Self-Complexity and Well-Being: A Review and Research Synthesis

We reviewed the extant literature examining Linville's (1985, 1987) self-complexity (SC) model. SC is a structural feature of people's self-knowledge. Linville (1987) proposed that SC serves as a cognitive buffer against extreme affective reactions to life events. We report results of two...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Personality and Social Psychology Review 2002-02, Vol.6 (1), p.31-58
Main Authors: Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol, Steinberg, Jennifer
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-31987719135640057250a119a824155c339e469ed95d895a26ec1de520b713943
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-31987719135640057250a119a824155c339e469ed95d895a26ec1de520b713943
container_end_page 58
container_issue 1
container_start_page 31
container_title Personality and Social Psychology Review
container_volume 6
creator Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol
Steinberg, Jennifer
description We reviewed the extant literature examining Linville's (1985, 1987) self-complexity (SC) model. SC is a structural feature of people's self-knowledge. Linville (1987) proposed that SC serves as a cognitive buffer against extreme affective reactions to life events. We report results of two procedures: a classic meta-analysis and a more primitive vote-counting procedure. Overall, SC was negatively, but weakly, related to well-being, a relationship qualified by strong heterogeneity among studies. We found little support for SC as a stress buffer, but more support as a moderator of uplifting events. Several methodological and substantive variables (e.g., the type of well-being studied, the valence of SC, and characteristics of the samples and designs used) were associated with effect magnitude. We discuss implications for competing theories of self-structure and comment on the use of information theory in studying the self.
doi_str_mv 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>sage_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1207_S15327957PSPR0601_2</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1207_S15327957PSPR0601_2</sage_id><sourcerecordid>10.1207_S15327957PSPR0601_2</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-31987719135640057250a119a824155c339e469ed95d895a26ec1de520b713943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBFzyAoZdO45tLqhE_EmVqBIQx8gkmzZVmlRx-cnbk1COiNOsZvStRsPYOcIFCtCXKSoptFV6kS4SiAAzccAmo8lH93C4wRhuIiOP2Yn3awCIjMUJu06pLnncbrY1fVW7PnBNEbxSXfMbqprlVTALEvqo6PMnSMiT6_JVkPbNbkW-8qfsqHS1p7NfnbKXu9vn-IHPn-4f49mc51KFOy7RGq3RolRRCKC0UOAQrTMiRKVyKS2FkaXCqsJY5UREORakBLxplDaUUyb3f_Ou9b6jMtt21cZ1fYaQjRtkf2wwULCnvFtStm7fu2Yo-S_yDS1kW3I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Self-Complexity and Well-Being: A Review and Research Synthesis</title><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>SAGE</source><creator>Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol ; Steinberg, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol ; Steinberg, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>We reviewed the extant literature examining Linville's (1985, 1987) self-complexity (SC) model. SC is a structural feature of people's self-knowledge. Linville (1987) proposed that SC serves as a cognitive buffer against extreme affective reactions to life events. We report results of two procedures: a classic meta-analysis and a more primitive vote-counting procedure. Overall, SC was negatively, but weakly, related to well-being, a relationship qualified by strong heterogeneity among studies. We found little support for SC as a stress buffer, but more support as a moderator of uplifting events. Several methodological and substantive variables (e.g., the type of well-being studied, the valence of SC, and characteristics of the samples and designs used) were associated with effect magnitude. We discuss implications for competing theories of self-structure and comment on the use of information theory in studying the self.