Loading…
A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development
This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone...
Saved in:
Published in: | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2023-03, Vol.237 (1), p.34-46 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3 |
container_end_page | 46 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 34 |
container_title | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology |
container_volume | 237 |
creator | West, Anna Maria Oberst, Florian Tarrier, James Heyde, Christian Schlarb, Heiko Brüggemann, Gert-Peter Hodder, Simon Havenith, George |
description | This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone sweating thermal-foot manikin. Eleven males performed running trials on five occasions, wearing shoes of same design, differing in materials and construction, to achieve a range of heat/vapour resistances and air permeabilities. Trials in 20°C/60% RH consisted of three phases: 15 min rest, 40 min running, 15 min recovery. In-shoe temperature/humidity were measured at two sites on the left foot. Thermal sensation/wetness perception/thermal comfort were provided for the left foot and four foot regions. Variations in shoe material and construction resulted in differences in thermal and evaporative resistance. These differences were reflected in in-shoe temperature and in-shoe absolute humidity assessed during wear trials. At the end of the rest period, thermal sensation was strongly related to thermal insulation (r2 = 0.69, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1754337120952229 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754337120952229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_1754337120952229</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_1754337120952229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1LxDAUDKLgunr3mD9QzUebtMdlUXdhwYuCt_LSvGjXtlmS7Ir_3tYVD4KnecybGYYh5JqzG861vuW6yKXUXLCqEEJUJ2Q2UZmU5cvp7635ObmIccuYEiVnM7Ja0PSGoYeOOu8T7WFo39uBQqRAk_cTHb5fHwiB4gG6PaTWj4rBUosH7PyuxyFdkjMHXcSrH5yT5_u7p-Uq2zw-rJeLTdZIIVOmFRcGpTFNXhYytybHplJCcQmsyhvjDNPCIUOhjdRWKlZo1VhuHQoE7uScsGNuE3yMAV29C20P4bPmrJ6WqP8uMVqyoyXCK9Zbvw_D2PB__RdPg14u</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development</title><source>SAGE Journals Online</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>West, Anna Maria ; Oberst, Florian ; Tarrier, James ; Heyde, Christian ; Schlarb, Heiko ; Brüggemann, Gert-Peter ; Hodder, Simon ; Havenith, George</creator><creatorcontrib>West, Anna Maria ; Oberst, Florian ; Tarrier, James ; Heyde, Christian ; Schlarb, Heiko ; Brüggemann, Gert-Peter ; Hodder, Simon ; Havenith, George</creatorcontrib><description>This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone sweating thermal-foot manikin. Eleven males performed running trials on five occasions, wearing shoes of same design, differing in materials and construction, to achieve a range of heat/vapour resistances and air permeabilities. Trials in 20°C/60% RH consisted of three phases: 15 min rest, 40 min running, 15 min recovery. In-shoe temperature/humidity were measured at two sites on the left foot. Thermal sensation/wetness perception/thermal comfort were provided for the left foot and four foot regions. Variations in shoe material and construction resulted in differences in thermal and evaporative resistance. These differences were reflected in in-shoe temperature and in-shoe absolute humidity assessed during wear trials. At the end of the rest period, thermal sensation was strongly related to thermal insulation (r2 = 0.69, p<0.001). During exercise however, thermal sensation, wetness perception and thermal discomfort were related to both thermal insulation and evaporative resistance. Thermal foot manikins provide a sensitive, effective evaluation of footwear thermal properties, which are also reflective of changes to in-shoe parameters during actual use. This discriminate power may be enhanced using higher, more realistic air-speeds during testing, as well as simulating foot movement. While thermal foot manikins are highly sensitive to design features/attributes of footwear (e.g. ventilation openings, air-permeabilities and coatings), subjective evaluations of footwear do not seem to have the same sensitivity and discriminative power.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-3371</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-338X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1754337120952229</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2023-03, Vol.237 (1), p.34-46</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6223-4265</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1754337120952229$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1754337120952229$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21913,27924,27925,45059,45447,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>West, Anna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberst, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarrier, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyde, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlarb, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggemann, Gert-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodder, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Havenith, George</creatorcontrib><title>A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</title><description>This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone sweating thermal-foot manikin. Eleven males performed running trials on five occasions, wearing shoes of same design, differing in materials and construction, to achieve a range of heat/vapour resistances and air permeabilities. Trials in 20°C/60% RH consisted of three phases: 15 min rest, 40 min running, 15 min recovery. In-shoe temperature/humidity were measured at two sites on the left foot. Thermal sensation/wetness perception/thermal comfort were provided for the left foot and four foot regions. Variations in shoe material and construction resulted in differences in thermal and evaporative resistance. These differences were reflected in in-shoe temperature and in-shoe absolute humidity assessed during wear trials. At the end of the rest period, thermal sensation was strongly related to thermal insulation (r2 = 0.69, p<0.001). During exercise however, thermal sensation, wetness perception and thermal discomfort were related to both thermal insulation and evaporative resistance. Thermal foot manikins provide a sensitive, effective evaluation of footwear thermal properties, which are also reflective of changes to in-shoe parameters during actual use. This discriminate power may be enhanced using higher, more realistic air-speeds during testing, as well as simulating foot movement. While thermal foot manikins are highly sensitive to design features/attributes of footwear (e.g. ventilation openings, air-permeabilities and coatings), subjective evaluations of footwear do not seem to have the same sensitivity and discriminative power.