Loading…
Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Commercialization of Academic Science: Evidence from “Twin” Discoveries
Which factors shape the commercialization of academic scientific discoveries via startup formation? Prior literature has identified several contributing factors but does not address the fundamental problem that the commercial potential of a nascent discovery is generally unobserved, which potentiall...
Saved in:
Published in: | Management science 2022-02, Vol.68 (2), p.1330-1352 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-c0cf4ce5ad1afe15c83dd02e715e77afafec66512c12fa8e035c3c331b042f7f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-c0cf4ce5ad1afe15c83dd02e715e77afafec66512c12fa8e035c3c331b042f7f3 |
container_end_page | 1352 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 1330 |
container_title | Management science |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Marx, Matt Hsu, David H. |
description | Which factors shape the commercialization of academic scientific discoveries via startup formation? Prior literature has identified several contributing factors but does not address the fundamental problem that the commercial potential of a nascent discovery is generally unobserved, which potentially confounds inference. We construct a sample of approximately 20,000 “twin” scientific articles, which allows us to hold constant differences in the nature of the advance and more precisely examine characteristics that predict startup commercialization. In this framework, several commonly accepted factors appear not to influence commercialization. However, we find that teams of academic scientists whose former collaborators include “star” serial entrepreneurs are much more likely to commercialize their own discoveries via startups, as are more interdisciplinary teams of scientists.
This paper was accepted by Sridhar Tayur, entrepreneurship and innovation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1287/mnsc.2021.3966 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2021_3966</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2635266597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-c0cf4ce5ad1afe15c83dd02e715e77afafec66512c12fa8e035c3c331b042f7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw5WyJc4Lt1HHCrSrlR6qEBOUcmc0aXDV2sdMiOPVB4OX6JCQqd047Ws3sjj5CzjlLuSjUZeMipIIJnmZlnh-QAZciT6Rk_JAMGBMy4SUrj8lJjAvGmCpUPiCLR9zYaFvrXmn7hnTq2oCrgA7XweolnfimwQCdtF-6td5Rb-gYdI2NBfoEFh3gFZ1ubN0raoJv6G77Pf-wbrf9odc2gt9gsBhPyZHRy4hnf3NInm-m88ldMnu4vZ-MZwl0VdsEGJgRoNQ11wa5hCKrayZQcYlKadMtIc8lF8CF0QWyTEIGWcZf2EgYZbIhudjfXQX_vsbYVgu_Dq57WYk865jkslSdK927IPgYA5pqFWyjw2fFWdXzrHqeVc-z6nl2gWQfsM740MT__L9yunwh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2635266597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Commercialization of Academic Science: Evidence from “Twin” Discoveries</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Informs</source><creator>Marx, Matt ; Hsu, David H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Marx, Matt ; Hsu, David H.</creatorcontrib><description>Which factors shape the commercialization of academic scientific discoveries via startup formation? Prior literature has identified several contributing factors but does not address the fundamental problem that the commercial potential of a nascent discovery is generally unobserved, which potentially confounds inference. We construct a sample of approximately 20,000 “twin” scientific articles, which allows us to hold constant differences in the nature of the advance and more precisely examine characteristics that predict startup commercialization. In this framework, several commonly accepted factors appear not to influence commercialization. However, we find that teams of academic scientists whose former collaborators include “star” serial entrepreneurs are much more likely to commercialize their own discoveries via startups, as are more interdisciplinary teams of scientists.
This paper was accepted by Sridhar Tayur, entrepreneurship and innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-1909</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-5501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2021.3966</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Linthicum: INFORMS</publisher><subject>Commercialization ; Entrepreneurs ; Entrepreneurship ; Interdisciplinary aspects ; Scientists ; Startups ; Teams ; technology commercialization ; university technology transfer ; “twin” scientific discoveries</subject><ispartof>Management science, 2022-02, Vol.68 (2), p.1330-1352</ispartof><rights>Copyright Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences Feb 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-c0cf4ce5ad1afe15c83dd02e715e77afafec66512c12fa8e035c3c331b042f7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-c0cf4ce5ad1afe15c83dd02e715e77afafec66512c12fa8e035c3c331b042f7f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8228-5449 ; 0000-0002-6173-4142</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubsonline.informs.org/doi/full/10.1287/mnsc.2021.3966$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginforms$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3692,27924,27925,33223,62616</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marx, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, David H.</creatorcontrib><title>Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Commercialization of Academic Science: Evidence from “Twin” Discoveries</title><title>Management science</title><description>Which factors shape the commercialization of academic scientific discoveries via startup formation? Prior literature has identified several contributing factors but does not address the fundamental problem that the commercial potential of a nascent discovery is generally unobserved, which potentially confounds inference. We construct a sample of approximately 20,000 “twin” scientific articles, which allows us to hold constant differences in the nature of the advance and more precisely examine characteristics that predict startup commercialization. In this framework, several commonly accepted factors appear not to influence commercialization. However, we find that teams of academic scientists whose former collaborators include “star” serial entrepreneurs are much more likely to commercialize their own discoveries via startups, as are more interdisciplinary teams of scientists.
