Effect of different hCG treatments on fertility of estrus-induced and artificially inseminated ewes during the non-breeding season

The present study was conducted to determine the effect of two human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) treatments on the fertility of ewes which were estrus-induced and artificially inseminated during the non-breeding season. Suffolk (SF: n = 68) and South-Down (SD: n = 20) ewes were pretreated with a co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Reproduction and Development 2001, Vol.47(4), pp.189-195
Main Authors: Fukui, Y. (Obihiro Univ. of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido (Japan)), Itagaki, R, Ishida, N, Okada, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
BREEDING SEASONS
Ewe
EWES
GONADOTROPINS
Human chorionic gonadotropin
Lambing
Non-breeding season
PARTURITION
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The present study was conducted to determine the effect of two human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) treatments on the fertility of ewes which were estrus-induced and artificially inseminated during the non-breeding season. Suffolk (SF: n = 68) and South-Down (SD: n = 20) ewes were pretreated with a controlled internal drug release dispenser (CIDR) for 12 days and 500 IU equine chorionic gonadotropin 1 day before CIDR removal. Each breed of ewes were divided into 3 groups: Group 1 (n = 31), an intramuscular injection of 100 IU hCG was given on Days 3, 4 and 5 after artificial insemination (AI) (Day 0 = the day of AI); Group 2 (n = 29), an injection of 300 IU hCG was given on Day 4; and Group 3 (n = 28, Control), an injection of 0.6% saline was given on Day 4. Plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations were measured by enzyme-immunoassay in all ewes in the three groups at the time of insemination (Day 0), and Days 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 after AI. On Day 8, the mean P4 concentrations in ewes treated with hCG (Groups 1 and 2) were significantly higher (rho < 0.01) than in the control ewes (Group 3). In Group 2, the mean P4 values on Days 14 and 18 were also higher (rho < 0.05) than those in the control ewes. Pregnancy (Days 20 and 58) and lambing rates were not significantly different among the three groups (37.9%, 55.2% and 54.2% for lambing rates). Prolificacy was also not significantly different among the three groups (1.36, 1.75 and 1.62). These results indicate that the present hCG treatment did not enhance fertility of the inseminated ewes, although the treatment stimulates corpus luteum and increased P4 concentrations.
ISSN:0916-8818
1348-4400
DOI:10.1262/jrd.47.189