Loading…

Assessing Local “Diversity”: A Nationally Representative Analysis

The meanings and definition of “diversity” can change across different applications and contexts, but many such meanings have implications for racial difference and racial ideology in the United States. We provide a nationally representative analysis of how everyday Americans assess “diversity” in t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Social currents 2022-04, Vol.9 (2), p.139-158
Main Authors: Rajasekar, Neeraj, Stewart, Evan, Gerteis, Joseph
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-512e4444b8d36934ee4f7f97a0f023fd25ae9c2c21878eb3a6dea8e474531ada3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-512e4444b8d36934ee4f7f97a0f023fd25ae9c2c21878eb3a6dea8e474531ada3
container_end_page 158
container_issue 2
container_start_page 139
container_title Social currents
container_volume 9
creator Rajasekar, Neeraj
Stewart, Evan
Gerteis, Joseph
description The meanings and definition of “diversity” can change across different applications and contexts, but many such meanings have implications for racial difference and racial ideology in the United States. We provide a nationally representative analysis of how everyday Americans assess “diversity” in their own communities. We test how county-level racial, religious, economic, and political heterogeneity predict the view that one lives in a highly diverse locale; we also test how individual-level factors predict such a view. Among the four indicators of local difference, racial difference is most strongly and consistently associated with Americans’ assessments of local diversity. Individual-level factors do not weaken this relationship; rather, local context and individual-level factors conjointly predict assessments of local diversity. Despite the flexible, hyperinclusive nature of diversity discourse, local racial difference is salient in Americans’ assessments of “diversity” in their communities, and this pattern is not simply a product of individual-level factors. Our findings illustrate another dimension of the flexible-yet-racialized nature of diversity discourse in the United States. We also show that Americans are particularly aware of racial difference in their locale, which has implications for social and ideological responses to changing communities and a changing nation.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/23294965211021644
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_23294965211021644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_23294965211021644</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1177_23294965211021644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-512e4444b8d36934ee4f7f97a0f023fd25ae9c2c21878eb3a6dea8e474531ada3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsNQ-gLd9gdSd_ZNNvIVarVAURM9hm8yWlJiUnVjIrQ-iL9cnMaXiRXAuv-GDbxh-jF2DmAJYeyOVTHUaGwkgJMRan7HRkUU6ter8d4_NJZsQbYQQANIk1ozYPCNCoqpZ82VbuJof9p931Q4DVV1_2H_d8ow_ua5qG1fXPX_BbUDCphvQDnk20J4qumIX3tWEk58cs7f7-etsES2fHx5n2TIqZKK7yIBEPcwqKVWcKo2ovfWpdcILqXwpjcO0kIWExCa4Ui4u0SWorTYKXOnUmMHpbhFaooA-34bq3YU-B5Efq8j_VDE405NDbo35pv0Iw9P0j_ANgrlf6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing Local “Diversity”: A Nationally Representative Analysis</title><source>SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)</source><creator>Rajasekar, Neeraj ; Stewart, Evan ; Gerteis, Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>Rajasekar, Neeraj ; Stewart, Evan ; Gerteis, Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>The meanings and definition of “diversity” can change across different applications and contexts, but many such meanings have implications for racial difference and racial ideology in the United States. We provide a nationally representative analysis of how everyday Americans assess “diversity” in their own communities. We test how county-level racial, religious, economic, and political heterogeneity predict the view that one lives in a highly diverse locale; we also test how individual-level factors predict such a view. Among the four indicators of local difference, racial difference is most strongly and consistently associated with Americans’ assessments of local diversity. Individual-level factors do not weaken this relationship; rather, local context and individual-level factors conjointly predict assessments of local diversity. Despite the flexible, hyperinclusive nature of diversity discourse, local racial difference is salient in Americans’ assessments of “diversity” in their communities, and this pattern is not simply a product of individual-level factors. Our findings illustrate another dimension of the flexible-yet-racialized nature of diversity discourse in the United States. We also show that Americans are particularly aware of racial difference in their locale, which has implications for social and ideological responses to changing communities and a changing nation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2329-4965</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2329-4973</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/23294965211021644</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Social currents, 2022-04, Vol.9 (2), p.139-158</ispartof><rights>The Southern Sociological Society 2021</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-512e4444b8d36934ee4f7f97a0f023fd25ae9c2c21878eb3a6dea8e474531ada3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-512e4444b8d36934ee4f7f97a0f023fd25ae9c2c21878eb3a6dea8e474531ada3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9372-8791</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rajasekar, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerteis, Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing Local “Diversity”: A Nationally Representative