Comparison of Sequential Vs Alternating Administration of Bortezomib, Melphalan, Prednisone (VMP) and Lenalidomide Plus Dexamethasone (Rd) in Elderly Pts with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients: GEM2010MAS65 Trial

• Published in: Blood 2014-12, Vol.124 (21), p.178-178
• Main Authors: Mateos, Maria-Victoria, Martinez-Lopez, Joaquin, Hernandez, Miguel-T, Martinez, Rafael, Rosiñol, Laura, Ocio, Enrique M., Echeveste, Maria Asuncion, Pérez de Oteyza, Jaime, Oriol, Albert, Bargay, Joan, Gironella, Mercedes, Martín, Jesús, Cabrera, Carmen, De La Rubia, Javier, Gutiérrez, Norma C, Martin, Maria-Luisa, Paiva, Bruno, Montalbán, Maria Angeles, Bladé, Joan, Lahuerta, Juan José, San Miguel, Jesus F.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• ISSN: 0006-4971; 1528-0020
• DOI: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.178.178

Background: VMP and Rd are two of the most effective regimens in the treatment of elderly newly diagnosed MM pts. In order to further improve its outcome, one possibility would be to use regimens including all these drugs simultaneously, but this may result toxic. Alternatively, the use of these regimens (VMP and Rd) in a sequential or alternating scheme could improve the treatment of these pts. We hypothesized the alternating scheme would minimize the emergence of resistant clones, and would reduce the cumulative toxicity. In order to test this hypothesis we decided to compare VMP and Rd in a sequential vs an alternating scheme. Pts and methods: 242 pts were randomized to receive a sequential scheme consisting on 9 cycles of VMP followed by 9 cycles of Rd or the same regimens in an alternating approach (one cycle of VMP alternating with one Rd, up to 18 cycles. VMP included the iv administration of weekly bortezomib (except in the first cycle that was given twice weekly) at 1.3 mg/m2 in combination with oral melphalan 9 mg/m2 and prednisone 60 mg/m2 once daily on days 1–4. Rd treatment consisted on lenalidomide 25 mg daily on days 1-21 plus dexamethasone 40 mg weekly. Results: 233 pts were evaluable for safety and efficacy (118 in the sequential and 115 in the alternating arm). Both arms were well balanced according to the baseline characteristics. Of note, 55% of pts in the sequential and 44% in the alternating arm were older than 75 yrs. Fifty-one percent in the sequential arm and 52% in the alternating had high risk cytogenetic abnormalities (t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p or 1q gains). After 9 cycles, the sCR/CR rate was lower in the sequential (20%) than in the alternating arm (32%)(p=0.02). However, among the 179 pts that were evaluable for efficacy after the 18 planned cycles of treatment, the pattern reversed: 51% achieved sCR/CR in the sequential vs 38% in the alternating arm (p=0,05). The flow-CR rate among patients in sCR/CR was 66% and 48% in the sequential vs alternating arms, respectively (P=0.16). To achieve flow-CR was associated with a significantly longer TTP (median not reached vs 15 months since the end of treatment; P=.01). After a median f/u of 27 months, median PFS was of 30 months in both sequential and alternating arms (p=NS). Median OS has not been reached, and 68% and 67% of pts are alive at 3 yrs (p=NS). Pts who achieved sCR/CR had significantly longer PFS and OS as compared with pts who did not (3-yrs PFS for sCR/CR of 76% vs 18% f