This paper was accepted by Sridhar Tayur, entrepreneurship and innovation.</description><subject>Commercialization</subject><subject>Entrepreneurs</subject><subject>Entrepreneurship</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary aspects</subject><subject>Scientists</subject><subject>Startups</subject><subject>Teams</subject><subject>technology commercialization</subject><subject>university technology transfer</subject><subject>“twin” scientific discoveries</subject><issn>0025-1909</issn><issn>1526-5501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkM1OwzAQhC0EEqVw5WyJc4Lt1HHCrSrlR6qEBOUcmc0aXDV2sdMiOPVB4OX6JCQqd047Ws3sjj5CzjlLuSjUZeMipIIJnmZlnh-QAZciT6Rk_JAMGBMy4SUrj8lJjAvGmCpUPiCLR9zYaFvrXmn7hnTq2oCrgA7XweolnfimwQCdtF-6td5Rb-gYdI2NBfoEFh3gFZ1ubN0raoJv6G77Pf-wbrf9odc2gt9gsBhPyZHRy4hnf3NInm-m88ldMnu4vZ-MZwl0VdsEGJgRoNQ11wa5hCKrayZQcYlKadMtIc8lF8CF0QWyTEIGWcZf2EgYZbIhudjfXQX_vsbYVgu_Dq57WYk865jkslSdK927IPgYA5pqFWyjw2fFWdXzrHqeVc-z6nl2gWQfsM740MT__L9yunwh</recordid><startdate>20220201</startdate><enddate>20220201</enddate><creator>Marx, Matt</creator><creator>Hsu, David H.</creator><general>INFORMS</general><general>Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-5449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-4142</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20220201</creationdate><title>Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Commercialization of Academic Science: Evidence from “Twin” Discoveries</title><author>Marx, Matt ; Hsu, David H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-c0cf4ce5ad1afe15c83dd02e715e77afafec66512c12fa8e035c3c331b042f7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Commercialization</topic><topic>Entrepreneurs</topic><topic>Entrepreneurship</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary aspects</topic><topic>Scientists</topic><topic>Startups</topic><topic>Teams</topic><topic>technology commercialization</topic><topic>university technology transfer</topic><topic>“twin” scientific discoveries</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marx, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, David H.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marx, Matt</au><au>Hsu, David H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Commercialization of Academic Science: Evidence from “Twin” Discoveries</atitle><jtitle>Management science</jtitle><date>2022-02-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1330</spage><epage>1352</epage><pages>1330-1352</pages><issn>0025-1909</issn><eissn>1526-5501</eissn><abstract>Which factors shape the commercialization of academic scientific discoveries via startup formation? Prior literature has identified several contributing factors but does not address the fundamental problem that the commercial potential of a nascent discovery is generally unobserved, which potentially confounds inference. We construct a sample of approximately 20,000 “twin” scientific articles, which allows us to hold constant differences in the nature of the advance and more precisely examine characteristics that predict startup commercialization. In this framework, several commonly accepted factors appear not to influence commercialization. However, we find that teams of academic scientists whose former collaborators include “star” serial entrepreneurs are much more likely to commercialize their own discoveries via startups, as are more interdisciplinary teams of scientists.
This paper was accepted by Sridhar Tayur, entrepreneurship and innovation.</abstract><cop>Linthicum</cop><pub>INFORMS</pub><doi>10.1287/mnsc.2021.3966</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-5449</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6173-4142</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-1909 |
ispartof | Management science, 2022-02, Vol.68 (2), p.1330-1352 |
issn | 0025-1909 1526-5501 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_crossref_primary_10_1287_mnsc_2021_3966 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Informs |
subjects | Commercialization Entrepreneurs Entrepreneurship Interdisciplinary aspects Scientists Startups Teams technology commercialization university technology transfer “twin” scientific discoveries |
title | Revisiting the Entrepreneurial Commercialization of Academic Science: Evidence from “Twin” Discoveries |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T02%3A58%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Revisiting%20the%20Entrepreneurial%20Commercialization%20of%20Academic%20Science:%20Evidence%20from%20%E2%80%9CTwin%E2%80%9D%20Discoveries&rft.jtitle=Management%20science&rft.au=Marx,%20Matt&rft.date=2022-02-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1330&rft.epage=1352&rft.pages=1330-1352&rft.issn=0025-1909&rft.eissn=1526-5501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1287/mnsc.2021.3966&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2635266597%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c501t-c0cf4ce5ad1afe15c83dd02e715e77afafec66512c12fa8e035c3c331b042f7f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2635266597&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |