Loading…
Size and strength : do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?
This article describes the development and validation of a test of vocabulary size and strength. The first part of the article sets out the theoretical rationale for the test, and describes how the size and strength constructs have been conceptualized and operationalised. The second part of the arti...
Saved in:
Published in: | Language testing 2004-04, Vol.21 (2), p.202-226 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-304b66fa5edc88cbad3fe65620b9c1360c7510309ee91742ad934dc70bb04ce43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-304b66fa5edc88cbad3fe65620b9c1360c7510309ee91742ad934dc70bb04ce43 |
container_end_page | 226 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 202 |
container_title | Language testing |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Laufer, Batia Elder, Cathie Hill, Kathryn Congdon, Peter |
description | This article describes the development and validation of a test of vocabulary size and strength. The first part of the article sets out the theoretical rationale for the test, and describes how the size and strength constructs have been conceptualized and operationalised. The second part of the article focuses on the process of test validation, which involved the testing of the hypotheses implicit in the test design, using both unidimensional and multifaceted Rasch analyses. Possible applications for the test include determining the status of a learner's vocabulary development as well as screening and placement. A model for administering the test in computer adaptive mode is also proposed. The study has implications both for the design and delivery of this test as well as for theories of vocabulary acquisition. [Author abstract] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1191/0265532204lt277oa |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1191_0265532204lt277oa</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ692537</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.134651</informt_id><sage_id>10.1191_0265532204lt277oa</sage_id><sourcerecordid>85581496</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-304b66fa5edc88cbad3fe65620b9c1360c7510309ee91742ad934dc70bb04ce43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtv1TAQhS1EJS4tPwCJhcWCXcr4mZhNRR9Aq0osgLXl2JPblNz41nZatb-eXFJRCSRWI835zpkHIa8ZHDJm2HvgWinBOcih8LqO7hlZMVnXFRipn5PVTq92wAvyMudrADBM6BU5_dY_IHVjoLkkHNflin6gIdI7pCNioG2cOyXSDbo8JaS30bt2Gly6pz_HeDdgWOPRAdnr3JDx1WPdJz8-nX0_-VJdfv18fvLxsvISWKkEyFbrzikMvml864LoUCvNoTV-3gZ8rRgIMIiG1ZK7YIQMvoa2BelRin3ybsndpngzYS5202ePw-BGjFO2jVINk0bP4Nu_wOs4pXHezXLOBTS8MTPEFsinmHPCzm5Tv5kvswzs7qn2n6fOnjeLB1Pv__BnF9pwJepZPlzk7Nb4NPN_eceLIW36Yh3222KvStlmG1xxth-7-FuJaW1D7HdJQjD9SDIhtWLiF7BjmIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>222308289</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Size and strength : do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Sage Journals Online</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Laufer, Batia ; Elder, Cathie ; Hill, Kathryn ; Congdon, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Laufer, Batia ; Elder, Cathie ; Hill, Kathryn ; Congdon, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>This article describes the development and validation of a test of vocabulary size and strength. The first part of the article sets out the theoretical rationale for the test, and describes how the size and strength constructs have been conceptualized and operationalised. The second part of the article focuses on the process of test validation, which involved the testing of the hypotheses implicit in the test design, using both unidimensional and multifaceted Rasch analyses. Possible applications for the test include determining the status of a learner's vocabulary development as well as screening and placement. A model for administering the test in computer adaptive mode is also proposed. The study has implications both for the design and delivery of this test as well as for theories of vocabulary acquisition. [Author abstract]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0265-5322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-0946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1191/0265532204lt277oa</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LATEEU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications</publisher><subject>Associative Learning ; Computer assisted testing ; Foreign language learning ; Language acquisition ; Language tests ; Learning Processes ; Linguistics ; Rasch model ; Second language learning ; Studies ; Test Construction ; Test validity ; Vocabulary ; Vocabulary Development ; Vocabulary learning ; Vocabulary size ; Vocabulary skills</subject><ispartof>Language testing, 2004-04, Vol.21 (2), p.202-226</ispartof><rights>2004 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-304b66fa5edc88cbad3fe65620b9c1360c7510309ee91742ad934dc70bb04ce43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-304b66fa5edc88cbad3fe65620b9c1360c7510309ee91742ad934dc70bb04ce43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/222308289?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12851,21378,21382,21394,27924,27925,31269,31270,33611,33612,33877,33878,33911,33912,43733,43880,43896,62661,62662,62664,62677,79364</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ692537$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Laufer, Batia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elder, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Size and strength : do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?</title><title>Language testing</title><description>This article describes the development and validation of a test of vocabulary size and strength. The first part of the article sets out the theoretical rationale for the test, and describes how the size and strength constructs have been conceptualized and operationalised. The second part of the article focuses on the process of test validation, which involved the testing of the hypotheses implicit in the test design, using both unidimensional and multifaceted Rasch analyses. Possible applications for the test include determining the status of a learner's vocabulary development as well as screening and placement. A model for administering the test in computer adaptive mode is also proposed. The study has implications both for the design and delivery of this test as well as for theories of vocabulary acquisition. [Author abstract]</description><subject>Associative Learning</subject><subject>Computer assisted testing</subject><subject>Foreign language learning</subject><subject>Language acquisition</subject><subject>Language tests</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Linguistics</subject><subject>Rasch model</subject><subject>Second language learning</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test validity</subject><subject>Vocabulary</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><subject>Vocabulary learning</subject><subject>Vocabulary size</subject><subject>Vocabulary skills</subject><issn>0265-5322</issn><issn>1477-0946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEtv1TAQhS1EJS4tPwCJhcWCXcr4mZhNRR9Aq0osgLXl2JPblNz41nZatb-eXFJRCSRWI835zpkHIa8ZHDJm2HvgWinBOcih8LqO7hlZMVnXFRipn5PVTq92wAvyMudrADBM6BU5_dY_IHVjoLkkHNflin6gIdI7pCNioG2cOyXSDbo8JaS30bt2Gly6pz_HeDdgWOPRAdnr3JDx1WPdJz8-nX0_-VJdfv18fvLxsvISWKkEyFbrzikMvml864LoUCvNoTV-3gZ8rRgIMIiG1ZK7YIQMvoa2BelRin3ybsndpngzYS5202ePw-BGjFO2jVINk0bP4Nu_wOs4pXHezXLOBTS8MTPEFsinmHPCzm5Tv5kvswzs7qn2n6fOnjeLB1Pv__BnF9pwJepZPlzk7Nb4NPN_eceLIW36Yh3222KvStlmG1xxth-7-FuJaW1D7HdJQjD9SDIhtWLiF7BjmIw</recordid><startdate>200404</startdate><enddate>200404</enddate><creator>Laufer, Batia</creator><creator>Elder, Cathie</creator><creator>Hill, Kathryn</creator><creator>Congdon, Peter</creator><general>Sage Publications</general><general>Hodder Arnold Journals, Turpin-Distribution, Stratton Business Park, Pegasus Drive, Biggleswade, Bedfordshire SG18 8QB UK</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200404</creationdate><title>Size and strength : do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?</title><author>Laufer, Batia ; Elder, Cathie ; Hill, Kathryn ; Congdon, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-304b66fa5edc88cbad3fe65620b9c1360c7510309ee91742ad934dc70bb04ce43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Associative Learning</topic><topic>Computer assisted testing</topic><topic>Foreign language learning</topic><topic>Language acquisition</topic><topic>Language tests</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Linguistics</topic><topic>Rasch model</topic><topic>Second language learning</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test validity</topic><topic>Vocabulary</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><topic>Vocabulary learning</topic><topic>Vocabulary size</topic><topic>Vocabulary skills</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Laufer, Batia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elder, Cathie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hill, Kathryn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Congdon, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Language testing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Laufer, Batia</au><au>Elder, Cathie</au><au>Hill, Kathryn</au><au>Congdon, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ692537</ericid><atitle>Size and strength : do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge?</atitle><jtitle>Language testing</jtitle><date>2004-04</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>226</epage><pages>202-226</pages><issn>0265-5322</issn><eissn>1477-0946</eissn><coden>LATEEU</coden><abstract>This article describes the development and validation of a test of vocabulary size and strength. The first part of the article sets out the theoretical rationale for the test, and describes how the size and strength constructs have been conceptualized and operationalised. The second part of the article focuses on the process of test validation, which involved the testing of the hypotheses implicit in the test design, using both unidimensional and multifaceted Rasch analyses. Possible applications for the test include determining the status of a learner's vocabulary development as well as screening and placement. A model for administering the test in computer adaptive mode is also proposed. The study has implications both for the design and delivery of this test as well as for theories of vocabulary acquisition. [Author abstract]</abstract><cop>Thousand Oaks, CA</cop><pub>Sage Publications</pub><doi>10.1191/0265532204lt277oa</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0265-5322 |
ispartof | Language testing, 2004-04, Vol.21 (2), p.202-226 |
issn | 0265-5322 1477-0946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1191_0265532204lt277oa |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Sage Journals Online; Education Collection |
subjects | Associative Learning Computer assisted testing Foreign language learning Language acquisition Language tests Learning Processes Linguistics Rasch model Second language learning Studies Test Construction Test validity Vocabulary Vocabulary Development Vocabulary learning Vocabulary size Vocabulary skills |
title | Size and strength : do we need both to measure vocabulary knowledge? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A03%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Size%20and%20strength%20:%20do%20we%20need%20both%20to%20measure%20vocabulary%20knowledge?&rft.jtitle=Language%20testing&rft.au=Laufer,%20Batia&rft.date=2004-04&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=226&rft.pages=202-226&rft.issn=0265-5322&rft.eissn=1477-0946&rft.coden=LATEEU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1191/0265532204lt277oa&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E85581496%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-304b66fa5edc88cbad3fe65620b9c1360c7510309ee91742ad934dc70bb04ce43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=222308289&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ692537&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.134651&rft_sage_id=10.1191_0265532204lt277oa&rfr_iscdi=true |