Loading…

Skulls, Tree Bark, Fossils

Studies of material objects in the field of memory studies have followed diverse epistemological and disciplinary trajectories, but their shared characteristic has been the questioning of philosophical assumptions concerning human relations with inanimate things and lower-level organic objects, such...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Qui parle 2021-12, Vol.30 (2), p.249-291
Main Author: Zolkos, Magdalena
Format: Article
Language:English
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-b29126642a899086c6e6bd8b9f1a2f4079de9b1ef62ee1d07f9b7c9f5b7a99163
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-b29126642a899086c6e6bd8b9f1a2f4079de9b1ef62ee1d07f9b7c9f5b7a99163
container_end_page 291
container_issue 2
container_start_page 249
container_title Qui parle
container_volume 30
creator Zolkos, Magdalena
description Studies of material objects in the field of memory studies have followed diverse epistemological and disciplinary trajectories, but their shared characteristic has been the questioning of philosophical assumptions concerning human relations with inanimate things and lower-level organic objects, such as plants, within the Aristotelian hierarchy of beings. Rather than accept at face value their categorizations as passive or deficient in comparison to the human subject, critical scholarship has reformulated the place and role of nonhuman entities in culture. This essay examines the nexus of materiality and memory in the work of the French philosopher and art historian Georges Didi-Huberman, with the focus on the questions of mnemonic affordance of things and plants. The essay proposes that Didi-Huberman’s project can be approached from the perspective of “undoing” the key binaries of Western historiography of art and material culture: surface/depth, exteriority/interiority, visibility/invisibility, and malleability/rigidity. Focusing on imaginal representations of memory objects in Didi-Huberman’s two essays Bark and Being a Skull, the essay situates these texts within the context of his philosophical reading of Aby Warburg’s iconology, and argues that Didi-Huberman’s undoing of the binaries that have traditionally structured thinking about materiality and memory could be productively approached as a philosophical project of transvaluating surface.
doi_str_mv 10.1215/10418385-9395279
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>crossref</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1215_10418385_9395279</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1215_10418385_9395279</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-b29126642a899086c6e6bd8b9f1a2f4079de9b1ef62ee1d07f9b7c9f5b7a99163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0FLAzEUhIMoWGrv4ml_QKPv5e0meUcttgoFD9ZzSHZfoHZFSfDgv3eLdS4zMDDDp9Q1wi0a7O4QWvTkO83EnXF8pmbI5LUHA-dTnmp97C_VotZ3mERMhHambl4P3-NYl82uiDQPsRyWzfqz1v1Yr9RFjmOVxcnn6m39uFs96e3L5nl1v9U9ErBOhtFY25romcHb3opNg0-cMZrcguNBOKFka0RwAJc5uZ5zl1xkRktzBX-7fZmOi-TwVfYfsfwEhHDEC_944YRHv7_4P2M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Skulls, Tree Bark, Fossils</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection</source><creator>Zolkos, Magdalena</creator><creatorcontrib>Zolkos, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of material objects in the field of memory studies have followed diverse epistemological and disciplinary trajectories, but their shared characteristic has been the questioning of philosophical assumptions concerning human relations with inanimate things and lower-level organic objects, such as plants, within the Aristotelian hierarchy of beings. Rather than accept at face value their categorizations as passive or deficient in comparison to the human subject, critical scholarship has reformulated the place and role of nonhuman entities in culture. This essay examines the nexus of materiality and memory in the work of the French philosopher and art historian Georges Didi-Huberman, with the focus on the questions of mnemonic affordance of things and plants. The essay proposes that Didi-Huberman’s project can be approached from the perspective of “undoing” the key binaries of Western historiography of art and material culture: surface/depth, exteriority/interiority, visibility/invisibility, and malleability/rigidity. Focusing on imaginal representations of memory objects in Didi-Huberman’s two essays Bark and Being a Skull, the essay situates these texts within the context of his philosophical reading of Aby Warburg’s iconology, and argues that Didi-Huberman’s undoing of the binaries that have traditionally structured thinking about materiality and memory could be productively approached as a philosophical project of transvaluating surface.