Loading…

A Phase 2 Study of Nivolumab for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma or Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Following CAR-T Therapy

Background: Treatment options are limited for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) after CAR-T failure. While checkpoint inhibition may theoretically improve T-cell effector activity following CAR-T, a prospective trial of pembrolizumab (a monoclonal antibody ta...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 2023-11, Vol.142 (Supplement 1), p.3509-3509
Main Authors: Banerjee, Rahul, Lynch, Ryan C, Wu, Qian, Simon, Sylvain, Ujjani, Chaitra S, Till, Brian G, Wuliji, Natalie, Gausman, Daria, Dizon, Joshua, Kwok, Mary L., Lee, Sarah S., Silbermann, Rebecca, Medvedova, Eva, Maloney, David G, Ramos, Jorge Daniel, Shadman, Mazyar, Gauthier, Jordan, Turtle, Cameron J., Gopal, Ajay K, Green, Damian J, Riddell, Stanley R., Cowan, Andrew J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: Treatment options are limited for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (MM) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) after CAR-T failure. While checkpoint inhibition may theoretically improve T-cell effector activity following CAR-T, a prospective trial of pembrolizumab (a monoclonal antibody targeting PD-1 on T-cells) following CD19 CAR-T in NHL showed an ORR of only 25% (Chong Blood 2022). In a recent multicenter NHL cohort (Major Blood Advances 2023), responses were similarly low with both pembrolizumab and nivolumab (nivo). However, nivo has not been studied prospectively in this setting, and the efficacy of checkpoint inhibition after CAR-T failure in MM has not been characterized. Methods: We conducted a single-center phase 2 trial (NCT04205409) of nivo for MM or NHL pts with relapse following any CAR-T product (including investigational products) as their last line of therapy. Nivo monotherapy was dosed 480mg IV every 4 weeks until PD or toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by IMWG or Lugano criteria. Secondary endpoints included safety data for AEs and immune-related AEs (irAEs) using CTCAE v5.0 as well as post-nivo CRS/ICANS using ASTCT criteria. Other endpoints included duration of response (DoR), PFS, CAR-T expansion following first nivo dose, and PD-L1/PD-1 IHC expression on tumor biopsies. Results: We enrolled 20 pts (11 MM, 9 NHL) as detailed in Table 1. Prior to nivo, the best response to CAR-T had been CR in 64% of MM pts and 44% of NHL pts, while 1 MM pt and 1 NHL pt had experienced PD as best response. Median time between CAR-T infusion & C1D1 nivo was 624 days (range 59-1211) in MM and 149 days (range 34-506) in NHL. The ORR was 15% overall: 18% (2/11) for MM and 11% (1/9) for NHL. Characteristics of the 3 responders are detailed in Table 2. Both responders with MM had previously received fully human CAR-T therapies; in NHL, the sole response was in a patient who had received commercial axi-cel. In all 3 cases, clinical benefit was evident following a single nivo dose. Both MM patients achieved a VGPR by light chains (>95% reduction) within 4 weeks; in one patient, PET-CT showed complete resolution of a plasmacytoma that had measured 8.6cm one week before C1D1 nivo. DoR was 687 days for this patient and ≥198 days (ongoing) in the other responder with MM. In NHL, the responding patient - who had had a DS4 response at Day +30 then a DS5 response at Day +60 following axi-cel before starting nivo one month later
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2023-173202