Loading…

A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development

This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2023-03, Vol.237 (1), p.34-46
Main Authors: West, Anna Maria, Oberst, Florian, Tarrier, James, Heyde, Christian, Schlarb, Heiko, Brüggemann, Gert-Peter, Hodder, Simon, Havenith, George
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3
container_end_page 46
container_issue 1
container_start_page 34
container_title Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology
container_volume 237
creator West, Anna Maria
Oberst, Florian
Tarrier, James
Heyde, Christian
Schlarb, Heiko
Brüggemann, Gert-Peter
Hodder, Simon
Havenith, George
description This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone sweating thermal-foot manikin. Eleven males performed running trials on five occasions, wearing shoes of same design, differing in materials and construction, to achieve a range of heat/vapour resistances and air permeabilities. Trials in 20°C/60% RH consisted of three phases: 15 min rest, 40 min running, 15 min recovery. In-shoe temperature/humidity were measured at two sites on the left foot. Thermal sensation/wetness perception/thermal comfort were provided for the left foot and four foot regions. Variations in shoe material and construction resulted in differences in thermal and evaporative resistance. These differences were reflected in in-shoe temperature and in-shoe absolute humidity assessed during wear trials. At the end of the rest period, thermal sensation was strongly related to thermal insulation (r2 = 0.69, p
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1754337120952229
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754337120952229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1754337120952229</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1754337120952229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAUDKLgunr3mD9QzUebtMdlUXdhwYuCt_LSvGjXtlmS7Ir_3tYVD4KnecybGYYh5JqzG861vuW6yKXUXLCqEEJUJ2Q2UZmU5cvp7635ObmIccuYEiVnM7Ja0PSGoYeOOu8T7WFo39uBQqRAk_cTHb5fHwiB4gG6PaTWj4rBUosH7PyuxyFdkjMHXcSrH5yT5_u7p-Uq2zw-rJeLTdZIIVOmFRcGpTFNXhYytybHplJCcQmsyhvjDNPCIUOhjdRWKlZo1VhuHQoE7uScsGNuE3yMAV29C20P4bPmrJ6WqP8uMVqyoyXCK9Zbvw_D2PB__RdPg14u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>West, Anna Maria ; Oberst, Florian ; Tarrier, James ; Heyde, Christian ; Schlarb, Heiko ; Brüggemann, Gert-Peter ; Hodder, Simon ; Havenith, George</creator><creatorcontrib>West, Anna Maria ; Oberst, Florian ; Tarrier, James ; Heyde, Christian ; Schlarb, Heiko ; Brüggemann, Gert-Peter ; Hodder, Simon ; Havenith, George</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone sweating thermal-foot manikin. Eleven males performed running trials on five occasions, wearing shoes of same design, differing in materials and construction, to achieve a range of heat/vapour resistances and air permeabilities. Trials in 20°C/60% RH consisted of three phases: 15 min rest, 40 min running, 15 min recovery. In-shoe temperature/humidity were measured at two sites on the left foot. Thermal sensation/wetness perception/thermal comfort were provided for the left foot and four foot regions. Variations in shoe material and construction resulted in differences in thermal and evaporative resistance. These differences were reflected in in-shoe temperature and in-shoe absolute humidity assessed during wear trials. At the end of the rest period, thermal sensation was strongly related to thermal insulation (r2 = 0.69, p&lt;0.001). During exercise however, thermal sensation, wetness perception and thermal discomfort were related to both thermal insulation and evaporative resistance. Thermal foot manikins provide a sensitive, effective evaluation of footwear thermal properties, which are also reflective of changes to in-shoe parameters during actual use. This discriminate power may be enhanced using higher, more realistic air-speeds during testing, as well as simulating foot movement. While thermal foot manikins are highly sensitive to design features/attributes of footwear (e.g. ventilation openings, air-permeabilities and coatings), subjective evaluations of footwear do not seem to have the same sensitivity and discriminative power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-3371</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-338X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1754337120952229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2023-03, Vol.237 (1), p.34-46</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6223-4265</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1754337120952229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1754337120952229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21913,27924,27925,45059,45447,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>West, Anna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberst, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarrier, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyde, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlarb, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggemann, Gert-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodder, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Havenith, George</creatorcontrib><title>A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</title><description>This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone sweating thermal-foot manikin. Eleven males performed running trials on five occasions, wearing shoes of same design, differing in materials and construction, to achieve a range of heat/vapour resistances and air permeabilities. Trials in 20°C/60% RH consisted of three phases: 15 min rest, 40 min running, 15 min recovery. In-shoe temperature/humidity were measured at two sites on the left foot. Thermal sensation/wetness