Loading…

Literary accountability and the future of human rights protection

Human rights are increasingly described as in crisis. One reason for this is that existing legal accountability mechanisms cannot adequately deal with intricate and multilayered human rights violations that occur in vastly complex social contexts. Thus, if human rights are to continue to offer a wid...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Law, culture and the humanities culture and the humanities, 2023-07
Main Author: Destrooper, Tine
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Law, culture and the humanities
container_volume
creator Destrooper, Tine
description Human rights are increasingly described as in crisis. One reason for this is that existing legal accountability mechanisms cannot adequately deal with intricate and multilayered human rights violations that occur in vastly complex social contexts. Thus, if human rights are to continue to offer a widely accepted framework for thinking about (social) justice, we urgently need to revisit the very notion of human rights accountability in ways that allow for better protection as well as for a more ambitious normative project. This requires re-focusing the debate about human rights accountability on questions of human rights normativity. This article explores which roles literature can play in this regard. It proposes the notion of literary accountability as a conceptual device to (a) recenter the debate around the normative objectives of human rights accountability, (b) offer modalities for ensuring some form of responsibility attribution, notably where other accountability venues are closed or deemed insufficient, and (c) operate within the paradigm of legal accountability to push the boundaries of this paradigm. What each of these three manifestations of literary accountability have in common is that they foreground the need for a more forward-looking and multi-dimensional approach to accountability that seeks to reconnect the normative reality of human rights on one hand, with their imbrication in the concrete worlds of law, politics, and practicalities on the other.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17438721231174791
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17438721231174791</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17438721231174791</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_17438721231174791</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-ac8514de71e335bb57c01e601c6bb80d3f02d223da813b04d2ce515e2ddbd9d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNA_SmF3CqlSzLPobQPzD0krvRzzpWSawgyYe-fW2SW6Gn3Rn2W4Yh5BnYFkCpF1ClqBUHLmZZqgbuyGrxikZJfn_bl4NHsknJG8aZkqXibEV2rc8Ydfyh2towjVkbf_J5lqOjeUDaT3mKSENPh-msRxr9cciJXmLIaLMP4xN56PUp4eY21-Tw9nrYfxTt1_vnftcWlosqF9rWEkqHClAIaYxUlgFWDGxlTM2c6Bl3nAunaxCGlY5blCCRO2dc48SawPWtjSGliH13if48B--AdUsL3Z8WZmZ7ZZI-YvcdpjjOCf8BfgFxXl1R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Literary accountability and the future of human rights protection</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Destrooper, Tine</creator><creatorcontrib>Destrooper, Tine</creatorcontrib><description>Human rights are increasingly described as in crisis. One reason for this is that existing legal accountability mechanisms cannot adequately deal with intricate and multilayered human rights violations that occur in vastly complex social contexts. Thus, if human rights are to continue to offer a widely accepted framework for thinking about (social) justice, we urgently need to revisit the very notion of human rights accountability in ways that allow for better protection as well as for a more ambitious normative project. This requires re-focusing the debate about human rights accountability on questions of human rights normativity. This article explores which roles literature can play in this regard. It proposes the notion of literary accountability as a conceptual device to (a) recenter the debate around the normative objectives of human rights accountability, (b) offer modalities for ensuring some form of responsibility attribution, notably where other accountability venues are closed or deemed insufficient, and (c) operate within the paradigm of legal accountability to push the boundaries of this paradigm. What each of these three manifestations of literary accountability have in common is that they foreground the need for a more forward-looking and multi-dimensional approach to accountability that seeks to reconnect the normative reality of human rights on one hand, with their imbrication in the concrete worlds of law, politics, and practicalities on the other.