Analysis</title><title>Social currents</title><description>The meanings and definition of “diversity” can change across different applications and contexts, but many such meanings have implications for racial difference and racial ideology in the United States. We provide a nationally representative analysis of how everyday Americans assess “diversity” in their own communities. We test how county-level racial, religious, economic, and political heterogeneity predict the view that one lives in a highly diverse locale; we also test how individual-level factors predict such a view. Among the four indicators of local difference, racial difference is most strongly and consistently associated with Americans’ assessments of local diversity. Individual-level factors do not weaken this relationship; rather, local context and individual-level factors conjointly predict assessments of local diversity. Despite the flexible, hyperinclusive nature of diversity discourse, local racial difference is salient in Americans’ assessments of “diversity” in their communities, and this pattern is not simply a product of individual-level factors. Our findings illustrate another dimension of the flexible-yet-racialized nature of diversity discourse in the United States. We also show that Americans are particularly aware of racial difference in their locale, which has implications for social and ideological responses to changing communities and a changing nation.</description><issn>2329-4965</issn><issn>2329-4973</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM9Kw0AQhxdRsNQ-gLd9gdSd_ZNNvIVarVAURM9hm8yWlJiUnVjIrQ-iL9cnMaXiRXAuv-GDbxh-jF2DmAJYeyOVTHUaGwkgJMRan7HRkUU6ter8d4_NJZsQbYQQANIk1ozYPCNCoqpZ82VbuJof9p931Q4DVV1_2H_d8ow_ua5qG1fXPX_BbUDCphvQDnk20J4qumIX3tWEk58cs7f7-etsES2fHx5n2TIqZKK7yIBEPcwqKVWcKo2ovfWpdcILqXwpjcO0kIWExCa4Ui4u0SWorTYKXOnUmMHpbhFaooA-34bq3YU-B5Efq8j_VDE405NDbo35pv0Iw9P0j_ANgrlf6A</recordid><startdate>20220401</startdate><enddate>20220401</enddate><creator>Rajasekar, Neeraj</creator><creator>Stewart, Evan</creator><creator>Gerteis, Joseph</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9372-8791</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220401</creationdate><title>Assessing Local “Diversity”: A Nationally Representative Analysis</title><author>Rajasekar, Neeraj ; Stewart, Evan ; Gerteis, Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-512e4444b8d36934ee4f7f97a0f023fd25ae9c2c21878eb3a6dea8e474531ada3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rajasekar, Neeraj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stewart, Evan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gerteis, Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Social currents</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rajasekar, Neeraj</au><au>Stewart, Evan</au><au>Gerteis, Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing Local “Diversity”: A Nationally Representative Analysis</atitle><jtitle>Social currents</jtitle><date>2022-04-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>139</spage><epage>158</epage><pages>139-158</pages><issn>2329-4965</issn><eissn>2329-4973</eissn><abstract>The meanings and definition of “diversity” can change across different applications and contexts, but many such meanings have implications for racial difference and racial ideology in the United States. We provide a nationally representative analysis of how everyday Americans assess “diversity” in their own communities. We test how county-level racial, religious, economic, and political heterogeneity predict the view that one lives in a highly diverse locale; we also test how individual-level factors predict such a view. Among the four indicators of local difference, racial difference is most strongly and consistently associated with Americans’ assessments of local diversity. Individual-level factors do not weaken this relationship; rather, local context and individual-level factors conjointly predict assessments of local diversity. Despite the flexible, hyperinclusive nature of diversity discourse, local racial difference is salient in Americans’ assessments of “diversity” in their communities, and this pattern is not simply a product of individual-level factors. Our findings illustrate another dimension of the flexible-yet-racialized nature of diversity discourse in the United States. We also show that Americans are particularly aware of racial difference in their locale, which has implications for social and ideological responses to changing communities and a changing nation.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/23294965211021644</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9372-8791</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2329-4965
ispartof Social currents, 2022-04, Vol.9 (2), p.139-158
issn 2329-4965
2329-4973
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_23294965211021644
source SAGE:Jisc Collections:SAGE Journals Read and Publish 2023-2024:2025 extension (reading list)
title Assessing Local “Diversity”: A Nationally Representative Analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T07%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20Local%20%E2%80%9CDiversity%E2%80%9D:%20A%20Nationally%20Representative%20Analysis&rft.jtitle=Social%20currents&rft.au=Rajasekar,%20Neeraj&rft.date=2022-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=139&rft.epage=158&rft.pages=139-158&rft.issn=2329-4965&rft.eissn=2329-4973&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/23294965211021644&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1177_23294965211021644%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c284t-512e4444b8d36934ee4f7f97a0f023fd25ae9c2c21878eb3a6dea8e474531ada3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_23294965211021644&rfr_iscdi=true