Loading…

The Effect of Interface Type on Visual Error Checking Behavior

During data entry tasks, small errors can result in catastrophe, for instance adding an extra zero to a drug dose when programming an infusion in a hospital. For this reason understanding users’ error checking behavior is highly important. One aspect that can affect error checking is the interface t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting 2015-09, Vol.59 (1), p.436-439
Main Authors: Wiseman, Sarah, Borghouts, Judith, Grgic, Dora, Brumby, Duncan P., Cox, Anna L.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2342-386d7713f5a603cbda7fb34ed4a98d4e8ebf88e411141ade86155f62d595c1fc3
container_end_page 439
container_issue 1
container_start_page 436
container_title Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
container_volume 59
creator Wiseman, Sarah
Borghouts, Judith
Grgic, Dora
Brumby, Duncan P.
Cox, Anna L.
description During data entry tasks, small errors can result in catastrophe, for instance adding an extra zero to a drug dose when programming an infusion in a hospital. For this reason understanding users’ error checking behavior is highly important. One aspect that can affect error checking is the interface that a user must interact with to enter data. Often user interaction with interfaces is evaluated based on speed or error rate. In this paper, in addition to this, we also explore how different types of interface can affect a user’s error checking behavior in a multitasking environment. We show that a fast to use and familiar interface discourages users from carrying out thorough visual checking in a number transcription task. We also found that having participants perform an additional secondary task while doing the number entry task made participants less likely to check the inputted numbers for errors.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1541931215591092
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1541931215591092</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1541931215591092</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1541931215591092</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2342-386d7713f5a603cbda7fb34ed4a98d4e8ebf88e411141ade86155f62d595c1fc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1j81LwzAYxoMoWKd3j_kHqnnz0aQXQUvVwcBL9VrS9M3aOduRbML-e1vmSfD0HJ4Pnh8ht8DuALS-ByUhF8BBqRxYzs9IwiHLU8UyfU6S2U5n_5JcxbhhjAstZEIeqg5p6T26PR09XQ57DN46pNVxh3Qc6EcfD3ZLyxDGQIsO3Wc_rOkTdva7H8M1ufB2G_HmVxfk_bmsitd09fayLB5XqeNC8lSYrNUahFc2Y8I1rdW-ERJbaXPTSjTYeGNQAoAE26LJJgyf8VblyoF3YkHYadeFMcaAvt6F_suGYw2snvnrv_xTJT1Vol1jvRkPYZge_p__Ab5MWQE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Effect of Interface Type on Visual Error Checking Behavior</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Wiseman, Sarah ; Borghouts, Judith ; Grgic, Dora ; Brumby, Duncan P. ; Cox, Anna L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Sarah ; Borghouts, Judith ; Grgic, Dora ; Brumby, Duncan P. ; Cox, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><description>During data entry tasks, small errors can result in catastrophe, for instance adding an extra zero to a drug dose when programming an infusion in a hospital. For this reason understanding users’ error checking behavior is highly important. One aspect that can affect error checking is the interface that a user must interact with to enter data. Often user interaction with interfaces is evaluated based on speed or error rate. In this paper, in addition to this, we also explore how different types of interface can affect a user’s error checking behavior in a multitasking environment. We show that a fast to use and familiar interface discourages users from carrying out thorough visual checking in a number transcription task. We also found that having participants perform an additional secondary task while doing the number entry task made participants less likely to check the inputted numbers for errors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1541-9312</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1071-1813</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-5067</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1541931215591092</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2015-09, Vol.59 (1), p.436-439</ispartof><rights>2015 Human Factors and Ergonomics Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2342-386d7713f5a603cbda7fb34ed4a98d4e8ebf88e411141ade86155f62d595c1fc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,79110</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borghouts, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumby, Duncan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><title>The Effect of Interface Type on Visual Error Checking Behavior</title><title>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</title><description>During data entry tasks, small errors can result in catastrophe, for instance adding an extra zero to a drug dose when programming an infusion in a hospital. For this reason understanding users’ error checking behavior is highly important. One aspect that can affect error checking is the interface that a user must interact with to enter data. Often user interaction with interfaces is evaluated based on speed or error rate. In this paper, in addition to this, we also explore how different types of interface can affect a user’s error checking behavior in a multitasking environment. We show that a fast to use and familiar interface discourages users from carrying out thorough visual checking in a number transcription task. We also found that having participants perform an additional secondary task while doing the number entry task made participants less likely to check the inputted numbers for errors.</description><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><issn>2169-5067</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1j81LwzAYxoMoWKd3j_kHqnnz0aQXQUvVwcBL9VrS9M3aOduRbML-e1vmSfD0HJ4Pnh8ht8DuALS-ByUhF8BBqRxYzs9IwiHLU8UyfU6S2U5n_5JcxbhhjAstZEIeqg5p6T26PR09XQ57DN46pNVxh3Qc6EcfD3ZLyxDGQIsO3Wc_rOkTdva7H8M1ufB2G_HmVxfk_bmsitd09fayLB5XqeNC8lSYrNUahFc2Y8I1rdW-ERJbaXPTSjTYeGNQAoAE26LJJgyf8VblyoF3YkHYadeFMcaAvt6F_suGYw2snvnrv_xTJT1Vol1jvRkPYZge_p__Ab5MWQE</recordid><startdate>201509</startdate><enddate>201509</enddate><creator>Wiseman, Sarah</creator><creator>Borghouts, Judith</creator><creator>Grgic, Dora</creator><creator>Brumby, Duncan P.</creator><creator>Cox, Anna L.</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201509</creationdate><title>The Effect of Interface Type on Visual Error Checking Behavior</title><author>Wiseman, Sarah ; Borghouts, Judith ; Grgic, Dora ; Brumby, Duncan P. ; Cox, Anna L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2342-386d7713f5a603cbda7fb34ed4a98d4e8ebf88e411141ade86155f62d595c1fc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiseman, Sarah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borghouts, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grgic, Dora</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brumby, Duncan P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cox, Anna L.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiseman, Sarah</au><au>Borghouts, Judith</au><au>Grgic, Dora</au><au>Brumby, Duncan P.</au><au>Cox, Anna L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Effect of Interface Type on Visual Error Checking Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting</jtitle><date>2015-09</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>59</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>436</spage><epage>439</epage><pages>436-439</pages><issn>1541-9312</issn><issn>1071-1813</issn><eissn>2169-5067</eissn><abstract>During data entry tasks, small errors can result in catastrophe, for instance adding an extra zero to a drug dose when programming an infusion in a hospital. For this reason understanding users’ error checking behavior is highly important. One aspect that can affect error checking is the interface that a user must interact with to enter data. Often user interaction with interfaces is evaluated based on speed or error rate. In this paper, in addition to this, we also explore how different types of interface can affect a user’s error checking behavior in a multitasking environment. We show that a fast to use and familiar interface discourages users from carrying out thorough visual checking in a number transcription task. We also found that having participants perform an additional secondary task while doing the number entry task made participants less likely to check the inputted numbers for errors.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1541931215591092</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1541-9312
ispartof Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2015-09, Vol.59 (1), p.436-439
issn 1541-9312
1071-1813
2169-5067
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1541931215591092
source SAGE
title The Effect of Interface Type on Visual Error Checking Behavior
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T17%3A23%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Effect%20of%20Interface%20Type%20on%20Visual%20Error%20Checking%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Human%20Factors%20and%20Ergonomics%20Society%20Annual%20Meeting&rft.au=Wiseman,%20Sarah&rft.date=2015-09&rft.volume=59&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=436&rft.epage=439&rft.pages=436-439&rft.issn=1541-9312&rft.eissn=2169-5067&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1541931215591092&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1541931215591092%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2342-386d7713f5a603cbda7fb34ed4a98d4e8ebf88e411141ade86155f62d595c1fc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1541931215591092&rfr_iscdi=true