Centring urban studies among institutional regimes

This commentary responds to Bas Van Heur's paper 'What, where and who is urban studies?' which assesses the structuring of global urban research by investigating the work of named university centres for urban research. The commentary offers observations and reflections on the historic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dialogues in urban research (Online) 2024-03, Vol.2 (1), p.95-99
Main Author: Dodson, Jago
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c819-d27005381ca28cb033af809be5c537b0d6d2a31b1e12d0dcafad6034a6e5ca4b3
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95
container_title Dialogues in urban research (Online)
container_volume 2
creator Dodson, Jago
description This commentary responds to Bas Van Heur's paper 'What, where and who is urban studies?' which assesses the structuring of global urban research by investigating the work of named university centres for urban research. The commentary offers observations and reflections on the historical development of urban studies beyond Van Heur's account and considers this through a discussion of Australian urban research groupings. In doing so the commentary notes the definitional challenges that apply to urban research formations in the context of wider institutional imperatives and dynamics that complicate their intellectual programs. The commentary notes the value of further narrative historical reflection on the discipline and particular historical experiences.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/27541258231211299
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_27541258231211299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1177_27541258231211299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c819-d27005381ca28cb033af809be5c537b0d6d2a31b1e12d0dcafad6034a6e5ca4b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplj8tqwzAUREVpoSHNB2TnH3B7r2RZ9rKYviCQTfbm6uGgEMtFkhf9-9q0i0JXMxyGGYaxPcIjolJPXMkKuWy4QI7I2_aGbVZWrvD2j79nu5QuACAEigrlhvHOhRx9OBdz1BSKlGfrXSponBbmQ8o-z9lPga5FdGc_uvTA7ga6Jrf71S07vb6cuvfycHz76J4PpWmwLS1XAFI0aIg3Ri-LNDTQaieNFEqDrS0ngRodcgvW0EC2BlFRvSSo0mLL8KfWxCml6Ib-M_qR4leP0K-3-3-3xTcMEkpC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Centring urban studies among institutional regimes</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Dodson, Jago</creator><creatorcontrib>Dodson, Jago</creatorcontrib><description>This commentary responds to Bas Van Heur's paper 'What, where and who is urban studies?' which assesses the structuring of global urban research by investigating the work of named university centres for urban research. The commentary offers observations and reflections on the historical development of urban studies beyond Van Heur's account and considers this through a discussion of Australian urban research groupings. In doing so the commentary notes the definitional challenges that apply to urban research formations in the context of wider institutional imperatives and dynamics that complicate their intellectual programs. The commentary notes the value of further narrative historical reflection on the discipline and particular historical experiences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2754-1258</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2754-1258</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/27541258231211299</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Dialogues in urban research (Online), 2024-03, Vol.2 (1), p.95-99</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c819-d27005381ca28cb033af809be5c537b0d6d2a31b1e12d0dcafad6034a6e5ca4b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dodson, Jago</creatorcontrib><title>Centring urban studies among institutional regimes</title><title>Dialogues in urban research (Online)</title><description>This commentary responds to Bas Van Heur's paper 'What, where and who is urban studies?' which assesses the structuring of global urban research by investigating the work of named university centres for urban research. The commentary offers observations and reflections on the historical development of urban studies beyond Van Heur's account and considers this through a discussion of Australian urban research groupings. In doing so the commentary notes the definitional challenges that apply to urban research formations in the context of wider institutional imperatives and dynamics that complicate their intellectual programs. The commentary notes the value of further narrative historical reflection on the discipline and particular historical experiences.</description><issn>2754-1258</issn><issn>2754-1258</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNplj8tqwzAUREVpoSHNB2TnH3B7r2RZ9rKYviCQTfbm6uGgEMtFkhf9-9q0i0JXMxyGGYaxPcIjolJPXMkKuWy4QI7I2_aGbVZWrvD2j79nu5QuACAEigrlhvHOhRx9OBdz1BSKlGfrXSponBbmQ8o-z9lPga5FdGc_uvTA7ga6Jrf71S07vb6cuvfycHz76J4PpWmwLS1XAFI0aIg3Ri-LNDTQaieNFEqDrS0ngRodcgvW0EC2BlFRvSSo0mLL8KfWxCml6Ib-M_qR4leP0K-3-3-3xTcMEkpC</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Dodson, Jago</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Centring urban studies among institutional regimes</title><author>Dodson, Jago</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c819-d27005381ca28cb033af809be5c537b0d6d2a31b1e12d0dcafad6034a6e5ca4b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dodson, Jago</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dialogues in urban research (Online)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dodson, Jago</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Centring urban studies among institutional regimes</atitle><jtitle>Dialogues in urban research (Online)</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>95-99</pages><issn>2754-1258</issn><eissn>2754-1258</eissn><abstract>This commentary responds to Bas Van Heur's paper 'What, where and who is urban studies?' which assesses the structuring of global urban research by investigating the work of named university centres for urban research. The commentary offers observations and reflections on the historical development of urban studies beyond Van Heur's account and considers this through a discussion of Australian urban research groupings. In doing so the commentary notes the definitional challenges that apply to urban research formations in the context of wider institutional imperatives and dynamics that complicate their intellectual programs. The commentary notes the value of further narrative historical reflection on the discipline and particular historical experiences.</abstract><doi>10.1177/27541258231211299</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2754-1258
ispartof Dialogues in urban research (Online), 2024-03, Vol.2 (1), p.95-99
issn 2754-1258
2754-1258
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1177_27541258231211299
source Sage Journals Online
title Centring urban studies among institutional regimes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T13%3A03%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Centring%20urban%20studies%20among%20institutional%20regimes&rft.jtitle=Dialogues%20in%20urban%20research%20(Online)&rft.au=Dodson,%20Jago&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=95-99&rft.issn=2754-1258&rft.eissn=2754-1258&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/27541258231211299&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1177_27541258231211299%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c819-d27005381ca28cb033af809be5c537b0d6d2a31b1e12d0dcafad6034a6e5ca4b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true