</description><issn>1754-3371</issn><issn>1754-338X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFRWT</sourceid><recordid>eNp1UE1LxDAUDKLgunr3mD9QzUebtMdlUXdhwYuCt_LSvGjXtlmS7Ir_3tYVD4KnecybGYYh5JqzG861vuW6yKXUXLCqEEJUJ2Q2UZmU5cvp7635ObmIccuYEiVnM7Ja0PSGoYeOOu8T7WFo39uBQqRAk_cTHb5fHwiB4gG6PaTWj4rBUosH7PyuxyFdkjMHXcSrH5yT5_u7p-Uq2zw-rJeLTdZIIVOmFRcGpTFNXhYytybHplJCcQmsyhvjDNPCIUOhjdRWKlZo1VhuHQoE7uScsGNuE3yMAV29C20P4bPmrJ6WqP8uMVqyoyXCK9Zbvw_D2PB__RdPg14u</recordid><startdate>202303</startdate><enddate>202303</enddate><creator>West, Anna Maria</creator><creator>Oberst, Florian</creator><creator>Tarrier, James</creator><creator>Heyde, Christian</creator><creator>Schlarb, Heiko</creator><creator>Brüggemann, Gert-Peter</creator><creator>Hodder, Simon</creator><creator>Havenith, George</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AFRWT</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6223-4265</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202303</creationdate><title>A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development</title><author>West, Anna Maria ; Oberst, Florian ; Tarrier, James ; Heyde, Christian ; Schlarb, Heiko ; Brüggemann, Gert-Peter ; Hodder, Simon ; Havenith, George</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>West, Anna Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oberst, Florian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tarrier, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heyde, Christian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schlarb, Heiko</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brüggemann, Gert-Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodder, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Havenith, George</creatorcontrib><collection>SAGE Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>West, Anna Maria</au><au>Oberst, Florian</au><au>Tarrier, James</au><au>Heyde, Christian</au><au>Schlarb, Heiko</au><au>Brüggemann, Gert-Peter</au><au>Hodder, Simon</au><au>Havenith, George</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle><date>2023-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>237</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>34</spage><epage>46</epage><pages>34-46</pages><issn>1754-3371</issn><eissn>1754-338X</eissn><abstract>This study investigated the relationship between thermal perceptions during human wear trials and thermal foot manikin measurements of heat and vapour resistance for five running shoes varying in material and construction. Measurements of thermal/evaporative resistance were performed using a 12-zone sweating thermal-foot manikin. Eleven males performed running trials on five occasions, wearing shoes of same design, differing in materials and construction, to achieve a range of heat/vapour resistances and air permeabilities. Trials in 20°C/60% RH consisted of three phases: 15 min rest, 40 min running, 15 min recovery. In-shoe temperature/humidity were measured at two sites on the left foot. Thermal sensation/wetness perception/thermal comfort were provided for the left foot and four foot regions. Variations in shoe material and construction resulted in differences in thermal and evaporative resistance. These differences were reflected in in-shoe temperature and in-shoe absolute humidity assessed during wear trials. At the end of the rest period, thermal sensation was strongly related to thermal insulation (r2 = 0.69, p<0.001). During exercise however, thermal sensation, wetness perception and thermal discomfort were related to both thermal insulation and evaporative resistance. Thermal foot manikins provide a sensitive, effective evaluation of footwear thermal properties, which are also reflective of changes to in-shoe parameters during actual use. This discriminate power may be enhanced using higher, more realistic air-speeds during testing, as well as simulating foot movement. While thermal foot manikins are highly sensitive to design features/attributes of footwear (e.g. ventilation openings, air-permeabilities and coatings), subjective evaluations of footwear do not seem to have the same sensitivity and discriminative power.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1754337120952229</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6223-4265</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1754-3371 |
ispartof | Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2023-03, Vol.237 (1), p.34-46 |
issn | 1754-3371 1754-338X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_1754337120952229 |
source | SAGE Journals Online; Sage Journals Online |
title | A thermal foot manikin as a tool for footwear evaluation and development |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A48%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20thermal%20foot%20manikin%20as%20a%20tool%20for%20footwear%20evaluation%20and%20development&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20P,%20Journal%20of%20sports%20engineering%20and%20technology&rft.au=West,%20Anna%20Maria&rft.date=2023-03&rft.volume=237&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=34&rft.epage=46&rft.pages=34-46&rft.issn=1754-3371&rft.eissn=1754-338X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1754337120952229&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_1754337120952229%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c323t-7612be3bbc48534db4ec962613a094cbfb072fe0e27b37d360576cd1dfe2ea1f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1754337120952229&rfr_iscdi=true |