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-8721</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17438721231174791</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Law, culture and the humanities, 2023-07</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0781-2971</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Destrooper, Tine</creatorcontrib><title>Literary accountability and the future of human rights protection</title><title>Law, culture and the humanities</title><description>Human rights are increasingly described as in crisis. One reason for this is that existing legal accountability mechanisms cannot adequately deal with intricate and multilayered human rights violations that occur in vastly complex social contexts. Thus, if human rights are to continue to offer a widely accepted framework for thinking about (social) justice, we urgently need to revisit the very notion of human rights accountability in ways that allow for better protection as well as for a more ambitious normative project. This requires re-focusing the debate about human rights accountability on questions of human rights normativity. This article explores which roles literature can play in this regard. It proposes the notion of literary accountability as a conceptual device to (a) recenter the debate around the normative objectives of human rights accountability, (b) offer modalities for ensuring some form of responsibility attribution, notably where other accountability venues are closed or deemed insufficient, and (c) operate within the paradigm of legal accountability to push the boundaries of this paradigm. What each of these three manifestations of literary accountability have in common is that they foreground the need for a more forward-looking and multi-dimensional approach to accountability that seeks to reconnect the normative reality of human rights on one hand, with their imbrication in the concrete worlds of law, politics, and practicalities on the other.</description><issn>1743-8721</issn><issn>1743-9752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpoSHNA_SmF3CqlSzLPobQPzD0krvRzzpWSawgyYe-fW2SW6Gn3Rn2W4Yh5BnYFkCpF1ClqBUHLmZZqgbuyGrxikZJfn_bl4NHsknJG8aZkqXibEV2rc8Ydfyh2towjVkbf_J5lqOjeUDaT3mKSENPh-msRxr9cciJXmLIaLMP4xN56PUp4eY21-Tw9nrYfxTt1_vnftcWlosqF9rWEkqHClAIaYxUlgFWDGxlTM2c6Bl3nAunaxCGlY5blCCRO2dc48SawPWtjSGliH13if48B--AdUsL3Z8WZmZ7ZZI-YvcdpjjOCf8BfgFxXl1R</recordid><startdate>20230719</startdate><enddate>20230719</enddate><creator>Destrooper, Tine</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0781-2971</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230719</creationdate><title>Literary accountability and the future of human rights protection</title><author>Destrooper, Tine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-ac8514de71e335bb57c01e601c6bb80d3f02d223da813b04d2ce515e2ddbd9d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Destrooper, Tine</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Law, culture and the humanities</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Destrooper, Tine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Literary accountability and the future of human rights protection</atitle><jtitle>Law, culture and the humanities</jtitle><date>2023-07-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><issn>1743-8721</issn><eissn>1743-9752</eissn><abstract>Human rights are increasingly described as in crisis. One reason for this is that existing legal accountability mechanisms cannot adequately deal with intricate and multilayered human rights violations that occur in vastly complex social contexts. Thus, if human rights are to continue to offer a widely accepted framework for thinking about (social) justice, we urgently need to revisit the very notion of human rights accountability in ways that allow for better protection as well as for a more ambitious normative project. This requires re-focusing the debate about human rights accountability on questions of human rights normativity. This article explores which roles literature can play in this regard. It proposes the notion of literary accountability as a conceptual device to (a) recenter the debate around the normative objectives of human rights accountability, (b) offer modalities for ensuring some form of responsibility attribution, notably where other accountability venues are closed or deemed insufficient, and (c) operate within the paradigm of legal accountability to push the boundaries of this paradigm. What each of these three manifestations of literary accountability have in common is that they foreground the need for a more forward-looking and multi-dimensional approach to accountability that seeks to reconnect the normative reality of human rights on one hand, with their imbrication in the concrete worlds of law, politics, and practicalities on the other.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/17438721231174791</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0781-2971</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-8721
ispartof Law, culture and the humanities, 2023-07
issn 1743-8721
1743-9752
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17438721231174791
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)
title Literary accountability and the future of human rights protection
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T14%3A56%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Literary%20accountability%20and%20the%20future%20of%20human%20rights%20protection&rft.jtitle=Law,%20culture%20and%20the%20humanities&rft.au=Destrooper,%20Tine&rft.date=2023-07-19&rft.issn=1743-8721&rft.eissn=1743-9752&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17438721231174791&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_17438721231174791%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c236t-ac8514de71e335bb57c01e601c6bb80d3f02d223da813b04d2ce515e2ddbd9d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17438721231174791&rfr_iscdi=true