Loading…

Stratigraphy and Chronology in the 1971-1977 Field Data

Within the large incomplete circular element of the Seip Earthworks(33Ro40), a complex set of cultural remains were built and used in a small but crowded area approximately half way between a portion of the circular wall and Seip-Pricer Mound (Baby and Langlois 1979: Figure 4.2; Frontpiece, this vol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Midcontinental journal of archaeology 2009-01, Vol.34 (1), p.19-52
Main Author: Greber, N'omi B.
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1284-5b61a519b80d65f868c45454aad8c2edb1a3b242e5a178292b4dd053b38fcb5e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1284-5b61a519b80d65f868c45454aad8c2edb1a3b242e5a178292b4dd053b38fcb5e3
container_end_page 52
container_issue 1
container_start_page 19
container_title Midcontinental journal of archaeology
container_volume 34
creator Greber, N'omi B.
description Within the large incomplete circular element of the Seip Earthworks(33Ro40), a complex set of cultural remains were built and used in a small but crowded area approximately half way between a portion of the circular wall and Seip-Pricer Mound (Baby and Langlois 1979: Figure 4.2; Frontpiece, this volume; Otto, this volume). The focus of this chapter is on the structures recovered by the Ohio Historical Society (OHS) from 1971 to 1977. The general construction method used for all seven structures reflects that found in other Ohio Hopewell wooden structures. At some point in time each structure was taken down (decommissioned) and covered by a small mound composed of natural soils mixed with cultural debris. Some mounds also had a second overlying gravel stratum. Prior to the 1930s when the area became a state memorial, plowing impacted all the low mounds and even touched some activity floors. Structural ground plans, interior features, and mound strata vary. Examples of the latter are presented below in discussing the internal construction of each mound and possible relationships among them based on stratigraphic relationships and radiocarbon dates from both OHS field work and from later excavations in the area by the Cleveland Museum of Natural History (1980-1982) and Arizona State University (2005). As background for the discussion, a summary of the OHS field procedures is given.
doi_str_mv 10.1179/mca.2009.004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1179_mca_2009_004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1179_mca_2009_004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1284-5b61a519b80d65f868c45454aad8c2edb1a3b242e5a178292b4dd053b38fcb5e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj8tKAzEYhYMoWKs7HyAP4NT8uUySpdQrFFyo6_DnMu3IdFIyAzJv75S6lAPnbM458BFyC2wFoO39PuCKM2ZXjMkzsuCC60pyDedkwUDWFQCzl-RqGL4ZY8JYWBD9MRYc223Bw26i2Ee63pXc5y5vJ9r2dNwlClZDNZumz23qIn3EEa_JRYPdkG7-ckm-np8-16_V5v3lbf2wqQJwIyvla0AF1hsWa9WY2gSpZiFGE3iKHlB4LnlSCNpwy72MkSnhhWmCV0ksyd3pN5Q8DCU17lDaPZbJAXNHaDdDuyO0m6Hnuj7V277JZY8_uXTRjTh1uTQF-9AOTvy7_AXzIlqP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Stratigraphy and Chronology in the 1971-1977 Field Data</title><source>JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】</source><source>Art &amp; Architecture Source</source><creator>Greber, N'omi B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Greber, N'omi B.</creatorcontrib><description>Within the large incomplete circular element of the Seip Earthworks(33Ro40), a complex set of cultural remains were built and used in a small but crowded area approximately half way between a portion of the circular wall and Seip-Pricer Mound (Baby and Langlois 1979: Figure 4.2; Frontpiece, this volume; Otto, this volume). The focus of this chapter is on the structures recovered by the Ohio Historical Society (OHS) from 1971 to 1977. The general construction method used for all seven structures reflects that found in other Ohio Hopewell wooden structures. At some point in time each structure was taken down (decommissioned) and covered by a small mound composed of natural soils mixed with cultural debris. Some mounds also had a second overlying gravel stratum. Prior to the 1930s when the area became a state memorial, plowing impacted all the low mounds and even touched some activity floors. Structural ground plans, interior features, and mound strata vary. Examples of the latter are presented below in discussing the internal construction of each mound and possible relationships among them based on stratigraphic relationships and radiocarbon dates from both OHS field work and from later excavations in the area by the Cleveland Museum of Natural History (1980-1982) and Arizona State University (2005). As background for the discussion, a summary of the OHS field procedures is given.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0146-1109</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-4271</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1179/mca.2009.004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Routledge</publisher><ispartof>Midcontinental journal of archaeology, 2009-01, Vol.34 (1), p.19-52</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2009, Midwest Archaeological Conference, Inc. All rights reserved. 2009</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1284-5b61a519b80d65f868c45454aad8c2edb1a3b242e5a178292b4dd053b38fcb5e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1284-5b61a519b80d65f868c45454aad8c2edb1a3b242e5a178292b4dd053b38fcb5e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Greber, N'omi B.