Athlete and coach agreement: Identifying successful performance

Traditional coaching views the coach as an informed resource and the athlete as a reflection of expert knowledge. Recent approaches have criticised a strictly coach driven model of expertise, and in doing so have acknowledged the unique and developing knowledge of athletes, which emerges from extend...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of sports science & coaching 2017-12, Vol.12 (6), p.807-813
Main Authors: Millar, Sarah-Kate, Oldham, Anthony RH, Renshaw, Ian, Hopkins, Will G
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3608e8057f937e026722783a0d386768736468753015ff8b3b74594178e323b43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3608e8057f937e026722783a0d386768736468753015ff8b3b74594178e323b43
container_end_page 813
container_issue 6
container_start_page 807
container_title International journal of sports science & coaching
container_volume 12
creator Millar, Sarah-Kate
Oldham, Anthony RH
Renshaw, Ian
Hopkins, Will G
description Traditional coaching views the coach as an informed resource and the athlete as a reflection of expert knowledge. Recent approaches have criticised a strictly coach driven model of expertise, and in doing so have acknowledged the unique and developing knowledge of athletes, which emerges from extended practice. The growth of the athlete’s contribution in the coach–athlete dyad invites interesting questions about the usefulness of athlete knowledge and the changing role of the coach. Athlete–coach agreement was assessed via a triangulation of quantitative boat speed data from a single sculler and matched to phases of successful rowing that rowers and coaches both agreed on. Coach and rower were able to identify when the boat was travelling its fastest or slowest. However, when the performance was marginally faster or slower, they disagreed, and generally the rowers were more accurate about the performance than their coach. Implications for contemporary coaching practices are considered.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1747954117738886
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1747954117738886</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1747954117738886</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1747954117738886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3608e8057f937e026722783a0d386768736468753015ff8b3b74594178e323b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMtqwzAQFKWFmjT3Hv0DbiWt7JV7KSH0EQj00kJvRpZXjoMfQbIP-fvapKdC97AzMDvLzjJ2L_iDEIiPAhXmqVo4aK2zKxZJrnQCOX5fs2iRk0W_ZesQjnwukIiYR-x5Mx5aGik2fRXbwdhDbGpP1FE_PsW7aobGnZu-jsNkLYXgpjY-kXeD70xv6Y7dONMGWv_iin29vnxu35P9x9tuu9knVmoxJpBxTZqn6HJA4jJDKVGD4RXoDDONkKm5p8BF6pwuoUSV5kqgJpBQKlgxftlr_RCCJ1ecfNMZfy4EL5bcxd8fzJbkYgmmpuI4TL6fL_x__gdWgFlu</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Athlete and coach agreement: Identifying successful performance</title><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Millar, Sarah-Kate ; Oldham, Anthony RH ; Renshaw, Ian ; Hopkins, Will G</creator><creatorcontrib>Millar, Sarah-Kate ; Oldham, Anthony RH ; Renshaw, Ian ; Hopkins, Will G</creatorcontrib><description>Traditional coaching views the coach as an informed resource and the athlete as a reflection of expert knowledge. Recent approaches have criticised a strictly coach driven model of expertise, and in doing so have acknowledged the unique and developing knowledge of athletes, which emerges from extended practice. The growth of the athlete’s contribution in the coach–athlete dyad invites interesting questions about the usefulness of athlete knowledge and the changing role of the coach. Athlete–coach agreement was assessed via a triangulation of quantitative boat speed data from a single sculler and matched to phases of successful rowing that rowers and coaches both agreed on. Coach and rower were able to identify when the boat was travelling its fastest or slowest. However, when the performance was marginally faster or slower, they disagreed, and generally the rowers were more accurate about the performance than their coach. Implications for contemporary coaching practices are considered.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1747-9541</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2048-397X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1747954117738886</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>International journal of sports science &amp; coaching, 2017-12, Vol.12 (6), p.807-813</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3608e8057f937e026722783a0d386768736468753015ff8b3b74594178e323b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3608e8057f937e026722783a0d386768736468753015ff8b3b74594178e323b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Millar, Sarah-Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Anthony RH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renshaw, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Will G</creatorcontrib><title>Athlete and coach agreement: Identifying successful performance</title><title>International journal of sports science &amp; coaching</title><description>Traditional coaching views the coach as an informed resource and the athlete as a reflection of expert knowledge. Recent approaches have criticised a strictly coach driven model of expertise, and in doing so have acknowledged the unique and developing knowledge of athletes, which emerges from extended practice. The growth of the athlete’s contribution in the coach–athlete dyad invites interesting questions about the usefulness of athlete knowledge and the changing role of the coach. Athlete–coach agreement was assessed via a triangulation of quantitative boat speed data from a single sculler and matched to phases of successful rowing that rowers and coaches both agreed on. Coach and rower were able to identify when the boat was travelling its fastest or slowest. However, when the performance was marginally faster or slower, they disagreed, and generally the rowers were more accurate about the performance than their coach. Implications for contemporary coaching practices are considered.</description><issn>1747-9541</issn><issn>2048-397X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMtqwzAQFKWFmjT3Hv0DbiWt7JV7KSH0EQj00kJvRpZXjoMfQbIP-fvapKdC97AzMDvLzjJ2L_iDEIiPAhXmqVo4aK2zKxZJrnQCOX5fs2iRk0W_ZesQjnwukIiYR-x5Mx5aGik2fRXbwdhDbGpP1FE_PsW7aobGnZu-jsNkLYXgpjY-kXeD70xv6Y7dONMGWv_iin29vnxu35P9x9tuu9knVmoxJpBxTZqn6HJA4jJDKVGD4RXoDDONkKm5p8BF6pwuoUSV5kqgJpBQKlgxftlr_RCCJ1ecfNMZfy4EL5bcxd8fzJbkYgmmpuI4TL6fL_x__gdWgFlu</recordid><startdate>201712</startdate><enddate>201712</enddate><creator>Millar, Sarah-Kate</creator><creator>Oldham, Anthony RH</creator><creator>Renshaw, Ian</creator><creator>Hopkins, Will G</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201712</creationdate><title>Athlete and coach agreement: Identifying successful performance</title><author>Millar, Sarah-Kate ; Oldham, Anthony RH ; Renshaw, Ian ; Hopkins, Will G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3608e8057f937e026722783a0d386768736468753015ff8b3b74594178e323b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Millar, Sarah-Kate</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oldham, Anthony RH</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Renshaw, Ian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hopkins, Will G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>International journal of sports science &amp; coaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Millar, Sarah-Kate</au><au>Oldham, Anthony RH</au><au>Renshaw, Ian</au><au>Hopkins, Will G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Athlete and coach agreement: Identifying successful performance</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sports science &amp; coaching</jtitle><date>2017-12</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>807</spage><epage>813</epage><pages>807-813</pages><issn>1747-9541</issn><eissn>2048-397X</eissn><abstract>Traditional coaching views the coach as an informed resource and the athlete as a reflection of expert knowledge. Recent approaches have criticised a strictly coach driven model of expertise, and in doing so have acknowledged the unique and developing knowledge of athletes, which emerges from extended practice. The growth of the athlete’s contribution in the coach–athlete dyad invites interesting questions about the usefulness of athlete knowledge and the changing role of the coach. Athlete–coach agreement was assessed via a triangulation of quantitative boat speed data from a single sculler and matched to phases of successful rowing that rowers and coaches both agreed on. Coach and rower were able to identify when the boat was travelling its fastest or slowest. However, when the performance was marginally faster or slower, they disagreed, and generally the rowers were more accurate about the performance than their coach. Implications for contemporary coaching practices are considered.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1747954117738886</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1747-9541
ispartof International journal of sports science & coaching, 2017-12, Vol.12 (6), p.807-813
issn 1747-9541
2048-397X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1747954117738886
source EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus with Full Text; Sage Journals Online
title Athlete and coach agreement: Identifying successful performance
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T15%3A18%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Athlete%20and%20coach%20agreement:%20Identifying%20successful%20performance&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sports%20science%20&%20coaching&rft.au=Millar,%20Sarah-Kate&rft.date=2017-12&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=807&rft.epage=813&rft.pages=807-813&rft.issn=1747-9541&rft.eissn=2048-397X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1747954117738886&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1747954117738886%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-3608e8057f937e026722783a0d386768736468753015ff8b3b74594178e323b43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1747954117738886&rfr_iscdi=true