Loading…

Not burning, but rebuilding: The ABCS of anthropology using multimodal methodologies and DEAF values

In 2019, Ryan Cecil Jobson made the case for ‘letting anthropology burn’, arguing that: “the field of anthropology cannot presume a coherent human subject as its point of departure but must adopt a radical humanism as its political horizon” (2019:328). In this article, Robinson upholds Jobson’s mand...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Multimodality & Society 2024-12, Vol.4 (4), p.468-487
Main Author: Fagan Robinson, Kelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In 2019, Ryan Cecil Jobson made the case for ‘letting anthropology burn’, arguing that: “the field of anthropology cannot presume a coherent human subject as its point of departure but must adopt a radical humanism as its political horizon” (2019:328). In this article, Robinson upholds Jobson’s mandate to adopt a radical humanism, though not by burning, but methodologically rebuilding anthropology using multimodal ethnographic praxis, drawing on learnings from time spent working and learning from DEAF spaces. She charts her intellectual and affective journey from working with deaf artists and educators, through studies in anthropology, and towards transformative encounters with multimodal social semiotics. Through learning to listen and evaluate in DEAF ways, she found that non-deaf, majority-centred ways of conducting research naturally receded, thereby re-scaffolding ethnographic methods, proffering a ready-made approach to inclusive anthropological knowledge-making and a potential means for democratising anthropology from the ground up. Robinson argues that approaching ethnographic praxis in a way that both de-prioritises English-text and prioritises participant-led approaches by default reshapes what constitutes valuable anthropological knowledge, facilitating broader participant inclusion and legibility, while also rendering more apparent entrenched power hierarchies and epistemic imbalances.
ISSN:2634-9795
2634-9809
DOI:10.1177/26349795241282667