perception/thermal comfort were provided for the left foot and four foot regions. Variations in shoe material and construction resulted in differences in thermal and evaporative resistance. These differences were reflected in in-shoe temperature and in-shoe absolute humidity assessed during wear trials. At the end of the rest period, thermal sensation was strongly related to thermal insulation (r2 = 0.69, p&lt;0.001). During exercise however, thermal sensation, wetness perception and thermal discomfort were related to both thermal insulation and evaporative resistance. Thermal foot manikins provide a sensitive, effective evaluation of footwear thermal properties, which are also reflective of changes to in-shoe parameters during actual use. This discriminate power may be enhanced using higher, more realistic air-speeds during testing, as well as simulating foot movement. While thermal foot manikins are highly sensitive to design features/attributes of footwear (e.g. ventilation openings, air-permeabilities and coatings), subjective evaluations of footwear do not seem to have the same sensitivity and discriminative power.</description><issn>1754-3371</issn><issn>1754-338X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAUDKLgunr3mD9QzUebtMdlUXdhwYuCt_LSvGjXtlmS7Ir_3tYVD4KnecybGYYh5JqzG861vuW6yKXUXLCqEEJUJ2Q2UZmU5cvp7635ObmIccuYEiVnM7Ja0PSGoYeOOu8T7WFo39uBQqRAk_cTHb5fHwiB4gG6PaTWj4rBUosH7PyuxyFdkjMHXcSrH5yT5_u7p-Uq2zw-rJeLTdZIIVOmFRcGpTFNXhYytybHplJCcQmsyhvjDNPCIUOhjdRWKlZo1VhuHQoE7uScsGNuE3yMAV29C20P4bPmrJ6WqP8uMVqyoyXCK9Zbvw_D2PB__RdPg14u</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>West, Anna Maria</creator><creator>Oberst, Florian</creator><creator>Tarrier, James</creator><creator>Heyde, Christian</creator><creator>Schlarb, Heiko</creator><creator>Brüggemann, Gert-Peter</creator><creator>Hodder, Simon</creator><creator>Havenith, George</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6223-4265</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development</title><author>West, Anna Maria ; Oberst, Florian ; Tarrier, James ; Heyde, Christian ; Schlarb, Heiko ; Brüggemann, Gert-Peter ; Hodder, Simon ; Havenith, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>West, Anna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberst, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarrier, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyde, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlarb, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggemann, Gert-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodder, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Havenith, George</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>West, Anna Maria</au><au>Oberst, Florian</au><au>Tarrier, James</au><au>Heyde, Christian</au><au>Schlarb, Heiko</au><au>Brüggemann, Gert-Peter</au><au>Hodder, Simon</au><au>Havenith, George</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>237</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>34-46</pages><issn>1754-3371</issn><eissn>1754-338X</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone sweating thermal-foot manikin. Eleven males performed running trials on five occasions, wearing shoes of same design, differing in materials and construction, to achieve a range of heat/vapour resistances and air permeabilities. Trials in 20°C/60% RH consisted of three phases: 15 min rest, 40 min running, 15 min recovery. In-shoe temperature/humidity were measured at two sites on the left foot. Thermal sensation/wetness perception/thermal comfort were provided for the left foot and four foot regions. Variations in shoe material and construction resulted in differences in thermal and evaporative resistance. These differences were reflected in in-shoe temperature and in-shoe absolute humidity assessed during wear trials. At the end of the rest period, thermal sensation was strongly related to thermal insulation (r2 = 0.69, p&lt;0.001). During exercise however, thermal sensation, wetness perception and thermal discomfort were related to both thermal insulation and evaporative resistance. Thermal foot manikins provide a sensitive, effective evaluation of footwear thermal properties, which are also reflective of changes to in-shoe parameters during actual use. This discriminate power may be enhanced using higher, more realistic air-speeds during testing, as well as simulating foot movement. While thermal foot manikins are highly sensitive to design features/attributes of footwear (e.g. ventilation openings, air-permeabilities and coatings), subjective evaluations of footwear do not seem to have the same sensitivity and discriminative power.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1754337120952229</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6223-4265</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-3371
ispartof Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2023-03, Vol.237 (1), p.34-46
issn 1754-3371
1754-338X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754337120952229
source SAGE Journals Online; Sage Journals Online
title A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A48%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20thermal%20foot%20manikin%20as%20a%20tool%20for%20footwear%20evaluation%20and%20development&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20P,%20Journal%20of%20sports%20engineering%20and%20technology&rft.au=West,%20Anna%20Maria&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=237&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=34-46&rft.issn=1754-3371&rft.eissn=1754-338X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1754337120952229&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1754337120952229%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1754337120952229&rfr_iscdi=true