Loading…
Not a Man of Contradiction: Zumárraga as Protector and Inquisitor of the Indigenous People of Central Mexico
Zumárraga's efforts to convert the indigenous peoples of New Spain are characterized by a consistency alien to prevailing twenty-first-century values. A highly educated and pious bishop, who, after his tenure as Protector of the Indians, continued his fight against their enslavement and explore...
Saved in:
Published in: | Hispanic research journal 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.26-40 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-369ed5a642a34a5734a550c5d8f80295e2b0bbe8d94dd1d11b0e97b5aed7b393 |
container_end_page | 40 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | Hispanic research journal |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Castaño, Victoria Ríos |
description | Zumárraga's efforts to convert the indigenous peoples of New Spain are characterized by a consistency alien to prevailing twenty-first-century values. A highly educated and pious bishop, who, after his tenure as Protector of the Indians, continued his fight against their enslavement and explored possibilities for their economic improvement, Zumárraga also rigorously exerted his authority as Apostolic Inquisitor, passing harsh sentences on them. Greenleaf (1961) concludes that the protector and inquisitor was a man of contradiction. Lopes Don (2010) sees an attack against the indigenous leaders, a desperate attempt to restore the friars' authority and make up for the shortcomings of their evangelistic efforts for which he could be considered responsible. This article proposes that Zumárraga acted principally as protector of the common people who suffered at the hand of their indigenous leaders with the connivance of the Spanish authorities. An analysis of his correspondence from the years 1536 and 1537 demonstrates that Zumárraga conceived of his inquisitorial office as the most effective tool to assert authority and protect the indigenous underclass from the spiritual debasement and physical exploitation to which their leaders subjected them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1179/174582011X13183287338059 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1179_174582011X13183287338059</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1179_174582011X13183287338059</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-369ed5a642a34a5734a550c5d8f80295e2b0bbe8d94dd1d11b0e97b5aed7b393</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtOwzAURS0EEqWwB28g4E8cO8xQxadSCww6qJhEL7FTjBK72K6gy2EtbIwEmCIm73ffPYOLEKbknFJZXlCZC8UIpWvKqeJMSc4VEeUBmoxSNmjrw2HOC5UxyeUxOonxhRDGc8ImqL_3CQNegsO-xTPvUgBtm2S9u8RPu_7zIwTYAIaIH4NPpkk-YHAaz93rzkY7roMxPZvhou3GOL8bXo3fduabaEZih5fm3Tb-FB210EVz9tunaHVzvZrdZYuH2_nsapE1rMhTxovSaAFFzoDnIORYBGmEVq0irBSG1aSujdJlrjXVlNbElLIWYLSsecmnSP1gm-BjDKattsH2EPYVJdWYWvVXaoN19mO1rvWhhzcfOl0l2Hc-tAFcY2PF_6V8AXLXdnA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Not a Man of Contradiction: Zumárraga as Protector and Inquisitor of the Indigenous People of Central Mexico</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Castaño, Victoria Ríos</creator><creatorcontrib>Castaño, Victoria Ríos</creatorcontrib><description>Zumárraga's efforts to convert the indigenous peoples of New Spain are characterized by a consistency alien to prevailing twenty-first-century values. A highly educated and pious bishop, who, after his tenure as Protector of the Indians, continued his fight against their enslavement and explored possibilities for their economic improvement, Zumárraga also rigorously exerted his authority as Apostolic Inquisitor, passing harsh sentences on them. Greenleaf (1961) concludes that the protector and inquisitor was a man of contradiction. Lopes Don (2010) sees an attack against the indigenous leaders, a desperate attempt to restore the friars' authority and make up for the shortcomings of their evangelistic efforts for which he could be considered responsible. This article proposes that Zumárraga acted principally as protector of the common people who suffered at the hand of their indigenous leaders with the connivance of the Spanish authorities. An analysis of his correspondence from the years 1536 and 1537 demonstrates that Zumárraga conceived of his inquisitorial office as the most effective tool to assert authority and protect the indigenous underclass from the spiritual debasement and physical exploitation to which their leaders subjected them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1468-2737</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-820X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1179/174582011X13183287338059</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><subject>COLONIAL EVANGELIZATION ; FRAY JUAN DE ZUMÁRRAGA ; INDIGENOUS LEADERS ; INDIGENOUS SLAVERY ; INQUISITION IN MEXICO</subject><ispartof>Hispanic research journal, 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.26-40</ispartof><rights>2012 Maney Publishing 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-369ed5a642a34a5734a550c5d8f80295e2b0bbe8d94dd1d11b0e97b5aed7b393</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Castaño, Victoria Ríos</creatorcontrib><title>Not a Man of Contradiction: Zumárraga as Protector and Inquisitor of the Indigenous People of Central Mexico</title><title>Hispanic research journal</title><description>Zumárraga's efforts to convert the indigenous peoples of New Spain are characterized by a consistency alien to prevailing twenty-first-century values. A highly educated and pious bishop, who, after his tenure as Protector of the Indians, continued his fight