Loading…
Taperring Treatment According Minimal Residual Disease
In spite its established prognostic role in ALL and being a powerful method for patient stratification, Minimal residual disease in AML is still an area of research need to be investigated to decide its value in AML treatment. In this is a retrospective study, 388 adult AML patients from period 2009...
Saved in:
Published in: | Blood 2015-12, Vol.126 (23), p.4960-4960 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | In spite its established prognostic role in ALL and being a powerful method for patient stratification, Minimal residual disease in AML is still an area of research need to be investigated to decide its value in AML treatment.
In this is a retrospective study, 388 adult AML patients from period 2009-2014 in NCI Cairo University were included, comparing minimal residual disease to other prognostic factors to determine its value as an independent prognostic factor to stratify AML patients and to assess possibility of treatment tapering according MRD.
We divided patients in to 3 groups according cytogenetics: favorable, intermediate, poor risk.
(We considered patients having negative MRD: those having day 28 and day 42 BMA free for MRD less than 0.01)
All patients with FLT3 were excluded prior start this study because we proved by other study its grave prognosis and it outweigh MRD as independent prognostic factor, and eventually those patients will relapse within a short period of time.
5 years disease free survival
First group patient with favorable cytogenetics: included 156 patients. We found that 76 patients who become MRD negative post first cycle induction had significantly better disease free survival 64% and overall survival 61.7% compared to those having persistence MRD ( 80 patient) post first cycle of induction 24%, 14% respectively with p value 0.02.
Out of 76 patients had negative MRD, 29 patients just took 2 cycles of chemotherapy one induction chemotherapy and one consolidation. Those patients continued to maintain CR in spite receiving 2 cycles of chemotherapy which confirm powerful prognostic impact of MRD with DFS : 61, OS 59.3% which showed no significant difference from those who completed their chemotherapy (p value : 0.07)
Those patients didn't continue treatment due to medical problems or non compliance or insurance coverage problems.
Those who had persistence MRD post first cycle of induction had prognosis resembling those of poor cytogenetics. Out of 80 patients having persistent MRD, 9 died prior relapse due to medical problems. 64 relapsed and took salvage chemotherapy then kept under follow up. 23 patient did allogenic bone marrow transplantation, 9 were in CR and were done due to persistence MRD and 14 patient did due to relapse and transplantation were done in second CR. patients who had did allogenic transplantation had better disease free survival and overall survival.
Second group intermediate risk: 103 patients. We had 40 pa |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0006-4971 1528-0020 |
DOI: | 10.1182/blood.V126.23.4960.4960 |