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1041-8385</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-8020</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1215/10418385-9395279</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Qui parle, 2021-12, Vol.30 (2), p.249-291</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-b29126642a899086c6e6bd8b9f1a2f4079de9b1ef62ee1d07f9b7c9f5b7a99163</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-b29126642a899086c6e6bd8b9f1a2f4079de9b1ef62ee1d07f9b7c9f5b7a99163</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zolkos, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><title>Skulls, Tree Bark, Fossils</title><title>Qui parle</title><description>Studies of material objects in the field of memory studies have followed diverse epistemological and disciplinary trajectories, but their shared characteristic has been the questioning of philosophical assumptions concerning human relations with inanimate things and lower-level organic objects, such as plants, within the Aristotelian hierarchy of beings. Rather than accept at face value their categorizations as passive or deficient in comparison to the human subject, critical scholarship has reformulated the place and role of nonhuman entities in culture. This essay examines the nexus of materiality and memory in the work of the French philosopher and art historian Georges Didi-Huberman, with the focus on the questions of mnemonic affordance of things and plants. The essay proposes that Didi-Huberman’s project can be approached from the perspective of “undoing” the key binaries of Western historiography of art and material culture: surface/depth, exteriority/interiority, visibility/invisibility, and malleability/rigidity. Focusing on imaginal representations of memory objects in Didi-Huberman’s two essays Bark and Being a Skull, the essay situates these texts within the context of his philosophical reading of Aby Warburg’s iconology, and argues that Didi-Huberman’s undoing of the binaries that have traditionally structured thinking about materiality and memory could be productively approached as a philosophical project of transvaluating surface.</description><issn>1041-8385</issn><issn>1938-8020</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo1j0FLAzEUhIMoWGrv4ml_QKPv5e0meUcttgoFD9ZzSHZfoHZFSfDgv3eLdS4zMDDDp9Q1wi0a7O4QWvTkO83EnXF8pmbI5LUHA-dTnmp97C_VotZ3mERMhHambl4P3-NYl82uiDQPsRyWzfqz1v1Yr9RFjmOVxcnn6m39uFs96e3L5nl1v9U9ErBOhtFY25romcHb3opNg0-cMZrcguNBOKFka0RwAJc5uZ5zl1xkRktzBX-7fZmOi-TwVfYfsfwEhHDEC_944YRHv7_4P2M</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Zolkos, Magdalena</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Skulls, Tree Bark, Fossils</title><author>Zolkos, Magdalena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-b29126642a899086c6e6bd8b9f1a2f4079de9b1ef62ee1d07f9b7c9f5b7a99163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zolkos, Magdalena</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Qui parle</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zolkos, Magdalena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Skulls, Tree Bark, Fossils</atitle><jtitle>Qui parle</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>291</epage><pages>249-291</pages><issn>1041-8385</issn><eissn>1938-8020</eissn><abstract>Studies of material objects in the field of memory studies have followed diverse epistemological and disciplinary trajectories, but their shared characteristic has been the questioning of philosophical assumptions concerning human relations with inanimate things and lower-level organic objects, such as plants, within the Aristotelian hierarchy of beings. Rather than accept at face value their categorizations as passive or deficient in comparison to the human subject, critical scholarship has reformulated the place and role of nonhuman entities in culture. This essay examines the nexus of materiality and memory in the work of the French philosopher and art historian Georges Didi-Huberman, with the focus on the questions of mnemonic affordance of things and plants. The essay proposes that Didi-Huberman’s project can be approached from the perspective of “undoing” the key binaries of Western historiography of art and material culture: surface/depth, exteriority/interiority, visibility/invisibility, and malleability/rigidity. Focusing on imaginal representations of memory objects in Didi-Huberman’s two essays Bark and Being a Skull, the essay situates these texts within the context of his philosophical reading of Aby Warburg’s iconology, and argues that Didi-Huberman’s undoing of the binaries that have traditionally structured thinking about materiality and memory could be productively approached as a philosophical project of transvaluating surface.</abstract><doi>10.1215/10418385-9395279</doi><tpages>43</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1041-8385
ispartof Qui parle, 2021-12, Vol.30 (2), p.249-291
issn 1041-8385
1938-8020
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1215_10418385_9395279
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; Project Muse:Jisc Collections:Project MUSE Journals Agreement 2024:Premium Collection
title Skulls, Tree Bark, Fossils
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-24T01%3A56%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Skulls,%20Tree%20Bark,%20Fossils&rft.jtitle=Qui%20parle&rft.au=Zolkos,%20Magdalena&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=291&rft.pages=249-291&rft.issn=1041-8385&rft.eissn=1938-8020&rft_id=info:doi/10.1215/10418385-9395279&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref%3E10_1215_10418385_9395279%3C/crossref%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1309-b29126642a899086c6e6bd8b9f1a2f4079de9b1ef62ee1d07f9b7c9f5b7a99163%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true