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1088-8683</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7957</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><ispartof>Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2002-02, Vol.6 (1), p.31-58</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-31987719135640057250a119a824155c339e469ed95d895a26ec1de520b713943</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-31987719135640057250a119a824155c339e469ed95d895a26ec1de520b713943</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>313,314,780,784,792,27922,27924,27925,79364</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>Self-Complexity and Well-Being: A Review and Research Synthesis</title><title>Personality and Social Psychology Review</title><description>We reviewed the extant literature examining Linville's (1985, 1987) self-complexity (SC) model. SC is a structural feature of people's self-knowledge. Linville (1987) proposed that SC serves as a cognitive buffer against extreme affective reactions to life events. We report results of two procedures: a classic meta-analysis and a more primitive vote-counting procedure. Overall, SC was negatively, but weakly, related to well-being, a relationship qualified by strong heterogeneity among studies. We found little support for SC as a stress buffer, but more support as a moderator of uplifting events. Several methodological and substantive variables (e.g., the type of well-being studied, the valence of SC, and characteristics of the samples and designs used) were associated with effect magnitude. We discuss implications for competing theories of self-structure and comment on the use of information theory in studying the self.</description><issn>1088-8683</issn><issn>1532-7957</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1OwzAQhC0EEqXwBFzyAoZdO45tLqhE_EmVqBIQx8gkmzZVmlRx-cnbk1COiNOsZvStRsPYOcIFCtCXKSoptFV6kS4SiAAzccAmo8lH93C4wRhuIiOP2Yn3awCIjMUJu06pLnncbrY1fVW7PnBNEbxSXfMbqprlVTALEvqo6PMnSMiT6_JVkPbNbkW-8qfsqHS1p7NfnbKXu9vn-IHPn-4f49mc51KFOy7RGq3RolRRCKC0UOAQrTMiRKVyKS2FkaXCqsJY5UREORakBLxplDaUUyb3f_Ou9b6jMtt21cZ1fYaQjRtkf2wwULCnvFtStm7fu2Yo-S_yDS1kW3I</recordid><startdate>200202</startdate><enddate>200202</enddate><creator>Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol</creator><creator>Steinberg, Jennifer</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200202</creationdate><title>Self-Complexity and Well-Being: A Review and Research Synthesis</title><author>Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol ; Steinberg, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-31987719135640057250a119a824155c339e469ed95d895a26ec1de520b713943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steinberg, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Personality and Social Psychology Review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rafaeli-Mor, Eshkol</au><au>Steinberg, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Self-Complexity and Well-Being: A Review and Research Synthesis</atitle><jtitle>Personality and Social Psychology Review</jtitle><date>2002-02</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>31</spage><epage>58</epage><pages>31-58</pages><issn>1088-8683</issn><eissn>1532-7957</eissn><abstract>We reviewed the extant literature examining Linville's (1985, 1987) self-complexity (SC) model. SC is a structural feature of people's self-knowledge. Linville (1987) proposed that SC serves as a cognitive buffer against extreme affective reactions to life events. We report results of two procedures: a classic meta-analysis and a more primitive vote-counting procedure. Overall, SC was negatively, but weakly, related to well-being, a relationship qualified by strong heterogeneity among studies. We found little support for SC as a stress buffer, but more support as a moderator of uplifting events. Several methodological and substantive variables (e.g., the type of well-being studied, the valence of SC, and characteristics of the samples and designs used) were associated with effect magnitude. We discuss implications for competing theories of self-structure and comment on the use of information theory in studying the self.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_2</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1088-8683
ispartof Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2002-02, Vol.6 (1), p.31-58
issn 1088-8683
1532-7957
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1207_S15327957PSPR0601_2
source Business Source Ultimate; SAGE
title Self-Complexity and Well-Being: A Review and Research Synthesis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T06%3A22%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-sage_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Self-Complexity%20and%20Well-Being:%20A%20Review%20and%20Research%20Synthesis&rft.jtitle=Personality%20and%20Social%20Psychology%20Review&rft.au=Rafaeli-Mor,%20Eshkol&rft.date=2002-02&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=31&rft.epage=58&rft.pages=31-58&rft.issn=1088-8683&rft.eissn=1532-7957&rft_id=info:doi/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0601_2&rft_dat=%3Csage_cross%3E10.1207_S15327957PSPR0601_2%3C/sage_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-31987719135640057250a119a824155c339e469ed95d895a26ec1de520b713943%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1207_S15327957PSPR0601_2&rfr_iscdi=true