</creatorcontrib><title>Stratigraphy and Chronology in the 1971-1977 Field Data</title><title>Midcontinental journal of archaeology</title><description>Within the large incomplete circular element of the Seip Earthworks(33Ro40), a complex set of cultural remains were built and used in a small but crowded area approximately half way between a portion of the circular wall and Seip-Pricer Mound (Baby and Langlois 1979: Figure 4.2; Frontpiece, this volume; Otto, this volume). The focus of this chapter is on the structures recovered by the Ohio Historical Society (OHS) from 1971 to 1977. The general construction method used for all seven structures reflects that found in other Ohio Hopewell wooden structures. At some point in time each structure was taken down (decommissioned) and covered by a small mound composed of natural soils mixed with cultural debris. Some mounds also had a second overlying gravel stratum. Prior to the 1930s when the area became a state memorial, plowing impacted all the low mounds and even touched some activity floors. Structural ground plans, interior features, and mound strata vary. Examples of the latter are presented below in discussing the internal construction of each mound and possible relationships among them based on stratigraphic relationships and radiocarbon dates from both OHS field work and from later excavations in the area by the Cleveland Museum of Natural History (1980-1982) and Arizona State University (2005). As background for the discussion, a summary of the OHS field procedures is given.</description><issn>0146-1109</issn><issn>2327-4271</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2009</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptj8tKAzEYhYMoWKs7HyAP4NT8uUySpdQrFFyo6_DnMu3IdFIyAzJv75S6lAPnbM458BFyC2wFoO39PuCKM2ZXjMkzsuCC60pyDedkwUDWFQCzl-RqGL4ZY8JYWBD9MRYc223Bw26i2Ee63pXc5y5vJ9r2dNwlClZDNZumz23qIn3EEa_JRYPdkG7-ckm-np8-16_V5v3lbf2wqQJwIyvla0AF1hsWa9WY2gSpZiFGE3iKHlB4LnlSCNpwy72MkSnhhWmCV0ksyd3pN5Q8DCU17lDaPZbJAXNHaDdDuyO0m6Hnuj7V277JZY8_uXTRjTh1uTQF-9AOTvy7_AXzIlqP</recordid><startdate>20090101</startdate><enddate>20090101</enddate><creator>Greber, N'omi B.</creator><general>Routledge</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20090101</creationdate><title>Stratigraphy and Chronology in the 1971-1977 Field Data</title><author>Greber, N'omi B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1284-5b61a519b80d65f868c45454aad8c2edb1a3b242e5a178292b4dd053b38fcb5e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2009</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Greber, N'omi B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Midcontinental journal of archaeology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Greber, N'omi B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Stratigraphy and Chronology in the 1971-1977 Field Data</atitle><jtitle>Midcontinental journal of archaeology</jtitle><date>2009-01-01</date><risdate>2009</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>19</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>19-52</pages><issn>0146-1109</issn><eissn>2327-4271</eissn><abstract>Within the large incomplete circular element of the Seip Earthworks(33Ro40), a complex set of cultural remains were built and used in a small but crowded area approximately half way between a portion of the circular wall and Seip-Pricer Mound (Baby and Langlois 1979: Figure 4.2; Frontpiece, this volume; Otto, this volume). The focus of this chapter is on the structures recovered by the Ohio Historical Society (OHS) from 1971 to 1977. The general construction method used for all seven structures reflects that found in other Ohio Hopewell wooden structures. At some point in time each structure was taken down (decommissioned) and covered by a small mound composed of natural soils mixed with cultural debris. Some mounds also had a second overlying gravel stratum. Prior to the 1930s when the area became a state memorial, plowing impacted all the low mounds and even touched some activity floors. Structural ground plans, interior features, and mound strata vary. Examples of the latter are presented below in discussing the internal construction of each mound and possible relationships among them based on stratigraphic relationships and radiocarbon dates from both OHS field work and from later excavations in the area by the Cleveland Museum of Natural History (1980-1982) and Arizona State University (2005). As background for the discussion, a summary of the OHS field procedures is given.</abstract><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1179/mca.2009.004</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0146-1109
ispartof Midcontinental journal of archaeology, 2009-01, Vol.34 (1), p.19-52
issn 0146-1109
2327-4271
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1179_mca_2009_004
source JSTOR Archival Journals and Primary Sources Collection【Remote access available】; Art & Architecture Source
title Stratigraphy and Chronology in the 1971-1977 Field Data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A21%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Stratigraphy%20and%20Chronology%20in%20the%201971-1977%20Field%20Data&rft.jtitle=Midcontinental%20journal%20of%20archaeology&rft.au=Greber,%20N'omi%20B.&rft.date=2009-01-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=19&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=19-52&rft.issn=0146-1109&rft.eissn=2327-4271&rft_id=info:doi/10.1179/mca.2009.004&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_infor%3E10_1179_mca_2009_004%3C/crossref_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1284-5b61a519b80d65f868c45454aad8c2edb1a3b242e5a178292b4dd053b38fcb5e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true