Loading…

Warnings and Pedestrian Behavior: A Case Study of Unintended Effects

We examine a case in which contradictory behaviors to a single safety stimulus occur even though the information content of the warning appears to have been correctly understood. Observations of pedestrian behavior at a grade crossing with active signals are reported. Some pedestrians often ignored...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2006-10, Vol.50 (19), p.2202-2206
Main Author: Huntley-Fenner, Gavin
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-97369985708ada5c9f4f2a470ab6d6b41747d34344a2cd969e55fb52777814653
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-97369985708ada5c9f4f2a470ab6d6b41747d34344a2cd969e55fb52777814653
container_end_page 2206
container_issue 19
container_start_page 2202
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
container_volume 50
creator Huntley-Fenner, Gavin
description We examine a case in which contradictory behaviors to a single safety stimulus occur even though the information content of the warning appears to have been correctly understood. Observations of pedestrian behavior at a grade crossing with active signals are reported. Some pedestrians often ignored warnings to stay out of the grade crossing while trains were entering or leaving the station. These data are consistent with proposals that hazard communications are among the multiple pieces of information that users may draw on in order to complete a desired objective. It is argued that pedestrian violations have different causes than motor vehicle violation, but personal goals and convenience play an important role in compliance with crossing signals. Frameworks for incorporating goal-oriented behavior into theories of warnings effectiveness, such as “affordances” are briefly discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/154193120605001903
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193120605001903</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_154193120605001903</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_154193120605001903</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-97369985708ada5c9f4f2a470ab6d6b41747d34344a2cd969e55fb52777814653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AYhQdRMFZfwNW8QOw_94y7GusFCgpaXIY_mZmaoonMpELf3oS6E1ydzfcdDoeQSwZXjBkzZ0oyKxgHDQqAWRBHJONM21yBNsckm4B8Ik7JWUpbAC6MkBm5fcPYtd0mUewcffbOpyG22NEb_47fbR-v6YKWmDx9GXZuT_tA1yM_-M55R5ch-GZI5-Qk4EfyF785I-u75Wv5kK-e7h_LxSpvOPAht0ZoawtloECHqrFBBo7SANba6VoyI40TUkiJvHFWW69UqBU3xhRMaiVmhB96m9inFH2ovmL7iXFfMaimH6q_P4zS_CAl3Phq2-9iN278z_gB0bFbOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Warnings and Pedestrian Behavior: A Case Study of Unintended Effects</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Huntley-Fenner, Gavin</creator><creatorcontrib>Huntley-Fenner, Gavin</creatorcontrib><description>We examine a case in which contradictory behaviors to a single safety stimulus occur even though the information content of the warning appears to have been correctly understood. Observations of pedestrian behavior at a grade crossing with active signals are reported. Some pedestrians often ignored warnings to stay out of the grade crossing while trains were entering or leaving the station. These data are consistent with proposals that hazard communications are among the multiple pieces of information that users may draw on in order to complete a desired objective. It is argued that pedestrian violations have different causes than motor vehicle violation, but personal goals and convenience play an important role in compliance with crossing signals. Frameworks for incorporating goal-oriented behavior into theories of warnings effectiveness, such as “affordances” are briefly discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/154193120605001903</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2006-10, Vol.50 (19), p.2202-2206</ispartof><rights>2006 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-97369985708ada5c9f4f2a470ab6d6b41747d34344a2cd969e55fb52777814653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-97369985708ada5c9f4f2a470ab6d6b41747d34344a2cd969e55fb52777814653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huntley-Fenner, Gavin</creatorcontrib><title>Warnings and Pedestrian Behavior: A Case Study of Unintended Effects</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>We examine a case in which contradictory behaviors to a single safety stimulus occur even though the information content of the warning appears to have been correctly understood. Observations of pedestrian behavior at a grade crossing with active signals are reported. Some pedestrians often ignored warnings to stay out of the grade crossing while trains were entering or leaving the station. These data are consistent with proposals that hazard communications are among the multiple pieces of information that users may draw on in order to complete a desired objective. It is argued that pedestrian violations have different causes than motor vehicle violation, but personal goals and convenience play an important role in compliance with crossing signals. Frameworks for incorporating goal-oriented behavior into theories of warnings effectiveness, such as “affordances” are briefly discussed.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AYhQdRMFZfwNW8QOw_94y7GusFCgpaXIY_mZmaoonMpELf3oS6E1ydzfcdDoeQSwZXjBkzZ0oyKxgHDQqAWRBHJONM21yBNsckm4B8Ik7JWUpbAC6MkBm5fcPYtd0mUewcffbOpyG22NEb_47fbR-v6YKWmDx9GXZuT_tA1yM_-M55R5ch-GZI5-Qk4EfyF785I-u75Wv5kK-e7h_LxSpvOPAht0ZoawtloECHqrFBBo7SANba6VoyI40TUkiJvHFWW69UqBU3xhRMaiVmhB96m9inFH2ovmL7iXFfMaimH6q_P4zS_CAl3Phq2-9iN278z_gB0bFbOw</recordid><startdate>200610</startdate><enddate>200610</enddate><creator>Huntley-Fenner, Gavin</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200610</creationdate><title>Warnings and Pedestrian Behavior: A Case Study of Unintended Effects</title><author>Huntley-Fenner, Gavin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-97369985708ada5c9f4f2a470ab6d6b41747d34344a2cd969e55fb52777814653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huntley-Fenner, Gavin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huntley-Fenner, Gavin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Warnings and Pedestrian Behavior: A Case Study of Unintended Effects</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2006-10</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>19</issue><spage>2202</spage><epage>2206</epage><pages>2202-2206</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>We examine a case in which contradictory behaviors to a single safety stimulus occur even though the information content of the warning appears to have been correctly understood. Observations of pedestrian behavior at a grade crossing with active signals are reported. Some pedestrians often ignored warnings to stay out of the grade crossing while trains were entering or leaving the station. These data are consistent with proposals that hazard communications are among the multiple pieces of information that users may draw on in order to complete a desired objective. It is argued that pedestrian violations have different causes than motor vehicle violation, but personal goals and convenience play an important role in compliance with crossing signals. Frameworks for incorporating goal-oriented behavior into theories of warnings effectiveness, such as “affordances” are briefly discussed.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/154193120605001903</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-9312
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2006-10, Vol.50 (19), p.2202-2206
issn 1541-9312
1071-1813
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_154193120605001903
source Sage Journals Online
title Warnings and Pedestrian Behavior: A Case Study of Unintended Effects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A25%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Warnings%20and%20Pedestrian%20Behavior:%20A%20Case%20Study%20of%20Unintended%20Effects&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Huntley-Fenner,%20Gavin&rft.date=2006-10&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=19&rft.spage=2202&rft.epage=2206&rft.pages=2202-2206&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/154193120605001903&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_154193120605001903%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c202t-97369985708ada5c9f4f2a470ab6d6b41747d34344a2cd969e55fb52777814653%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_154193120605001903&rfr_iscdi=true