Loading…

Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison Studies

Bland and Altman's (1986, Lancet 327: 307–310) limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative characteristic. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods differ, limits of agr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Stata journal 2017-03, Vol.17 (1), p.208-221
Main Authors: Taffé, Patrick, Peng, Mingkai, Stagg, Vicki, Williamson, Tyler
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3624df8330a23dd876c3fc1d3694f56ef34feda23d84f4802a19dcd429b733b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3624df8330a23dd876c3fc1d3694f56ef34feda23d84f4802a19dcd429b733b3
container_end_page 221
container_issue 1
container_start_page 208
container_title The Stata journal
container_volume 17
creator Taffé, Patrick
Peng, Mingkai
Stagg, Vicki
Williamson, Tyler
description Bland and Altman's (1986, Lancet 327: 307–310) limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative characteristic. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods differ, limits of agreement can be misleading. biasplot implements a new statistical methodology that Taffé (Forthcoming, Statistical Methods in Medical Research) recently developed to circumvent this issue and assess bias and precision of the two measurement methods (one is the reference standard, and the other is the new measurement method to be evaluated). biasplot produces three new plots introduced by Taffé: the “bias plot”, “precision plot”, and “comparison plot”. These help the investigator visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method. In this article, we introduce the user-written command biasplot and present worked examples using simulated data included with the package. Note that the Taffé method assumes there are several measurements from the reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1536867X1701700111
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1536867X1701700111</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1536867X1701700111</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1536867X1701700111</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3624df8330a23dd876c3fc1d3694f56ef34feda23d84f4802a19dcd429b733b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kNtKAzEQhoMoWKsv4FVeYG2SSTdb72qpB6i4YC-8W9McNLXdlMxW8O3NUr0ShIEZ_n--YWYIueTsinOlRnwMZVWqF65YDsY5PyKDXiwqBfL4t84dp-QMcc2YVFyIAXm9CRp3m9hd0ymttfnQb452kc69d6YLn47W2cRemiI6RNoDVLeW1smZgCG2NLT00XXv0dJZ3O50CpjF525vg8NzcuL1Bt3FTx6S5e18ObsvFk93D7PpojAAvCugFNL6CoBpAdZWqjTgDbdQTqQfl86D9M72XiW9rJjQfGKNlWKyUgArGBJxGGtSREzON7sUtjp9NZw1_Yuavy_K0OgAYb66Wcd9avOK_xHfIB1m3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison Studies</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Taffé, Patrick ; Peng, Mingkai ; Stagg, Vicki ; Williamson, Tyler</creator><creatorcontrib>Taffé, Patrick ; Peng, Mingkai ; Stagg, Vicki ; Williamson, Tyler</creatorcontrib><description>Bland and Altman's (1986, Lancet 327: 307–310) limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative characteristic. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods differ, limits of agreement can be misleading. biasplot implements a new statistical methodology that Taffé (Forthcoming, Statistical Methods in Medical Research) recently developed to circumvent this issue and assess bias and precision of the two measurement methods (one is the reference standard, and the other is the new measurement method to be evaluated). biasplot produces three new plots introduced by Taffé: the “bias plot”, “precision plot”, and “comparison plot”. These help the investigator visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method. In this article, we introduce the user-written command biasplot and present worked examples using simulated data included with the package. Note that the Taffé method assumes there are several measurements from the reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1536-867X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1536-8734</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1536867X1701700111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>The Stata journal, 2017-03, Vol.17 (1), p.208-221</ispartof><rights>2017 StataCorp LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3624df8330a23dd876c3fc1d3694f56ef34feda23d84f4802a19dcd429b733b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3624df8330a23dd876c3fc1d3694f56ef34feda23d84f4802a19dcd429b733b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taffé, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Mingkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Tyler</creatorcontrib><title>Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison Studies</title><title>The Stata journal</title><description>Bland and Altman's (1986, Lancet 327: 307–310) limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative characteristic. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods differ, limits of agreement can be misleading. biasplot implements a new statistical methodology that Taffé (Forthcoming, Statistical Methods in Medical Research) recently developed to circumvent this issue and assess bias and precision of the two measurement methods (one is the reference standard, and the other is the new measurement method to be evaluated). biasplot produces three new plots introduced by Taffé: the “bias plot”, “precision plot”, and “comparison plot”. These help the investigator visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method. In this article, we introduce the user-written command biasplot and present worked examples using simulated data included with the package. Note that the Taffé method assumes there are several measurements from the reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.</description><issn>1536-867X</issn><issn>1536-8734</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kNtKAzEQhoMoWKsv4FVeYG2SSTdb72qpB6i4YC-8W9McNLXdlMxW8O3NUr0ShIEZ_n--YWYIueTsinOlRnwMZVWqF65YDsY5PyKDXiwqBfL4t84dp-QMcc2YVFyIAXm9CRp3m9hd0ymttfnQb452kc69d6YLn47W2cRemiI6RNoDVLeW1smZgCG2NLT00XXv0dJZ3O50CpjF525vg8NzcuL1Bt3FTx6S5e18ObsvFk93D7PpojAAvCugFNL6CoBpAdZWqjTgDbdQTqQfl86D9M72XiW9rJjQfGKNlWKyUgArGBJxGGtSREzON7sUtjp9NZw1_Yuavy_K0OgAYb66Wcd9avOK_xHfIB1m3w</recordid><startdate>20170301</startdate><enddate>20170301</enddate><creator>Taffé, Patrick</creator><creator>Peng, Mingkai</creator><creator>Stagg, Vicki</creator><creator>Williamson, Tyler</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170301</creationdate><title>Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison Studies</title><author>Taffé, Patrick ; Peng, Mingkai ; Stagg, Vicki ; Williamson, Tyler</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3624df8330a23dd876c3fc1d3694f56ef34feda23d84f4802a19dcd429b733b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taffé, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Mingkai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stagg, Vicki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williamson, Tyler</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>The Stata journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taffé, Patrick</au><au>Peng, Mingkai</au><au>Stagg, Vicki</au><au>Williamson, Tyler</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison Studies</atitle><jtitle>The Stata journal</jtitle><date>2017-03-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>208</spage><epage>221</epage><pages>208-221</pages><issn>1536-867X</issn><eissn>1536-8734</eissn><abstract>Bland and Altman's (1986, Lancet 327: 307–310) limits of agreement have been used in many clinical research settings to assess agreement between two methods of measuring a quantitative characteristic. However, when the variances of the measurement errors of the two methods differ, limits of agreement can be misleading. biasplot implements a new statistical methodology that Taffé (Forthcoming, Statistical Methods in Medical Research) recently developed to circumvent this issue and assess bias and precision of the two measurement methods (one is the reference standard, and the other is the new measurement method to be evaluated). biasplot produces three new plots introduced by Taffé: the “bias plot”, “precision plot”, and “comparison plot”. These help the investigator visually evaluate the performance of the new measurement method. In this article, we introduce the user-written command biasplot and present worked examples using simulated data included with the package. Note that the Taffé method assumes there are several measurements from the reference standard and possibly as few as one measurement from the new method for each individual.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1536867X1701700111</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1536-867X
ispartof The Stata journal, 2017-03, Vol.17 (1), p.208-221
issn 1536-867X
1536-8734
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1536867X1701700111
source SAGE
title Biasplot: A Package to Effective Plots to Assess Bias and Precision in Method Comparison Studies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T14%3A12%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Biasplot:%20A%20Package%20to%20Effective%20Plots%20to%20Assess%20Bias%20and%20Precision%20in%20Method%20Comparison%20Studies&rft.jtitle=The%20Stata%20journal&rft.au=Taff%C3%A9,%20Patrick&rft.date=2017-03-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=208&rft.epage=221&rft.pages=208-221&rft.issn=1536-867X&rft.eissn=1536-8734&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1536867X1701700111&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1536867X1701700111%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-3624df8330a23dd876c3fc1d3694f56ef34feda23d84f4802a19dcd429b733b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1536867X1701700111&rfr_iscdi=true