Loading…

Acute:chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: A systematic review

Acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and training monotony have been criticized as injury risk predictors. Therefore, the use of intensity measures should be oriented to understand the variations of intensity across the season. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the main evidence abou...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2024-12, Vol.238 (4), p.401-416
Main Authors: Rico-González, Markel, González Fernández, Francisco Tomás, Oliveira, Rafael, Clemente, Filipe Manuel
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-1fc380e5b0f0728db0688552f74e55a7d3e10a638bb70cc36713729c23b295dc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-1fc380e5b0f0728db0688552f74e55a7d3e10a638bb70cc36713729c23b295dc3
container_end_page 416
container_issue 4
container_start_page 401
container_title Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology
container_volume 238
creator Rico-González, Markel
González Fernández, Francisco Tomás
Oliveira, Rafael
Clemente, Filipe Manuel
description Acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and training monotony have been criticized as injury risk predictors. Therefore, the use of intensity measures should be oriented to understand the variations of intensity across the season. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the main evidence about the ACWR and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer players. The search was made in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and FECYT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 225 studies initially identified, 27 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Existing literature revealed a variety of designs, ACWR and training monotony ranges, variables assessed and durations of the studies. Overall, the range values for ACWR were 0.4–3.39 AU, while those focused on monotony were 0.49–5.7 AU. Regarding ACWR, the ratios located around 0.85–1.25 could predict lower risk values and ratios around ≥1.50 could predict higher risk values. On the contrary, with respect to training monotony, the ratios are approximately between 0.5 and 2.00 (low values in the preseason and low competition weeks and high values when soccer players are in highly scheduled competition weeks). Nevertheless, ACWR and training monotony methods should be addressed and considered based on their real value before using this indicator to reduce injury risk. In fact, the data did not conclusively define injured and non-injured players. For this reason, utilizing standardized approaches will allow for more precise conclusions about professional soccer players.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/17543371231194283
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17543371231194283</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_17543371231194283</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_17543371231194283</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-1fc380e5b0f0728db0688552f74e55a7d3e10a638bb70cc36713729c23b295dc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpoWnaB-hNL-BUK8WWklsI_YNALy30ZmR5nShNpKB1Evz2dUjppdDTDjt8AzOM3YMYAWj9ADofK6VBKoDJWBp1wQanX6aU-bz81Rqu2Q3RWohCGhAD1s3cvsWpW6UYvOPHmL420dY82dZHbkPN22R98GHJtzHENoaOH2zyJzsQjwdMvF0hJ7QUA_eB71JskKi37YZTdA7TlM84ddTitsccT3jweLxlV43dEN793CH7eHp8n79ki7fn1_lskTkFss2gccoIzCvRCC1NXYnCmDyXjR5jnltdKwRhC2WqSgvnVKFBaTlxUlVyktdODRmcc12KRAmbcpf81qauBFGetiv_bNczozNDdonlOu5TX4b-Ab4B8vRxDw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Acute:chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: A systematic review</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>IMechE Titles Via Sage</source><creator>Rico-González, Markel ; González Fernández, Francisco Tomás ; Oliveira, Rafael ; Clemente, Filipe Manuel</creator><creatorcontrib>Rico-González, Markel ; González Fernández, Francisco Tomás ; Oliveira, Rafael ; Clemente, Filipe Manuel</creatorcontrib><description>Acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and training monotony have been criticized as injury risk predictors. Therefore, the use of intensity measures should be oriented to understand the variations of intensity across the season. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the main evidence about the ACWR and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer players. The search was made in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and FECYT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 225 studies initially identified, 27 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Existing literature revealed a variety of designs, ACWR and training monotony ranges, variables assessed and durations of the studies. Overall, the range values for ACWR were 0.4–3.39 AU, while those focused on monotony were 0.49–5.7 AU. Regarding ACWR, the ratios located around 0.85–1.25 could predict lower risk values and ratios around ≥1.50 could predict higher risk values. On the contrary, with respect to training monotony, the ratios are approximately between 0.5 and 2.00 (low values in the preseason and low competition weeks and high values when soccer players are in highly scheduled competition weeks). Nevertheless, ACWR and training monotony methods should be addressed and considered based on their real value before using this indicator to reduce injury risk. In fact, the data did not conclusively define injured and non-injured players. For this reason, utilizing standardized approaches will allow for more precise conclusions about professional soccer players.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1754-3371</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1754-338X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/17543371231194283</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2024-12, Vol.238 (4), p.401-416</ispartof><rights>IMechE 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-1fc380e5b0f0728db0688552f74e55a7d3e10a638bb70cc36713729c23b295dc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-1fc380e5b0f0728db0688552f74e55a7d3e10a638bb70cc36713729c23b295dc3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1480-7521 ; 0000-0002-9849-0444 ; 0000-0001-6671-6229 ; 0000-0001-9813-2842</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/17543371231194283$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/17543371231194283$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,21913,27922,27924,27925,45059,45447,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rico-González, Markel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González Fernández, Francisco Tomás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, Filipe Manuel</creatorcontrib><title>Acute:chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: A systematic review</title><title>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</title><description>Acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and training monotony have been criticized as injury risk predictors. Therefore, the use of intensity measures should be oriented to understand the variations of intensity across the season. