Loading…
A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment
To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil. Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-ope...
Saved in:
Published in: | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology 2003-11, Vol.32 (6), p.397-400 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3 |
container_end_page | 400 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 397 |
container_title | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Sakakura, C E Morais, J A N D Loffredo, L C M Scaf, G |
description | To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil.
Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-operative implant site assessment and for follow-up, particularly with respect to cost, patient radiation dose, and broad coverage of facial bones and teeth. Epi-Info 6.04 software was used to analyse the database file.
Approximately 63.8% of the dentists prescribed only panoramic radiography for dental implant assessment and 28.9% ordered panoramic radiography plus periapical radiography and/or conventional tomography and/or computed tomography (CT). Only 7.2% of the dentists ordered conventional tomography or CT as a single examination, although 10.1% ordered it in combination with other imaging modalities. The main reasons given for prescribing panoramic radiography were broad coverage and cost (86.4%).
This study has shown that most of the dentists in this study prescribe panoramic radiographs in dental implant assessment based on broad coverage and cost. They are not following the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommendations regarding cross-sectional imaging. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1259/dmfr/20681066 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1259_dmfr_20681066</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>15070843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMtKA0EQRRtRTIwu3Ur_wJjq58wsY_AFATcK2Q2V6WptyTzongj5eyck4qrg1uHCPYzdCrgX0pRz1_g4l2ALAdaesanQuc2MlutzNgVpICuUXE_YVUrfAKCVsZdsIgzkUGg1ZQ8Lnnbxh_a88zyiC91nxP4r1LyPlOoY-iF0LQ8td9QOuOWh6bfYDhxTopSaMbxmFx63iW5Od8Y-nh7fly_Z6u35dblYZbUq9ZAhyrwuyHpUTlGBbiOl9t7JEjZUFl54KUtBtcOcPIpyfFkCA4BUam1IzVh27K1jl1IkX_UxNBj3lYDq4KI6uKj-XIz83ZHvd5uG3D99Gq9-AT9SXOg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment</title><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><creator>Sakakura, C E ; Morais, J A N D ; Loffredo, L C M ; Scaf, G</creator><creatorcontrib>Sakakura, C E ; Morais, J A N D ; Loffredo, L C M ; Scaf, G</creatorcontrib><description>To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil.
Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-operative implant site assessment and for follow-up, particularly with respect to cost, patient radiation dose, and broad coverage of facial bones and teeth. Epi-Info 6.04 software was used to analyse the database file.
Approximately 63.8% of the dentists prescribed only panoramic radiography for dental implant assessment and 28.9% ordered panoramic radiography plus periapical radiography and/or conventional tomography and/or computed tomography (CT). Only 7.2% of the dentists ordered conventional tomography or CT as a single examination, although 10.1% ordered it in combination with other imaging modalities. The main reasons given for prescribing panoramic radiography were broad coverage and cost (86.4%).
This study has shown that most of the dentists in this study prescribe panoramic radiographs in dental implant assessment based on broad coverage and cost. They are not following the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommendations regarding cross-sectional imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0250-832X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1476-542X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/20681066</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15070843</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional ; Brazil ; Dental Implants - economics ; Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging ; Follow-Up Studies ; Humans ; Patient Care Planning ; Practice Patterns, Dentists ; Prescriptions ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiography, Dental - economics ; Radiography, Panoramic ; Tomography, X-Ray ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Tooth - diagnostic imaging</subject><ispartof>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2003-11, Vol.32 (6), p.397-400</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15070843$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sakakura, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais, J A N D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loffredo, L C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaf, G</creatorcontrib><title>A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment</title><title>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</title><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><description>To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil.
Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-operative implant site assessment and for follow-up, particularly with respect to cost, patient radiation dose, and broad coverage of facial bones and teeth. Epi-Info 6.04 software was used to analyse the database file.
Approximately 63.8% of the dentists prescribed only panoramic radiography for dental implant assessment and 28.9% ordered panoramic radiography plus periapical radiography and/or conventional tomography and/or computed tomography (CT). Only 7.2% of the dentists ordered conventional tomography or CT as a single examination, although 10.1% ordered it in combination with other imaging modalities. The main reasons given for prescribing panoramic radiography were broad coverage and cost (86.4%).
This study has shown that most of the dentists in this study prescribe panoramic radiographs in dental implant assessment based on broad coverage and cost. They are not following the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommendations regarding cross-sectional imaging.</description><subject>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Dental Implants - economics</subject><subject>Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Patient Care Planning</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Dentists</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiography, Dental - economics</subject><subject>Radiography, Panoramic</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Tooth - diagnostic imaging</subject><issn>0250-832X</issn><issn>1476-542X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMtKA0EQRRtRTIwu3Ur_wJjq58wsY_AFATcK2Q2V6WptyTzongj5eyck4qrg1uHCPYzdCrgX0pRz1_g4l2ALAdaesanQuc2MlutzNgVpICuUXE_YVUrfAKCVsZdsIgzkUGg1ZQ8Lnnbxh_a88zyiC91nxP4r1LyPlOoY-iF0LQ8td9QOuOWh6bfYDhxTopSaMbxmFx63iW5Od8Y-nh7fly_Z6u35dblYZbUq9ZAhyrwuyHpUTlGBbiOl9t7JEjZUFl54KUtBtcOcPIpyfFkCA4BUam1IzVh27K1jl1IkX_UxNBj3lYDq4KI6uKj-XIz83ZHvd5uG3D99Gq9-AT9SXOg</recordid><startdate>200311</startdate><enddate>200311</enddate><creator>Sakakura, C E</creator><creator>Morais, J A N D</creator><creator>Loffredo, L C M</creator><creator>Scaf, G</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200311</creationdate><title>A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment</title><author>Sakakura, C E ; Morais, J A N D ; Loffredo, L C M ; Scaf, G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Anatomy, Cross-Sectional</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Dental Implants - economics</topic><topic>Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Patient Care Planning</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Dentists</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiography, Dental - economics</topic><topic>Radiography, Panoramic</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Tooth - diagnostic imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sakakura, C E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morais, J A N D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loffredo, L C M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scaf, G</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sakakura, C E</au><au>Morais, J A N D</au><au>Loffredo, L C M</au><au>Scaf, G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment</atitle><jtitle>Dento-maxillo-facial radiology</jtitle><addtitle>Dentomaxillofac Radiol</addtitle><date>2003-11</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>400</epage><pages>397-400</pages><issn>0250-832X</issn><eissn>1476-542X</eissn><abstract>To survey the current radiographic prescriptions in dental implant assessment amongst dentists in Brazil.
Sixty-nine dentists were interviewed during a dental implant meeting by two calibrated graduate students, using a 19-question questionnaire, considering imaging modality options both for pre-operative implant site assessment and for follow-up, particularly with respect to cost, patient radiation dose, and broad coverage of facial bones and teeth. Epi-Info 6.04 software was used to analyse the database file.
Approximately 63.8% of the dentists prescribed only panoramic radiography for dental implant assessment and 28.9% ordered panoramic radiography plus periapical radiography and/or conventional tomography and/or computed tomography (CT). Only 7.2% of the dentists ordered conventional tomography or CT as a single examination, although 10.1% ordered it in combination with other imaging modalities. The main reasons given for prescribing panoramic radiography were broad coverage and cost (86.4%).
This study has shown that most of the dentists in this study prescribe panoramic radiographs in dental implant assessment based on broad coverage and cost. They are not following the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology recommendations regarding cross-sectional imaging.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>15070843</pmid><doi>10.1259/dmfr/20681066</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0250-832X |
ispartof | Dento-maxillo-facial radiology, 2003-11, Vol.32 (6), p.397-400 |
issn | 0250-832X 1476-542X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1259_dmfr_20681066 |
source | Oxford Journals Online |
subjects | Anatomy, Cross-Sectional Brazil Dental Implants - economics Facial Bones - diagnostic imaging Follow-Up Studies Humans Patient Care Planning Practice Patterns, Dentists Prescriptions Radiation Dosage Radiography, Dental - economics Radiography, Panoramic Tomography, X-Ray Tomography, X-Ray Computed Tooth - diagnostic imaging |
title | A survey of radiographic prescription in dental implant assessment |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T04%3A39%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20of%20radiographic%20prescription%20in%20dental%20implant%20assessment&rft.jtitle=Dento-maxillo-facial%20radiology&rft.au=Sakakura,%20C%20E&rft.date=2003-11&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=400&rft.pages=397-400&rft.issn=0250-832X&rft.eissn=1476-542X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1259/dmfr/20681066&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_cross%3E15070843%3C/pubmed_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c394t-aa27c8e6fa3d3e8adb224ffd290be98f1f2291ecda7efa19ffd6e0500ae9445e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/15070843&rfr_iscdi=true |