En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A review of the literature

Bladder cancer remains one of the most common malignancies of the genitourinary tract. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) via cystoscopy with examination under anesthesia remains the primary method for determining the diagnosis and clinical stage of bladder cancer. Given the substa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Clinical Urology 2023-01, Vol.16 (1), p.4-11
Main Authors: Kopel, Jonathan, Sharma, Pranav
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-c80e47556f4eee35118d70b7ca1dbd44fa4cf5711d977a9d667d76332037558a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-c80e47556f4eee35118d70b7ca1dbd44fa4cf5711d977a9d667d76332037558a3
container_end_page 11
container_issue 1
container_start_page 4
container_title Journal of Clinical Urology
container_volume 16
creator Kopel, Jonathan
Sharma, Pranav
description Bladder cancer remains one of the most common malignancies of the genitourinary tract. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) via cystoscopy with examination under anesthesia remains the primary method for determining the diagnosis and clinical stage of bladder cancer. Given the substantial cost of treatment and risk of bladder cancer recurrence after TURBT, novel approaches to transurethral resection, such as the en bloc technique, have been developed in an attempt to address these limitations. In this review, we examined the postoperative and oncological outcomes of en bloc TURBT compared to traditional resection techniques. Further prospective clinical studies, however, are still necessary to determine whether these alternative technologies or surgical techniques may improve treatment in bladder cancer patients. Level of evidence: Not applicable.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/2051415821993734
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2051415821993734</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_2051415821993734</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_2051415821993734</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-c80e47556f4eee35118d70b7ca1dbd44fa4cf5711d977a9d667d76332037558a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQhYMouKx795g_UM00SZN6W5ZVFxa86LmkydStdBtJUsV_b8p6EMHTDO_NNzweIdfAbgCUui2ZBAFSl1DXXHFxRhazVMza-a_9kqxi7FsmOa-h1GxB9tuRtoO3NAUzxilgOgQz0IARber9SH2XfeMcBpqmow93dJ3djx4_ZysdkA59wmBSZq_IRWeGiKufuSQv99vnzWOxf3rYbdb7wpYaUmE1Q6GkrDqBiFwCaKdYq6wB1zohOiNsJxWAq5Uytasq5VTFecl4prThS8JOf23wMQbsmvfQH034aoA1cyHN30IyUpyQaF6xefNTGHPC_--_AbKJX3w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A review of the literature</title><source>SAGE</source><creator>Kopel, Jonathan ; Sharma, Pranav</creator><creatorcontrib>Kopel, Jonathan ; Sharma, Pranav</creatorcontrib><description>Bladder cancer remains one of the most common malignancies of the genitourinary tract. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) via cystoscopy with examination under anesthesia remains the primary method for determining the diagnosis and clinical stage of bladder cancer. Given the substantial cost of treatment and risk of bladder cancer recurrence after TURBT, novel approaches to transurethral resection, such as the en bloc technique, have been developed in an attempt to address these limitations. In this review, we examined the postoperative and oncological outcomes of en bloc TURBT compared to traditional resection techniques. Further prospective clinical studies, however, are still necessary to determine whether these alternative technologies or surgical techniques may improve treatment in bladder cancer patients. Level of evidence: Not applicable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2051-4158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-4158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2051-4166</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/2051415821993734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London, England: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Journal of Clinical Urology, 2023-01, Vol.16 (1), p.4-11</ispartof><rights>British Association of Urological Surgeons 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-c80e47556f4eee35118d70b7ca1dbd44fa4cf5711d977a9d667d76332037558a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-c80e47556f4eee35118d70b7ca1dbd44fa4cf5711d977a9d667d76332037558a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5934-2695 ; 0000-0003-3481-8700</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,777,781,789,27903,27905,27906,79113</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kopel, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Pranav</creatorcontrib><title>En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A review of the literature</title><title>Journal of Clinical Urology</title><description>Bladder cancer remains one of the most common malignancies of the genitourinary tract. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) via cystoscopy with examination under anesthesia remains the primary method for determining the diagnosis and clinical stage of bladder cancer. Given the substantial cost of treatment and risk of bladder cancer recurrence after TURBT, novel approaches to transurethral resection, such as the en bloc technique, have been developed in an attempt to address these limitations. In this review, we examined the postoperative and oncological outcomes of en bloc TURBT compared to traditional resection techniques. Further prospective clinical studies, however, are still necessary to determine whether these alternative technologies or surgical techniques may improve treatment in bladder cancer patients. Level of evidence: Not applicable.</description><issn>2051-4158</issn><issn>2051-4158</issn><issn>2051-4166</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLxDAQhYMouKx795g_UM00SZN6W5ZVFxa86LmkydStdBtJUsV_b8p6EMHTDO_NNzweIdfAbgCUui2ZBAFSl1DXXHFxRhazVMza-a_9kqxi7FsmOa-h1GxB9tuRtoO3NAUzxilgOgQz0IARber9SH2XfeMcBpqmow93dJ3djx4_ZysdkA59wmBSZq_IRWeGiKufuSQv99vnzWOxf3rYbdb7wpYaUmE1Q6GkrDqBiFwCaKdYq6wB1zohOiNsJxWAq5Uytasq5VTFecl4prThS8JOf23wMQbsmvfQH034aoA1cyHN30IyUpyQaF6xefNTGHPC_--_AbKJX3w</recordid><startdate>202301</startdate><enddate>202301</enddate><creator>Kopel, Jonathan</creator><creator>Sharma, Pranav</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5934-2695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-8700</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202301</creationdate><title>En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A review of the literature</title><author>Kopel, Jonathan ; Sharma, Pranav</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-c80e47556f4eee35118d70b7ca1dbd44fa4cf5711d977a9d667d76332037558a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kopel, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharma, Pranav</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Urology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kopel, Jonathan</au><au>Sharma, Pranav</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A review of the literature</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Clinical Urology</jtitle><date>2023-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>4</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>4-11</pages><issn>2051-4158</issn><eissn>2051-4158</eissn><eissn>2051-4166</eissn><abstract>Bladder cancer remains one of the most common malignancies of the genitourinary tract. Transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) via cystoscopy with examination under anesthesia remains the primary method for determining the diagnosis and clinical stage of bladder cancer. Given the substantial cost of treatment and risk of bladder cancer recurrence after TURBT, novel approaches to transurethral resection, such as the en bloc technique, have been developed in an attempt to address these limitations. In this review, we examined the postoperative and oncological outcomes of en bloc TURBT compared to traditional resection techniques. Further prospective clinical studies, however, are still necessary to determine whether these alternative technologies or surgical techniques may improve treatment in bladder cancer patients. Level of evidence: Not applicable.</abstract><cop>London, England</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/2051415821993734</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5934-2695</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3481-8700</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2051-4158
ispartof Journal of Clinical Urology, 2023-01, Vol.16 (1), p.4-11
issn 2051-4158
2051-4158
2051-4166
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_2051415821993734
source SAGE
title En bloc transurethral resection of bladder tumor: A review of the literature
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A47%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=En%20bloc%20transurethral%20resection%20of%20bladder%20tumor:%20A%20review%20of%20the%20literature&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Clinical%20Urology&rft.au=Kopel,%20Jonathan&rft.date=2023-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=4&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=4-11&rft.issn=2051-4158&rft.eissn=2051-4158&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/2051415821993734&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_2051415821993734%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c281t-c80e47556f4eee35118d70b7ca1dbd44fa4cf5711d977a9d667d76332037558a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_2051415821993734&rfr_iscdi=true