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the main evidence about the ACWR and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer players. The search was made in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and FECYT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 225 studies initially identified, 27 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Existing literature revealed a variety of designs, ACWR and training monotony ranges, variables assessed and durations of the studies. Overall, the range values for ACWR were 0.4–3.39 AU, while those focused on monotony were 0.49–5.7 AU. Regarding ACWR, the ratios located around 0.85–1.25 could predict lower risk values and ratios around ≥1.50 could predict higher risk values. On the contrary, with respect to training monotony, the ratios are approximately between 0.5 and 2.00 (low values in the preseason and low competition weeks and high values when soccer players are in highly scheduled competition weeks). Nevertheless, ACWR and training monotony methods should be addressed and considered based on their real value before using this indicator to reduce injury risk. In fact, the data did not conclusively define injured and non-injured players. For this reason, utilizing standardized approaches will allow for more precise conclusions about professional soccer players.</description><issn>1754-3371</issn><issn>1754-338X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1qwzAQhEVpoWnaB-hNL-BUK8WWklsI_YNALy30ZmR5nShNpKB1Evz2dUjppdDTDjt8AzOM3YMYAWj9ADofK6VBKoDJWBp1wQanX6aU-bz81Rqu2Q3RWohCGhAD1s3cvsWpW6UYvOPHmL420dY82dZHbkPN22R98GHJtzHENoaOH2zyJzsQjwdMvF0hJ7QUA_eB71JskKi37YZTdA7TlM84ddTitsccT3jweLxlV43dEN793CH7eHp8n79ki7fn1_lskTkFss2gccoIzCvRCC1NXYnCmDyXjR5jnltdKwRhC2WqSgvnVKFBaTlxUlVyktdODRmcc12KRAmbcpf81qauBFGetiv_bNczozNDdonlOu5TX4b-Ab4B8vRxDw</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Rico-González, Markel</creator><creator>González Fernández, Francisco Tomás</creator><creator>Oliveira, Rafael</creator><creator>Clemente, Filipe Manuel</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1480-7521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9849-0444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-6229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9813-2842</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Acute:chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: A systematic review</title><author>Rico-González, Markel ; González Fernández, Francisco Tomás ; Oliveira, Rafael ; Clemente, Filipe Manuel</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-1fc380e5b0f0728db0688552f74e55a7d3e10a638bb70cc36713729c23b295dc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rico-González, Markel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>González Fernández, Francisco Tomás</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Rafael</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clemente, Filipe Manuel</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rico-González, Markel</au><au>González Fernández, Francisco Tomás</au><au>Oliveira, Rafael</au><au>Clemente, Filipe Manuel</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Acute:chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>238</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>401</spage><epage>416</epage><pages>401-416</pages><issn>1754-3371</issn><eissn>1754-338X</eissn><abstract>Acute: chronic workload ratio (ACWR) and training monotony have been criticized as injury risk predictors. Therefore, the use of intensity measures should be oriented to understand the variations of intensity across the season. The aim of this systematic review is to summarize the main evidence about the ACWR and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer players. The search was made in PubMed, SPORTDiscus, and FECYT according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. From the 225 studies initially identified, 27 were fully reviewed, and their outcome measures were extracted and analyzed. Existing literature revealed a variety of designs, ACWR and training monotony ranges, variables assessed and durations of the studies. Overall, the range values for ACWR were 0.4–3.39 AU, while those focused on monotony were 0.49–5.7 AU. Regarding ACWR, the ratios located around 0.85–1.25 could predict lower risk values and ratios around ≥1.50 could predict higher risk values. On the contrary, with respect to training monotony, the ratios are approximately between 0.5 and 2.00 (low values in the preseason and low competition weeks and high values when soccer players are in highly scheduled competition weeks). Nevertheless, ACWR and training monotony methods should be addressed and considered based on their real value before using this indicator to reduce injury risk. In fact, the data did not conclusively define injured and non-injured players. For this reason, utilizing standardized approaches will allow for more precise conclusions about professional soccer players.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/17543371231194283</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1480-7521</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9849-0444</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6671-6229</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9813-2842</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1754-3371
ispartof Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part P, Journal of sports engineering and technology, 2024-12, Vol.238 (4), p.401-416
issn 1754-3371
1754-338X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_17543371231194283
source Sage Journals Online; IMechE Titles Via Sage
title Acute:chronic workload ratio and training monotony variations over the season in professional soccer: A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T05%3A55%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Acute:chronic%20workload%20ratio%20and%20training%20monotony%20variations%20over%20the%20season%20in%20professional%20soccer:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%20Institution%20of%20Mechanical%20Engineers.%20Part%20P,%20Journal%20of%20sports%20engineering%20and%20technology&rft.au=Rico-Gonz%C3%A1lez,%20Markel&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=238&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=401&rft.epage=416&rft.pages=401-416&rft.issn=1754-3371&rft.eissn=1754-338X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/17543371231194283&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_17543371231194283%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c312t-1fc380e5b0f0728db0688552f74e55a7d3e10a638bb70cc36713729c23b295dc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_17543371231194283&rfr_iscdi=true