Efficacy and Safety of Chemotherapy (DDGP vs VIPD) Followed Radiotherapy Vs Radiotherapy Followed Chemotherapy (DDGP vs VIPD) Vs Radiotherapy Alone for Newly Diagnosed Early Stage Extranodal Natural Killer/T Cell Lymphoma: Final Results of a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial

• Published in: Blood 2023-11, Vol.142 (Supplement 1), p.1690-1690
• Main Authors: Zhang, Mingzhi, Zhang, Lei, Li, Xin, Li, Ling, Wang, Xinhua, Fu, Xiaorui, Sun, Zhenchang, Chang, Yu, Zhang, Xudong, Yu, Hui, Nan, Feifei, Zhou, Zhiyuan, Liu, Xiyang, Wu, Xiaolong, Zou, Liqun, Zhou, Hui, Xue, Hongwei
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0006-4971; 1528-0020
• DOI: 10.1182/blood-2023-188245

Background: Extranodal Natural Killer/T Cell Lymphoma (ENKTL) is a highly aggressive form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), primarily found in Asia and commonly linked to Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection. Despite the treatment efficacy for early stage ENKTL has been improved in recent years, there is no consistent approach for clinical treatment. Current guidelines includes radiotherapy (RT) alone, concurrent chemoradiation therapy (CCRT), sequential chemoradiation, and sandwich chemoradiation. Here we present the final results of the efficacy and safety of sequential therapies of DDGP (dexamethasone, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and pegaspargase) regimen or VIPD (etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin and dexamethasone) regimen combined with RT, and RT alone. M ethods: We conducted a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety of sequential chemotherapy (DDGP vs VIPD regimen) followed by RT, sequential RT followed by chemotherapy, and RT alone in eligible patients with newly diagnosed stage I/II ENKTL. Upon study entry, patients were randomized 1:1:1:1:1 to receive either DDGP regimen followed by RT (DDGP+RT), or VIPD regimen followed by RT (VIPD+RT), or RT followed by DDGP regimen (RT+DDGP), or RT followed by VIPD (RT+VIPD), or RT alone. Patients assigned to the DDGP group were administered cisplatin (20 mg/m 2, intravenous, days 1-4), dexamethasone (15 mg/m 2, intravenous, days 1-5), gemcitabine (800 mg/m 2, intravenous, on days 1 and 8), and pegaspargase (2500 IU/m 2, intramuscular, on day 1). Those in the VIPD group received etoposide (100 mg/m 2, intravenous, days 1-3), ifosfamide (1.2 g/m 2, intravenous, days 1-3), cisplatin (33 mg/m 2, intravenous, days 1-3), and dexamethasone (40mg, intravenous, days 1-4). Both the DDGP and VIPD regimens were repeated every 21 days. For the sequential chemotherapy followed by RT group, patients underwent 3 cycles of either DDGP or VIPD regimen, followed by 50 Gy (2 Gy * 25 times) of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). In the sequential RT followed by chemotherapy group, patients were first given 50 Gy (2 Gy * 25 times) of IMRT and then sequential either DDGP or VIPD regimen. Meanwhile, the RT alone group received 50 Gy (2 Gy * 25 times) of IMRT only. The primary end point of our study was progression free survival (PFS), with secondary end points including complete remission rate (CRR), objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS). R esults: Our study, spanni