Loading…

Marrow Hypercellularity Does Not Exclude the Diagnosis of Essential Thrombocythemia (ET)

Background: The 2022 WHO criteria do not list bone marrow cellularity as a criterion for ET diagnosis (dx) 1, but a review discussing the International Consensus Classification criteria states that the marrow should be normocellular for age, with rare cases of mild hypercellularity 2. The ELN also c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Blood 2023-11, Vol.142 (Supplement 1), p.3198-3198
Main Authors: Erdos, Katie, Ouseph, Madhu M, Geyer, Julia, Lee, Neville, Abu-Zeinah, Ghaith, Scandura, Joseph M., Silver, Richard T.
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Background: The 2022 WHO criteria do not list bone marrow cellularity as a criterion for ET diagnosis (dx) 1, but a review discussing the International Consensus Classification criteria states that the marrow should be normocellular for age, with rare cases of mild hypercellularity 2. The ELN also cited normocellularity as a key factor in differentiating ET from polycythemia vera (PV) or prefibrotic myelofibrosis (MF), further suggesting that normocellularity is the expected standard in ET 3. However, we encountered a number of cases in our hematology practice with increased cellularity in bona fide ET patients (pts). Therefore, we decided to more systematically review the marrow cellularity and its prognostic impact. Methods: Medical records were queried for pts with ET per the ICD, versions 9-10. The dx of ET per WHO 2022 was confirmed by manual review. Cases lacking marrow biopsy were excluded. Structured query language was used for automated extraction of clinical, lab, and molecular findings. We utilized our previously described natural language processing pipeline to extract cellularity information from marrow reports 4. All hematopathology reports of hypercellular marrows were manually reviewed by 3 observers for confirmation and a randomly selected subset of the core and clot sections were reviewed for histomorphology and cellularity by 2 expert hematopathologists and 1 histomorphologist, blinded to pt age and clinical information prior to their review. Quantitative cellularity was determined independently and then congruently for consensus. Qualitative cellularity was defined using (100-age) ± 20% as the normal range with increases above this range considered hypercellular for age. Disease progression was defined as either progression to post-ET MF (PETMF) or direct transformation to acute myeloid leukemia. Transformation to PV was defined as pts with a JAK2 mutation for whom PV was thoroughly excluded at the time of ET dx but who developed absolute erythrocytosis and met the PV WHO diagnostic criteria later in their disease course. We performed univariable and multivariable analysis of progression, PV transformation, thrombosis and mortality risk using Cox proportional-hazards models. Overall (OS), progression-free (PFS), PV-free (PVFS) and thrombosis-free (TFS) survival were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods. Results: 382 pts met WHO defined ET with marrow dx, of which 145 had pre-treatment diagnostic marrows available for review at Weill Cor
ISSN:0006-4971
1528-0020
DOI:10.1182/blood-2023-187769