against their enslavement and explored possibilities for their economic improvement, Zumárraga also rigorously exerted his authority as Apostolic Inquisitor, passing harsh sentences on them. Greenleaf (1961) concludes that the protector and inquisitor was a man of contradiction. Lopes Don (2010) sees an attack against the indigenous leaders, a desperate attempt to restore the friars' authority and make up for the shortcomings of their evangelistic efforts for which he could be considered responsible. This article proposes that Zumárraga acted principally as protector of the common people who suffered at the hand of their indigenous leaders with the connivance of the Spanish authorities. An analysis of his correspondence from the years 1536 and 1537 demonstrates that Zumárraga conceived of his inquisitorial office as the most effective tool to assert authority and protect the indigenous underclass from the spiritual debasement and physical exploitation to which their leaders subjected them.</description><subject>COLONIAL EVANGELIZATION</subject><subject>FRAY JUAN DE ZUMÁRRAGA</subject><subject>INDIGENOUS LEADERS</subject><subject>INDIGENOUS SLAVERY</subject><subject>INQUISITION IN MEXICO</subject><issn>1468-2737</issn><issn>1745-820X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEtOwzAURS0EEqWwB28g4E8cO8xQxadSCww6qJhEL7FTjBK72K6gy2EtbIwEmCIm73ffPYOLEKbknFJZXlCZC8UIpWvKqeJMSc4VEeUBmoxSNmjrw2HOC5UxyeUxOonxhRDGc8ImqL_3CQNegsO-xTPvUgBtm2S9u8RPu_7zIwTYAIaIH4NPpkk-YHAaz93rzkY7roMxPZvhou3GOL8bXo3fduabaEZih5fm3Tb-FB210EVz9tunaHVzvZrdZYuH2_nsapE1rMhTxovSaAFFzoDnIORYBGmEVq0irBSG1aSujdJlrjXVlNbElLIWYLSsecmnSP1gm-BjDKattsH2EPYVJdWYWvVXaoN19mO1rvWhhzcfOl0l2Hc-tAFcY2PF_6V8AXLXdnA</recordid><startdate>20120201</startdate><enddate>20120201</enddate><creator>Castaño, Victoria Ríos</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120201</creationdate><title>Not a Man of Contradiction: Zumárraga as Protector and Inquisitor of the Indigenous People of Central Mexico</title><author>Castaño, Victoria Ríos</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-369ed5a642a34a5734a550c5d8f80295e2b0bbe8d94dd1d11b0e97b5aed7b393</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>COLONIAL EVANGELIZATION</topic><topic>FRAY JUAN DE ZUMÁRRAGA</topic><topic>INDIGENOUS LEADERS</topic><topic>INDIGENOUS SLAVERY</topic><topic>INQUISITION IN MEXICO</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Castaño, Victoria Ríos</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Hispanic research journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Castaño, Victoria Ríos</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Not a Man of Contradiction: Zumárraga as Protector and Inquisitor of the Indigenous People of Central Mexico</atitle><jtitle>Hispanic research journal</jtitle><date>2012-02-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>26</spage><epage>40</epage><pages>26-40</pages><issn>1468-2737</issn><eissn>1745-820X</eissn><abstract>Zumárraga's efforts to convert the indigenous peoples of New Spain are characterized by a consistency alien to prevailing twenty-first-century values. A highly educated and pious bishop, who, after his tenure as Protector of the Indians, continued his fight against their enslavement and explored possibilities for their economic improvement, Zumárraga also rigorously exerted his authority as Apostolic Inquisitor, passing harsh sentences on them. Greenleaf (1961) concludes that the protector and inquisitor was a man of contradiction. Lopes Don (2010) sees an attack against the indigenous leaders, a desperate attempt to restore the friars' authority and make up for the shortcomings of their evangelistic efforts for which he could be considered responsible. This article proposes that Zumárraga acted principally as protector of the common people who suffered at the hand of their indigenous leaders with the connivance of the Spanish authorities. An analysis of his correspondence from the years 1536 and 1537 demonstrates that Zumárraga conceived of his inquisitorial office as the most effective tool to assert authority and protect the indigenous underclass from the spiritual debasement and physical exploitation to which their leaders subjected them.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1179/174582011X13183287338059</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1468-2737 |
ispartof | Hispanic research journal, 2012-02, Vol.13 (1), p.26-40 |
issn | 1468-2737 1745-820X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1179_174582011X13183287338059 |
source | EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | COLONIAL EVANGELIZATION FRAY JUAN DE ZUMÁRRAGA INDIGENOUS LEADERS INDIGENOUS SLAVERY INQUISITION IN MEXICO |
title | Not a Man of Contradiction: Zumárraga as Protector and Inquisitor of the Indigenous People of Central Mexico |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T12%3A36%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Not%20a%20Man%20of%20Contradiction:%20Zum%C3%A1rraga%20as%20Protector%20and%20Inquisitor%20of%20the%20Indigenous%20People%20of%20Central%20Mexico&rft.jtitle=Hispanic%20research%20journal&rft.au=Casta%C3%B1o,%20Victoria%20R%C3%ADos&rft.date=2012-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=40&rft.pages=26-40&rft.issn=1468-2737&rft.eissn=1745-820X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179/174582011X13183287338059&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1179_174582011X13183287338059%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c264t-369ed5a642a34a5734a550c5d8f80295e2b0bbe8d94dd1d11b0e97b5aed7b393%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |