Loading…

A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment

To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil. Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-ope...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Dento-maxillo-facial radiology 2003-11, Vol.32 (6), p.397-400
Main Authors: Sakakura, C E, Morais, J A N D, Loffredo, L C M, Scaf, G
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3
container_end_page 400
container_issue 6
container_start_page 397
container_title Dento-maxillo-facial radiology
container_volume 32
creator Sakakura, C E
Morais, J A N D
Loffredo, L C M
Scaf, G
description To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil. Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-operative implant site assessment and for follow-up, particularly with respect to cost, patient radiation dose, and broad coverage of facial bones and teeth. Epi-Info 6.04 software was used to analyse the database file. Approximately 63.8% of the dentists prescribed only panoramic radiography for dental implant assessment and 28.9% ordered panoramic radiography plus periapical radiography and/or conventional tomography and/or computed tomography (CT). Only 7.2% of the dentists ordered conventional tomography or CT as a single examination, although 10.1% ordered it in combination with other imaging modalities. The main reasons given for prescribing panoramic radiography were broad coverage and cost (86.4%). This study has shown that most of the dentists in this study prescribe panoramic radiographs in dental implant assessment based on broad coverage and cost. They are not following the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommendations regarding cross-sectional imaging.
doi_str_mv 10.1259/dmfr/20681066
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1259_dmfr_20681066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15070843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKA0EQRRtRTIwu3Ur_wJjq58wsY_AFATcK2Q2V6WptyTzongj5eyck4qrg1uHCPYzdCrgX0pRz1_g4l2ALAdaesanQuc2MlutzNgVpICuUXE_YVUrfAKCVsZdsIgzkUGg1ZQ8Lnnbxh_a88zyiC91nxP4r1LyPlOoY-iF0LQ8td9QOuOWh6bfYDhxTopSaMbxmFx63iW5Od8Y-nh7fly_Z6u35dblYZbUq9ZAhyrwuyHpUTlGBbiOl9t7JEjZUFl54KUtBtcOcPIpyfFkCA4BUam1IzVh27K1jl1IkX_UxNBj3lYDq4KI6uKj-XIz83ZHvd5uG3D99Gq9-AT9SXOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Sakakura, C E ; Morais, J A N D ; Loffredo, L C M ; Scaf, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakakura, C E ; Morais, J A N D ; Loffredo, L C M ; Scaf, G</creatorcontrib><description>To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil. Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-operative implant site assessment and for follow-up, particularly with respect to cost, patient radiation dose, and broad coverage of facial bones and teeth. Epi-Info 6.04 software was used to analyse the database file. Approximately 63.8% of the dentists prescribed only panoramic radiography for dental implant assessment and 28.9% ordered panoramic radiography plus periapical radiography and/or conventional tomography and/or computed tomography (CT). Only 7.2% of the dentists ordered conventional tomography or CT as a single examination, although 10.1% ordered it in combination with other imaging modalities. The main reasons given for prescribing panoramic radiography were broad coverage and cost (86.4%). This study has shown that most of the dentists in this study prescribe panoramic radiographs in dental implant assessment based on broad coverage and cost. They are not following the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommendations regarding cross-sectional imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-542X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/20681066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15070843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional ; Brazil ; Dental Implants - economics ; Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Patient Care Planning ; Practice Patterns, Dentists ; Prescriptions ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography, Dental - economics ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Tomography, X-Ray ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tooth - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2003-11, Vol.32 (6), p.397-400</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15070843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakakura, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais, J A N D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loffredo, L C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaf, G</creatorcontrib><title>A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment</title><title>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</title><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><description>To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil. Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-operative implant site assessment and for follow-up, particularly with respect to cost, patient radiation dose, and broad coverage of facial bones and teeth. Epi-Info 6.04 software was used to analyse the database file. Approximately 63.8% of the dentists prescribed only panoramic radiography for dental implant assessment and 28.9% ordered panoramic radiography plus periapical radiography and/or conventional tomography and/or computed tomography (CT). Only 7.2% of the dentists ordered conventional tomography or CT as a single examination, although 10.1% ordered it in combination with other imaging modalities. The main reasons given for prescribing panoramic radiography were broad coverage and cost (86.4%). This study has shown that most of the dentists in this study prescribe panoramic radiographs in dental implant assessment based on broad coverage and cost. They are not following the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommendations regarding cross-sectional imaging.</description><subject>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Dental Implants - economics</subject><subject>Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Dentists</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - economics</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tooth - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0250-832X</issn><issn>1476-542X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtKA0EQRRtRTIwu3Ur_wJjq58wsY_AFATcK2Q2V6WptyTzongj5eyck4qrg1uHCPYzdCrgX0pRz1_g4l2ALAdaesanQuc2MlutzNgVpICuUXE_YVUrfAKCVsZdsIgzkUGg1ZQ8Lnnbxh_a88zyiC91nxP4r1LyPlOoY-iF0LQ8td9QOuOWh6bfYDhxTopSaMbxmFx63iW5Od8Y-nh7fly_Z6u35dblYZbUq9ZAhyrwuyHpUTlGBbiOl9t7JEjZUFl54KUtBtcOcPIpyfFkCA4BUam1IzVh27K1jl1IkX_UxNBj3lYDq4KI6uKj-XIz83ZHvd5uG3D99Gq9-AT9SXOg</recordid><startdate>200311</startdate><enddate>200311</enddate><creator>Sakakura, C E</creator><creator>Morais, J A N D</creator><creator>Loffredo, L C M</creator><creator>Scaf, G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200311</creationdate><title>A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment</title><author>Sakakura, C E ; Morais, J A N D ; Loffredo, L C M ; Scaf, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Dental Implants - economics</topic><topic>Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Dentists</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - economics</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tooth - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakakura, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais, J A N D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loffredo, L C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaf, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakakura, C E</au><au>Morais, J A N D</au><au>Loffredo, L C M</au><au>Scaf, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment</atitle><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><date>2003-11</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>397-400</pages><issn>0250-832X</issn><eissn>1476-542X</eissn><abstract>To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil. Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-operative implant site assessment and for follow-up, particularly with respect to cost, patient radiation dose, and broad coverage of facial bones and teeth. Epi-Info 6.04 software was used to analyse the database file. Approximately 63.8% of the dentists prescribed only panoramic radiography for dental implant assessment and 28.9% ordered panoramic radiography plus periapical radiography and/or conventional tomography and/or computed tomography (CT). Only 7.2% of the dentists ordered conventional tomography or CT as a single examination, although 10.1% ordered it in combination with other imaging modalities. The main reasons given for prescribing panoramic radiography were broad coverage and cost (86.4%). This study has shown that most of the dentists in this study prescribe panoramic radiographs in dental implant assessment based on broad coverage and cost. They are not following the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommendations regarding cross-sectional imaging.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>15070843</pmid><doi>10.1259/dmfr/20681066</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0250-832X
ispartof Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2003-11, Vol.32 (6), p.397-400
issn 0250-832X
1476-542X
language eng
recordid cdi_crossref_primary_10_1259_dmfr_20681066
source Oxford Journals Online
subjects Anatomy, Cross-Sectional
Brazil
Dental Implants - economics
Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Patient Care Planning
Practice Patterns, Dentists
Prescriptions
Radiation Dosage
Radiography, Dental - economics
Radiography, Panoramic
Tomography, X-Ray
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Tooth - diagnostic imaging
title A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A39%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20of%20radiographic%20prescription%20in%20dental%20implant%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Dento-maxillo-facial%20radiology&rft.au=Sakakura,%20C%20E&rft.date=2003-11&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=397-400&rft.issn=0250-832X&rft.eissn=1476-542X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/dmfr/20681066&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E15070843%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15070843&rfr_iscdi=true