) in general education settings to the greatest extent appropriate. However, it is unclear whether inclusion in general education settings provides SWDs a sufficient opportunity to learn the academic content assessed by accountability measures. This initial study was designed to (a) describe the extent to which general and special educators provide their eighth-grade classes with an opportunity to learn the state-specific standards and to (b) examine the extent to which SWDs experience a differentiated opportunity to learn compared with their overall class. Across three states, we trained 38 general and special educators to use an online teacher log to report on various opportunity-to-learn (OTL) indices for 46 mathematics and reading classes and 89 nested SWDs. Based on an average logging period of 151 days, the results indicated that this sample’s SWDs included in general education classes experienced less time on standards, more non-instructional time, and less content coverage than their overall class. Limitations and implications for policy and future research are discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1534508414522685</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1534-5084
ispartof Assessment for effective intervention, 2014-12, Vol.40 (1), p.24-39
issn 1534-5084
1938-7458
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1534508414522685
source ERIC; SAGE
subjects Accountability
Arizona
Comparative Analysis
Course Content
Disabilities
Educational Opportunities
Instructional Effectiveness
Mathematics Instruction
Measures (Individuals)
Middle School Students
Middle School Teachers
Pennsylvania
Reading Instruction
South Carolina
Student Characteristics
Teaching Methods
Time Factors (Learning)
title Assessing Opportunity-to-Learn for Students With Disabilities in General and Special Education Classes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T11%3A28%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Opportunity-to-Learn%20for%20Students%20With%20Disabilities%20in%20General%20and%20Special%20Education%20Classes&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20for%20effective%20intervention&rft.au=Kurz,%20Alexander&rft.date=2014-12&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=39&rft.pages=24-39&rft.issn=1534-5084&rft.eissn=1938-7458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1534508414522685&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1043653%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c303t-af4690288c873cced9966cf6f51232a8fbbe5f99bf24f19218c23d8cf4725df13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1043653&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1534508414522685&rfr_iscdi=true